6341Case C-236/24, Provincie Oost-Vlaanderen and Sogent: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State – Belgium) – Provincie Oost-Vlaanderen, Sogent v KG, WA (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Directive 2011/92/EU – Assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment – Projects listed in Annex II – Determination of the projects to be made subject to an environmental impact assessment (screening) – Article 9a – Prevention of conflicts of interest – Combining the functions of developer and the authority competent to make that determination – Appropriate separation between conflicting functions)cjeu_case · 8 mai 2025
6342Joined Cases C-212/24, C-226/24 and C-227/24, L.T. and Others (Social allowances in respect of fixed-term agricultural workers): Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 8 May 2025 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Corte d’appello di Firenze – Italy) – L.T. s.s. (C-212/24), A.M. (C-226/24), XXX (C-227/24) v Istituto nazionale della previdenza sociale (INPS) (References for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Fixed-term work – Directive 1999/70/EC – Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP – Clause 4(1) – Principle of non-discrimination against fixed-term workers – Scope – Concept of an employment condition – Fixed-term agricultural labourers – Social security contributions calculated on the basis of remuneration – Remuneration of fixed-term agricultural workers established on the basis of daily working hours completed – Remuneration of permanent agricultural workers established on the basis of a fixed daily working time)cjeu_case · 8 mai 2025
6343Case C-130/24, Stadt Wuppertal: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 8 May 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Düsseldorf – Germany) – YC v Stadt Wuppertal (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Citizenship of the Union – Article 20 TFEU – Right to move and reside freely in the territory of the Member States – Derived right of residence of a third-country national who has a dependent minor child with status of citizen of the Union – Relationship of dependency – Nature of a derived right of residence – Point at which the derived right of residence arises – Obligation to obtain a visa subsequently in a third country)cjeu_case · 8 mai 2025
6344Joined Cases C-6/24 and C-231/24, Abanca Corporación Bancaria (Acceleration clause): Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 8 May 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Primera Instancia No 8 de La Coruña – Spain) – Abanca Corporación Bancaria SA v WE (C 6/24), VX (C 231/24) (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Consumer credit agreements – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Article 3(1) – Acceleration clause – Judicial review – No national legislation governing the acceleration clause – Criteria for assessing unfairness)cjeu_case · 8 mai 2025
6345Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 8 May 2025.#HUK-COBURG Haftpflicht-Unterstützungs-Kasse kraftfahrender Beamter Deutschlands a.G. in Coburg v Check24 Vergleichsportal GmbH and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2006/114/EC – Misleading and comparative advertising – Article 4(c) – Permitted comparative advertising – Website offering an online insurance comparison service – Comparison by a third party by means of a grading or points system – Article 2(c) – No identification of a ‘competitor’.#Case C-697/23.cjeu_case · 8 mai 2025
6346Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 8 May 2025.#HUK-COBURG Haftpflicht-Unterstützungs-Kasse kraftfahrender Beamter Deutschlands a.G. in Coburg v Check24 Vergleichsportal GmbH and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht München I.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2006/114/EC – Misleading and comparative advertising – Article 4(c) – Permitted comparative advertising – Website offering an online insurance comparison service – Comparison by a third party by means of a grading or points system – Article 2(c) – No identification of a ‘competitor’.#Case C-697/23.cjeu_case · 8 mai 2025
6347Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 May 2025.#Mikail Safarbekovich Gutseriev v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in Belarus – Decision 2012/642/CFSP – Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 – Freezing of funds – Restriction on admission to and transit through the territory of the European Union – Inclusion and maintenance of the appellant’s name on the lists of persons, entities and bodies concerned – Criterion of benefit from or support for the Lukashenko regime.#Case C-681/23 P.cjeu_case · 8 mai 2025
6348Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 May 2025.#Mikail Safarbekovich Gutseriev v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in Belarus – Decision 2012/642/CFSP – Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 – Freezing of funds – Restriction on admission to and transit through the territory of the European Union – Inclusion and maintenance of the appellant’s name on the lists of persons, entities and bodies concerned – Criterion of benefit from or support for the Lukashenko regime.#Case C-681/23 P.cjeu_case · 8 mai 2025
6349Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 8 May 2025.#Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid v X.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Asylum policy – Directive 2013/32/EU – Article 4(1) and point (b) of the third subparagraph of Article 31(3) – Procedures for granting international protection – Extension by the determining authority of the six-month examination period – Large number of applications for international protection lodged simultaneously – Concept – Consideration of other circumstances.#Case C-662/23.cjeu_case · 8 mai 2025
6350Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 8 May 2025.#Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid v X.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Asylum policy – Directive 2013/32/EU – Article 4(1) and point (b) of the third subparagraph of Article 31(3) – Procedures for granting international protection – Extension by the determining authority of the six-month examination period – Large number of applications for international protection lodged simultaneously – Concept – Consideration of other circumstances.#Case C-662/23.cjeu_case · 8 mai 2025
6351Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2025.#Dyrektor Krajowej Informacji Skarbowej v P. S.A.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 73 – Taxable amount – Consideration – Subsidies directly linked to the price of a taxable transaction – Collective public transport services – Compensation paid by a local authority to the service provider to cover the costs incurred – Direct link between the compensation and the services provided.#Case C-615/23.cjeu_case · 8 mai 2025
6352Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2025.#Dyrektor Krajowej Informacji Skarbowej v P. S.A.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 73 – Taxable amount – Consideration – Subsidies directly linked to the price of a taxable transaction – Collective public transport services – Compensation paid by a local authority to the service provider to cover the costs incurred – Direct link between the compensation and the services provided.#Case C-615/23.cjeu_case · 8 mai 2025
6353Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 8 May 2025.#Beevers Kaas BV v Albert Heijn België NV and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Prohibition – Vertical agreements – Article 101(3) TFEU – Regulation (EU) No 330/2010 – Block exemption – Article 4(b)(i) – Hardcore restriction that removes the benefit of that exemption – Exception – Exclusive distribution agreements – Restriction of active sales in an exclusive territory – Concept of ‘agreement’ – Concurrence of wills between the supplier and its buyers – Proof – Exclusive territory allocated to a buyer – Absence of active sales by other buyers in that territory.#Case C-581/23.cjeu_case · 8 mai 2025
6354Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 8 May 2025.#Beevers Kaas BV v Albert Heijn België NV and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van beroep te Antwerpen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Prohibition – Vertical agreements – Article 101(3) TFEU – Regulation (EU) No 330/2010 – Block exemption – Article 4(b)(i) – Hardcore restriction that removes the benefit of that exemption – Exception – Exclusive distribution agreements – Restriction of active sales in an exclusive territory – Concept of ‘agreement’ – Concurrence of wills between the supplier and its buyers – Proof – Exclusive territory allocated to a buyer – Absence of active sales by other buyers in that territory.#Case C-581/23.cjeu_case · 8 mai 2025
6355Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 8 May 2025.#Criminal proceedings against K.P.#References for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Directive (EU) 2016/1919 – Legal aid – Directive 2013/48/EU – The right of access to a lawyer in criminal proceedings – Procedural safeguards for vulnerable persons – Determination of the vulnerability of such persons – No legal presumption – Direct effect – Questioning of a suspect in the absence of a lawyer – Admissibility of evidence obtained in breach of procedural rights.#Case C-530/23.cjeu_case · 8 mai 2025
6356Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 8 May 2025.#Criminal proceedings against K.P.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy we Włocławku.#References for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Directive (EU) 2016/1919 – Legal aid – Directive 2013/48/EU – The right of access to a lawyer in criminal proceedings – Procedural safeguards for vulnerable persons – Determination of the vulnerability of such persons – No legal presumption – Direct effect – Questioning of a suspect in the absence of a lawyer – Admissibility of evidence obtained in breach of procedural rights.#Case C-530/23.cjeu_case · 8 mai 2025
6357Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 8 May 2025.#I. SA v S. J.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Article 2(b) – Concept of ‘consumer’ – Dual-purpose contract – Farmer concluding a contract for the purchase of a product intended for both agricultural and domestic use – Internal market for electricity – Directive 2009/72/EC – Article 3(7) – Annex I, paragraph 1(a) – Household customer – Contract for the supply of electricity for a fixed period at a fixed price – Contractual penalty for early termination – National legislation limiting the amount of that penalty to the ‘costs and damages resulting from the contract’.#Case C-410/23.cjeu_case · 8 mai 2025
6358Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 8 May 2025.#I. SA v S. J.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Article 2(b) – Concept of ‘consumer’ – Dual-purpose contract – Farmer concluding a contract for the purchase of a product intended for both agricultural and domestic use – Internal market for electricity – Directive 2009/72/EC – Article 3(7) – Annex I, paragraph 1(a) – Household customer – Contract for the supply of electricity for a fixed period at a fixed price – Contractual penalty for early termination – National legislation limiting the amount of that penalty to the ‘costs and damages resulting from the contract’.#Case C-410/23.cjeu_case · 8 mai 2025
6359Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 8 May 2025.#OF and Others v M.K.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Directive 93/13/EEC – Article 6(1) and Article 7(1) – Mortgage loan agreement indexed to a foreign currency – Legal action brought by the consumer seeking a declaration that the agreement is null and void – Application for the grant of protective measures suspending performance of the agreement – Directive 2014/59/EU – Recovery and resolution of credit institutions – Bank under resolution – Article 1(2) – Member States’ power to adopt rules that are stricter than or additional to those in that directive – National rule requiring applications for protective measures directed against institutions under ongoing resolution to be dismissed.#Case C-324/23.cjeu_case · 8 mai 2025
6360Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 8 May 2025.#OF and Others v M.K.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Directive 93/13/EEC – Article 6(1) and Article 7(1) – Mortgage loan agreement indexed to a foreign currency – Legal action brought by the consumer seeking a declaration that the agreement is null and void – Application for the grant of protective measures suspending performance of the agreement – Directive 2014/59/EU – Recovery and resolution of credit institutions – Bank under resolution – Article 1(2) – Member States’ power to adopt rules that are stricter than or additional to those in that directive – National rule requiring applications for protective measures directed against institutions under ongoing resolution to be dismissed.#Case C-324/23.cjeu_case · 8 mai 2025