921Case T-194/25, Scrap-Transporteur: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, sitting with five Judges) of 29 April 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof – Germany) – Hauptzollamt A v Scrap-Transporteur (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Excise duties – Excise duty applied to manufactured tobacco – Smoking tobacco – Concept of tobacco capable of being smoked without further industrial processing – Article 5(1)(a) of Directive 2011/64/UE – Scraps of raw tobacco, uncut but threshed and stripped, capable of being processed into water-pipe tobacco through a complex process carried out at home by the consumer)cjeu_case · April 28, 2026
922Case T-124/25: Judgment of the General Court of 29 April 2026 – Wazdan Innovations v EUIPO (5 Coins) (EU trade mark – Application for the EU word mark 5 Coins – Absolute ground for refusal – Lack of distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)cjeu_case · April 28, 2026
923Case T-123/25: Judgment of the General Court of 29 April 2026 – Wazdan Innovations v EUIPO (3 Coins) (EU trade mark – Application for the EU word mark 3 Coins – Absolute ground for refusal – Lack of distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)cjeu_case · April 28, 2026
924Case T-122/25: Judgment of the General Court of 29 April 2026 – Wazdan Innovations v EUIPO (1 Coin) (EU trade mark – Application for the EU word mark 1 Coin – Absolute ground for refusal – Lack of distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)cjeu_case · April 28, 2026
925Case T-30/25: Judgment of the General Court of 29 April 2026 – HI v Parliament (Civil service – Officials – Reports procedure – 2022 appraisal procedure – Staff report – Impartiality – Duty of care – Protection of personal data – Article 43 of the Staff Regulations – Internal rules on staff reports – Manifest error of assessment)cjeu_case · April 28, 2026
926Arrêt du Tribunal (dixième chambre) du 29 avril 2026.#Dmitry Konov contre Conseil de l'Union européenne.#Politique étrangère et de sécurité commune – Mesures restrictives prises eu égard aux actions compromettant ou menaçant l’intégrité territoriale, la souveraineté et l’indépendance de l’Ukraine – Gel des fonds – Liste des personnes, des entités et des organismes auxquels s’applique le gel des fonds et des ressources économiques – Inscription et maintien du nom du requérant sur la liste – Notion de “femme ou homme d’affaires influent ayant une activité en Russie” – Notion de “femme ou homme d’affaires ayant une activité dans des secteurs économiques qui fournissent une source substantielle de revenus au gouvernement de la Fédération de Russie” – Article 2, paragraphe 1, sous g), de la décision 2014/145/PESC – Article 3, paragraphe 1, sous g), du règlement (UE) no 269/2014 – Droit à une protection juridictionnelle effective – Obligation de motivation – Erreur d’appréciation – Proportionnalité – Égalité de traitement – Droit de propriété – Liberté d’entreprise – Droit au respect de la vie privée – Responsabilité non contractuelle.#Affaire T-600/24.cjeu_case · April 28, 2026
927Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 29 April 2026.#Romagnoli Fratelli SpA v Community Plant Variety Office.#Plant varieties – Grant of a Community plant variety right for the potato variety Melrose – Failure to pay the annual fee on time – Cancellation of right – Application for restitutio in integrum – Competence of the Board of Appeal – Concept of ‘particular circumstances’ – Conditions for notification of decisions and communications of the CPVO.#Case T-573/24.cjeu_case · April 28, 2026
928Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 29 April 2026.#Romagnoli Fratelli SpA v Community Plant Variety Office.#Plant varieties – Grant of a Community plant variety right for the potato variety Melrose – Failure to pay the annual fee on time – Cancellation of right – Application for restitutio in integrum – Competence of the Board of Appeal – Concept of ‘particular circumstances’ – Conditions for notification of decisions and communications of the CPVO.#Case T-573/24.cjeu_case · April 28, 2026
929Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 29 April 2026.#Isabel Sánchez v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Recruitment – Notice of competition – Open competition EPSO/AD/391/21 – Decision not to place the applicant’s name on the reserve list – Equal treatment – Normalisation of marks – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Principle of good administration – Duration of the administrative procedure – Reasonable period of time.#Case T-229/24.cjeu_case · April 28, 2026
930Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 29 April 2026.#Isabel Sánchez v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Recruitment – Notice of competition – Open competition EPSO/AD/391/21 – Decision not to place the applicant’s name on the reserve list – Equal treatment – Normalisation of marks – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Principle of good administration – Duration of the administrative procedure – Reasonable period of time.#Case T-229/24.cjeu_case · April 28, 2026
931Case T-600/24: Judgment of the General Court of 29 April 2026 – Konov v Council (Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Concept of leading businessperson operating in Russia – Concept of businessperson involved in economic sectors providing a substantial source of revenue to the Government of the Russian Federation – Article 2(1)(g) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 3(1)(g) of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Right to effective judicial protection – Obligation to state reasons – Error of assessment – Proportionality – Equal treatment – Right to property – Freedom to conduct a business – Right to respect for private life – Non-contractual liability)cjeu_case · April 28, 2026
932Case T-573/24: Judgment of the General Court of 29 April 2026 – Romagnoli Fratelli v CPVO (Melrose) (Plant varieties – Grant of a Community plant variety right for the potato variety Melrose – Failure to pay the annual fee on time – Cancellation of right – Application for restitutio in integrum – Competence of the Board of Appeal – Concept of particular circumstances – Conditions for notification of decisions and communications of the CPVO)cjeu_case · April 28, 2026
933Case T-229/24: Judgment of the General Court of 29 April 2026 – Sánchez v Commission (Civil service – Officials – Recruitment – Notice of competition – Open competition EPSO/AD/391/21 – Decision not to place the applicant’s name on the reserve list – Equal treatment – Normalisation of marks – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Principle of good administration – Duration of the administrative procedure – Reasonable period of time)cjeu_case · April 28, 2026
934Arrêt du Tribunal (quatrième chambre élargie) du 29 avril 2026.#TC contre Parlement européen.#Droit institutionnel – Réglementation concernant les frais et indemnités des députés au Parlement – Indemnité d’assistance parlementaire – Recouvrement des sommes indûment versées – Obligation de motivation – Erreur d’appréciation.#Affaire T-309/21 RENV.cjeu_case · April 28, 2026
935Case T-309/21 RENV: Judgment of the General Court of 29 April 2026 – TC v Parliament (Law governing the institutions – Rules governing expenses and allowances for Members of Parliament – Parliamentary assistance allowance – Recovery of sums unduly paid – Obligation to state reasons – Error of assessment)cjeu_case · April 28, 2026
936Case T-307/26, Austrian Airlines: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Düsseldorf (Germany) made on 28 April 2026 – BX v Austrian Airlines AGcjeu_case · April 27, 2026
937Case T-266/26: Action brought on 28 April 2026 – Hydac Technology and Leebucc (Tianjin) Hydraulics Equipment v Commissioncjeu_case · April 27, 2026
939Case C-409/26, Sijberg: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van Beroep te Gent (Belgium) lodged on 28 April 2026 – WD v Belgische Staat / Federale Overheidsdienst Financiëncjeu_case · April 27, 2026
940Case C-405/26, Syndyk masy upadłości Getin Noble Bank: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Apelacyjny w Warszawie (Poland) lodged on 28 April 2026 – Syndyk masy upadłości Getin Noble Bank S.A. w upadłości v FVcjeu_case · April 27, 2026