Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 314 documents
7881

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 5 February 2025.#Dakem v European Commission.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Public health – Implementing Decision (EU) 2023/686 – Refusal to grant a Union authorisation for a single biocidal product (insecticide) – Notification to the addressee – Third subparagraph of Article 297(2) TFEU – Period for lodging an appeal – Sixth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU – Starting point of that period – Appeal manifestly inadmissible.#Case C-308/24 P.

cjeu_case ·
7882

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 5 February 2025.#Dakem v European Commission.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Public health – Implementing Decision (EU) 2023/686 – Refusal to grant a Union authorisation for a single biocidal product (insecticide) – Notification to the addressee – Third subparagraph of Article 297(2) TFEU – Period for lodging an appeal – Sixth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU – Starting point of that period – Appeal manifestly inadmissible.#Case C-308/24 P.

cjeu_case ·
7885

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 5 February 2025.#Republic of Poland v European Commission.#Law governing the institutions – Partial failure to comply with an order of the Court of Justice imposing interim measures in the context of an action for failure to fulfil obligations – Periodic penalty payment – Recovery of amounts receivable by offsetting – Article 101(1) and Article 102 of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 – Jurisdiction of the General Court.#Case T-1033/23.

cjeu_case ·
7886

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 5 February 2025.#Republic of Poland v European Commission.#Law governing the institutions – Partial failure to comply with an order of the Court of Justice imposing interim measures in the context of an action for failure to fulfil obligations – Periodic penalty payment – Recovery of amounts receivable by offsetting – Article 101(1) and Article 102 of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 – Jurisdiction of the General Court.#Case T-1033/23.

cjeu_case ·
7887

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 5 February 2025.#Ege İhracatçıları Birliği and Others v European Commission.#Subsidies – Imports of rainbow trout originating in Türkiye – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/2390 – Definitive countervailing duty – Manifest error of assessment – Pass-through analysis – Calculation of the subsidy amount – Methodology differing from that used in the original investigation – Change of circumstances – Existence of a benefit – Preferential loans and tax treatment – Definition of the product concerned.#Case T-122/23.

cjeu_case ·
7888

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 5 February 2025.#Ege İhracatçıları Birliği and Others v European Commission.#Subsidies – Imports of rainbow trout originating in Türkiye – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/2390 – Definitive countervailing duty – Manifest error of assessment – Pass-through analysis – Calculation of subsidy amount – Methodology differing from that used in the original investigation – Change of circumstances – Existence of a benefit – Preferential loans and tax treatment – Definition of the product concerned.#Case T-122/23.

cjeu_case ·
7892

Case T-1033/23: Judgment of the General Court of 5 February 2025 – Poland v Commission (Law governing the institutions – Partial failure to comply with an order of the Court of Justice imposing interim measures in the context of an action for failure to fulfil obligations – Periodic penalty payment – Recovery of amounts receivable by offsetting – Article 101(1) and Article 102 of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 – Jurisdiction of the General Court)

cjeu_case ·
7893

Case T-122/23: Judgment of the General Court of 5 February 2025 – Ege İhracatçıları Birliği and Others v Commission (Subsidies – Imports of rainbow trout originating in Türkiye – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/2390 – Definitive countervailing duty – Manifest error of assessment – Pass-through analysis – Calculation of subsidy amount – Methodology differing from that used in the original investigation – Change of circumstances – Existence of a benefit – Preferential loans and tax treatment – Definition of the product concerned)

cjeu_case ·
7895

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 5 February 2025.#Republic of Poland v European Commission.#Law governing the institutions – Partial failure to comply with an order of the Court of Justice imposing interim measures in the context of an action for failure to fulfil obligations – Periodic penalty payment – Recovery of amounts receivable by offsetting – Article 101(1) and Article 102 of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 – Jurisdiction of the General Court.#Cases T-830/22 and T-156/23.

cjeu_case ·
7896

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 5 February 2025.#Republic of Poland v European Commission.#Law governing the institutions – Partial failure to comply with an order of the Court of Justice imposing interim measures in the context of an action for failure to fulfil obligations – Periodic penalty payment – Recovery of amounts receivable by offsetting – Article 101(1) and Article 102 of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 – Jurisdiction of the General Court.#Cases T-830/22 and T-156/23.

cjeu_case ·
7897

Cases T-830/22 and T-156/23: Judgment of the General Court of 5 February 2025 – Poland v Commission (Law governing the institutions – Partial failure to comply with an order of the Court of Justice imposing interim measures in the context of an action for failure to fulfil obligations – Periodic penalty payment – Recovery of amounts receivable by offsetting – Article 101(1) and Article 102 of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 – Jurisdiction of the General Court)

cjeu_case ·
7898

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 5 February 2025.#Ryanair DAC v European Commission.#State aid – Portuguese air transport market – Rescue aid granted by Portugal to TAP SGPS – State loan – Decision not to raise any objections – Action for annulment – Locus standi – Admissibility – Eligibility – Point 22 of the Guidelines on State aid for rescuing and restructuring undertakings in difficulty – Company belonging to a group – Intrinsic difficulties not resulting from an arbitrary allocation of costs within the group – Difficulties which are too serious to be dealt with by the group itself – Appropriateness of the aid – Proportionality – Weighing up of the positive and negative effects – Freedom of establishment – Freedom to provide services – Equal treatment – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-743/21.

cjeu_case ·