Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 314 documents
8841

Joined Cases C-269/23 P and C-272/23 P: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 28 November 2024 – Hengshi Egypt Fiberglass Fabrics SAE (C-269/23 P) and Jushi Egypt for Fiberglass Industry SAE (C-269/23 P and C-272/23 P) v European Commission (Appeal – Common commercial policy – Protection against subsidised imports from third countries – Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures of the World Trade Organization (WTO) – Articles 1 and 2 – Regulation (EU) 2016/1037 – Articles 2 to 4 – Concepts of subsidy, government, specificity and benefit – Financial contributions granted by Chinese public bodies to undertakings incorporated under Egyptian law owned by Chinese entities established in the China-Egypt Suez Economic and Trade Cooperation Zone – Possibility of classifying such financial contributions as subsidies granted by the Government of Egypt, having regard to that government’s own conduct – Whether permissible – Conditions – Financial contribution consisting in forgoing government revenue that is otherwise due – Benefit conferred on the recipient undertakings – Choice of the relevant reference situation for the purpose of characterising the existence of that financial contribution and that benefit – Articles 5 and 6 – Calculation of the benefit – Concepts of recipient and undertaking)

cjeu_case ·
8842

Case C-169/23, Másdi: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 28 November 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Kúria – Hungary) – Nemzeti Adatvédelmi és Információszabadság Hatóság v UC (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and the free movement of such data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Data processed when drawing up a COVID-19 certificate – Data not collected from the data subject – Information to be provided – Exception to the obligation to provide information – Article 14(5)(c) – Data generated by the controller in the context of its own processes – Right to complain – Competence of the supervisory authority – Article 77(1) – Appropriate measures to protect the data subject’s legitimate interests provided for by the Member State law to which the controller is subject – Measures relating to the security of data processing – Article 32)

cjeu_case ·
8843

Joined Cases C-129/23 and C-567/23, BG Technik and Others: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 28 November 2024 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší správní soud and the Krajský soud v Ostravě – Czech Republic) – BG Technik cs a.s. v Generální ředitelství cel (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs union – Common Customs Tariff – Combined Nomenclature – Classification of goods – Tariff heading 8703 – Motor cars and other motor vehicles principally designed for the transport of persons – Tariff heading 8713 – Carriages for disabled persons – Regulation (EC) No 718/2009 – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/1367 – SELVO 4800 vehicle – Concept of disabled persons)

cjeu_case ·
8844

Case C-80/23, Ministerstvo na vatreshnite raboti (Recording of biometric and genetic data II): Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 28 November 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski gradski sad – Bulgaria) – Criminal proceedings against V.S. (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Directive (EU) 2016/680 – Article 4(1)(a) to (c) – Article 8(1) and (2) – Article 10 – Accused person – Police record containing biometric and genetic data – Enforcement – Objectives of prevention and detection of criminal offences – Interpretation of the judgment of 26 January 2023, Ministerstvo na vatreshnite raboti (Recording of biometric and genetic data by the police) (C-205/21, EU:C:2023:49) – Obligation to interpret national law in conformity with EU law – Assessment of whether it is strictly necessary for the competent authorities to process sensitive data – Role of the competent authorities)

cjeu_case ·
8845

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 28 November 2024.#Bayerische Ärzteversorgung and Others v Deutsche Bundesbank.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht.#References for a preliminary ruling – Economic and monetary policy – European system of national and regional accounts – Statistical reporting requirements applicable to pension funds – Special pension schemes for the professions – Compulsory membership and contributions.#Case C-758/22.

cjeu_case ·
8846

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 28 November 2024.#Criminal proceedings against PT.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Criminal offences and penalties in the field of illicit drug trafficking and the fight against organised crime – Possibility to reduce applicable penalties – Scope – Framework Decision 2004/757/JHA – Articles 4 and 5 – Framework Decision 2008/841/JHA – Articles 3 and 4 – National legislation not implementing EU law – Article 51(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Effective judicial protection – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Criminal proceedings against several persons – Agreement for settlement of the case provided for in national law – Approval by an ad hoc court – Consent of the other defendants.#Case C-432/22.

cjeu_case ·
8847

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 28 November 2024.#Criminal proceedings against PT.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Criminal offences and penalties in the field of illicit drug trafficking and the fight against organised crime – Possibility to reduce applicable penalties – Scope – Framework Decision 2004/757/JHA – Articles 4 and 5 – Framework Decision 2008/841/JHA – Articles 3 and 4 – National legislation not implementing EU law – Article 51(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Effective judicial protection – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Criminal proceedings against several persons – Agreement for settlement of the case provided for in national law – Approval by an ad hoc court – Consent of the other defendants.#Case C-432/22.

cjeu_case ·
8848

Joined Cases C-758/22 and C-759/22, Bayerische Ärzteversorgung and Others: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 28 November 2024 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht – Germany) – Bayerische Ärzteversorgung and Others (C-758/22), Sächsische Ärzteversorgung (C-759/22) v Deutsche Bundesbank (References for a preliminary ruling – Economic and monetary policy – European system of national and regional accounts – Statistical reporting requirements applicable to pension funds – Special pension schemes for the professions – Compulsory membership and contributions)

cjeu_case ·
8849

Case C-432/22, PT (Agreement concluded between the prosecutor and the perpetrator of an offence): Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 28 November 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad – Bulgaria) – Criminal proceedings against PT (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Criminal offences and penalties in the field of illicit drug trafficking and the fight against organised crime – Possibility to reduce applicable penalties – Scope – Framework Decision 2004/757/JHA – Articles 4 and 5 – Framework Decision 2008/841/JHA – Articles 3 and 4 – National legislation not implementing EU law – Article 51(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Effective judicial protection – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Criminal proceedings against several persons – Agreement for settlement of the case provided for in national law – Approval by an ad hoc court – Consent of the other defendants)

cjeu_case ·
8851

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 27 November 2024.#Vino Vintana AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark SINCE 1974 PRIMITIVO DI MANDURIA DENOMINAZIONE DI ORIGINE CONTROLLATA Una antica tradizione familiare – Absolute ground for invalidity – Lack of distinctive character – Article 52(1)(a) and Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(a) and Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-276/24.

cjeu_case ·
8852

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 27 November 2024.#Vino Vintana AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark SINCE 1974 PRIMITIVO DI MANDURIA DENOMINAZIONE DI ORIGINE CONTROLLATA Una antica tradizione familiare – Absolute ground for invalidity – Lack of distinctive character – Article 52(1)(a) and Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(a) and Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-276/24.

cjeu_case ·
8853

Case T-276/24: Judgment of the General Court of 27 November 2024 – Vino Vintana v EUIPO – Torrevento (SINCE 1974 PRIMITIVO DI MANDURIA) (EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark SINCE 1974 PRIMITIVO DI MANDURIA DENOMINAZIONE DI ORIGINE CONTROLLATA Una antica tradizione familiar – Absolute ground for invalidity – Lack of distinctive character – Article 52(1)(a) and Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(a) and Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

cjeu_case ·
8859

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 27 November 2024.#Giorgio Armani SpA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark representing horizontal lines – Earlier EU figurative mark representing a stylised eagle characterised by horizontal blocks – Relative grounds for refusal – Similarity of the signs – Article 8(1)(b) and Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-509/23.

cjeu_case ·
8860

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 27 November 2024.#Giorgio Armani SpA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark representing horizontal lines – Earlier EU figurative mark representing a stylised eagle characterised by horizontal blocks – Relative grounds for refusal – Similarity of the signs – Article 8(1)(b) and Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-509/23.

cjeu_case ·