Catalogue des documents juridiques

104314 documents
541

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber, Extended Composition) of 3 June 2026.#Lami Packaging (Kunshan) Co. Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – Three-dimensional mark – Shape of octagonal carton – Sign consisting exclusively of the shape of goods which is necessary to obtain a technical result – Manufacturing process – Use of the product – Article 7(1)(e)(ii) and Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94.#Case T-104/25.

cjeu_case ·
545

Case T-313/25, Kinova Europe: Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber, sitting with five Judges) of 3 June 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg – Germany) – Kinova Europe GmbH v Hauptzollamt Hanover (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs union – Common Customs Tariff – Combined Nomenclature – Heading 9021 – Orthopaedic appliances – Other appliances which are worn or carried, or implanted in the body, to compensate for a defect or disability – Robotic arm attached to an electric wheelchair)

cjeu_case ·
546

Case T-307/25: Judgment of the General Court of 3 June 2026 – Societatea Română de Endocrinologie v EUIPO – Acta Endocrinologica (Acta Endocrinologica (Buc)) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark Acta Endocrinologica (Buc) – Earlier EU word mark ACTA ENDOCRINOLOGICA (BUC), The International Journal of Romanian Society of Endocrinology / Registered in 1938 New series – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – No similarity of the goods and services – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

cjeu_case ·
548

Case T-267/25: Judgment of the General Court of 3 June 2026 – Osculati v EUIPO – Olymp Bezner (O) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark O – Earlier EU figurative mark O – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Facts or evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Article 95(2) of Regulation 2017/1001)

cjeu_case ·
549

Case T-224/25, VÁM4ALL: Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber, sitting with five judges) of 3 June 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Kúria – Hungary) – VÁM4ALL Kft. felszámolás alatt v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs union – Union Customs Code – Method for determining the customs value – Declared transaction value – Article 15 of Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 – Article 140 of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2447 – Secondary methods – Article 74 of Regulation No 952/2013 – Residual or fall-back method – Article 144 of Implementing Regulation 2015/2447 – Importation of bulk goods – Lack of proof of actual payment – Insufficient data on the essential characteristics of the goods – Use of data available in the national database – Simple arithmetic mean of unit prices)

cjeu_case ·
550

Case T-198/25, G Kft. (Adjustment of VAT after a tax inspection): Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, sitting with five Judges) of 3 June 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék – Hungary) – G Kft. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Common system of VAT – Directive 2006/112/EC – Adjustment of VAT improperly invoiced – Transactions relating to a period closed by a tax inspection – National legislation making the initiation of a new inspection subject to a new fact updated by the taxpayer – Principle of effectiveness – Principle of tax neutrality – Proportionality)

cjeu_case ·
552

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 3 June 2026.#GW v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Retirement pensions – Weighting factor – Resettlement allowance – Decisions of the Swedish courts on the place of residence – Refusal to grant a certificate of residence – Recovery of overpayments – No need to adjudicate in part – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials – Liability.#Case T-662/24.

cjeu_case ·
553

Case T-662/24: Judgment of the General Court of 3 June 2026 – GW v Commission (Civil service – Officials – Retirement pensions – Weighting factor – Resettlement allowance – Decisions of the Swedish courts on the place of residence – Refusal to grant a certificate of residence – Recovery of overpayments – No need to adjudicate in part – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials – Liability)

cjeu_case ·
556

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 3 June 2026.#Lagardère SA v European Commission.#Competition – Concentrations – Request for information – Article 11(3) of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 – Necessity of the information requested – Misuse of powers – Obligation to state reasons – Legal certainty – Proportionality – Impossibilium nulla obligatio est – Article 7 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Right to respect for private and family life – Documents stored on personal communication tools and applications – Article 11 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Freedom of expression – Protection of journalistic sources.#Case T-1119/23.

cjeu_case ·
557

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 3 June 2026.#Lagardère SA v European Commission.#Competition – Concentrations – Request for information – Article 11(3) of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 – Necessity of the information requested – Misuse of powers – Obligation to state reasons – Legal certainty – Proportionality – Impossibilium nulla obligatio est – Article 7 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Right to respect for private and family life – Documents stored on personal communication tools and applications – Article 11 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Freedom of expression – Protection of journalistic sources.#Case T-1119/23.

cjeu_case ·
558

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 3 June 2026.#Vivendi SE v European Commission.#Competition – Concentrations – Request for information – Article 11(3) of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 – Choice of legal base – Misuse of powers – Obligation to state reasons – Not arbitrary – Impossibilium nulla obligatio est – Proportionality – Necessity of the information requested – Article 10 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms – Freedom of expression – Protection of journalistic sources – Plea of illegality – Article 7 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Right to respect for private and family life.#Case T-1097/23.

cjeu_case ·
559

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 3 June 2026.#Vivendi SE v European Commission.#Competition – Concentrations – Request for information – Article 11(3) of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 – Choice of legal base – Misuse of powers – Obligation to state reasons – Not arbitrary – Impossibilium nulla obligatio est – Proportionality – Necessity of the information requested – Article 10 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms – Freedom of expression – Protection of journalistic sources – Plea of illegality – Article 7 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Right to respect for private and family life.#Case T-1097/23.

cjeu_case ·
560

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 3 June 2026.#Meta Platforms, Inc. v European Commission.#Digital services – Regulation EU 2022/1925 – Designation of gatekeepers – Concept of ‘core platform service’ – Online social networking service – Number-independent interpersonal communications service – Online intermediation service – Equal treatment – Article 3(2) and (5) of Regulation 2022/1925 – Important gateway for business users to reach end users – Presumptions – Rebuttal of the presumptions – Article 17(1) and (3) of Regulation 2022/1925 – Conditions for opening a market investigation – Rights of the defence – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-1078/23.

cjeu_case ·