4521Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar delivered on 4 September 2025.###cjeu_case · 4 septembre 2025
4522Opinion of Advocate General Emiliou delivered on 4 September 2025.###cjeu_case · 4 septembre 2025
4524Opinion of Advocate General Ćapeta delivered on 4 September 2025.#V v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Den Haag, zittingsplaats Roermond.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 20 TFEU – Citizenship of the Union – Directive 2008/115/EC – Return of illegally staying third-country nationals – Article 5(a) and (b) – Obligation to take account of the best interests of the child and of family life – Article 6(2) – Decision of the competent authority of the host Member State refusing to grant a derived right of residence on its territory to the third-country national, who is the parent of a minor child who is a Union citizen, and ordering that third-country national to go immediately to another Member State – Interference with the exercise by a Union citizen of his or her right of free movement and residence within the territory of the Member States – Child having never resided in a Member State other than that of which he or she is a national – Derived right of residence of the parent, who is a third-country national, in the Member State of which the child is a national and in which that child resides – Right of residence of that parent in another Member State – Article 7 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to respect for private and family life – Article 24(2) and (3) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Best interests of the child.#Case C-147/24.cjeu_case · 4 septembre 2025
4525Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar delivered on 4 September 2025.#Gesellschaft für musikalische Aufführungs- und mechanische Vervielfältigungsrechte eV (GEMA) v VHC 2 Seniorenresidenz und Pflegeheim gGmbH.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Intellectual property – Copyright and related rights – Directive 2001/29/EC – Article 3(1) – Communication to the public – Concept – Retransmission of a signal via a cable network of a retirement home – Specific technical means – New public.#Case C-127/24.cjeu_case · 4 septembre 2025
4526Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 4 September 2025.#„Vaniz“ EOOD v Direktor na Direktsia „Obzhalvane i danachno-osiguritelna praktika“ – Veliko Tarnovo.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Veliko Tarnovo.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 205 – Joint and several liability – Insolvency of the principal debtor – Continued obligation to pay VAT – Joint and several liability of a third party after the removal of the principal debtor from the commercial register – Principle of legal certainty – Principle of proportionality.#Case C-121/24.cjeu_case · 4 septembre 2025
4527Opinion of Advocate General Emiliou delivered on 4 September 2025.###cjeu_case · 4 septembre 2025
4528Opinion of Advocate General Richard de la Tour delivered on 4 September 2025.###cjeu_case · 4 septembre 2025
4529Opinion of Advocate General Richard de la Tour delivered on 4 September 2025.###cjeu_case · 4 septembre 2025
4530Case C-625/24, ClaimCompass: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 4 September 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad – Bulgaria) – ClaimCompass EOOD (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94(c) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Requirement to provide reasons justifying the need for an answer from the Court – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility)cjeu_case · 4 septembre 2025
4531Case C-451/24, Kwizda Pharma II: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 4 September 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Wien – Austria) – Kwizda Pharma GmbH (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Medicinal products – Product which may fall within the definition of medicinal product and within the definition of product covered by other Community legislation – Applicable legal framework – Directive 2001/83/EC – Article 2(2) – Rule of precedence – Scope – Effectiveness – Procedural autonomy of the Member States – Article 4(3) TEU – Principle of sincere cooperation)cjeu_case · 4 septembre 2025
4532Case C-253/24, Pelavi: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 4 September 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte d’appello di L’Aquila – Italy) – Ministero della Giustizia v NZ (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP – Clause 4 – Principle of non-discrimination – Equal treatment in employment and occupation – Honorary and ordinary members of the judiciary – Clause 5 – Measures intended to prevent and penalise misuse of successive fixed-term contracts – Directive 2003/88/EC – Article 7 – Right to paid annual leave – Article 31 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Assessment procedure in order to be permanently confirmed as an honorary member of the judiciary – Waiver, by operation of law, of claims arising from service as an honorary member of the judiciary prior to the assessment procedure – Loss of a right to paid annual leave conferred by EU law)cjeu_case · 4 septembre 2025
4533Case C-249/24, Ineo Infracom: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 4 September 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation – France) – RT, ED v Ineo Infracom (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Collective redundancies – Directive 98/59/EC – Article 1(1) – Scope – Concept of redundancy – Collective internal mobility agreement – Redundancies for economic reasons based on the refusal to apply that agreement – Termination of the employment contract on the employer’s initiative for one or more reasons not related to the individual workers concerned – Article 2 – Procedures for information and consultation with workers’ representatives)cjeu_case · 4 septembre 2025
4534Case C-211/24, LEGO (Concept of informed user of a design): Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 4 September 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék – Hungary) – LEGO A/S v Pozitív Energiaforrás Kft. (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Community design – Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Article 8(3) – Design allowing the multiple assembly or connection of mutually interchangeable products within a modular system – Scope of the protection conferred by such a design – Article 10 – Concept of informed user – Article 89(1) – Sanctions in actions for infringement – Special reasons allowing the national court not to make the orders provided for in that provision – Infringement in respect of the pieces of a toy building set, the number of which is small in relation to total number of components of that set)cjeu_case · 4 septembre 2025
4535Case C-203/24, Hakamp: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 4 September 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden – Netherlands) – KN v Raad van bestuur van de Sociale verzekeringsbank (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social security – Migrant workers – Legislation applicable – Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 – Article 13(1) – Regulation (EC) No 987/2009 – Article 14(8) and (10) – Worker normally employed in several Member States – Pursuit of less than 25 % of the activity in the Member State of residence – Concept of substantial part of the activity – Connecting factors relating to working time and/or remuneration – Consideration of other circumstances – Length of the assessment period – Discretion of the competent institutions)cjeu_case · 4 septembre 2025
4536Case C-21/24, Nissan Iberia: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 4 September 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Mercantil no 1 de Zaragoza – Spain) – CP v Nissan Iberia SA (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 101 TFEU – Principle of effectiveness – Actions for damages for infringements of the competition law provisions of the Member States and of the European Union – Limitation period – Determination of the dies a quo – Knowledge of the information necessary for bringing an action for damages – Publication on the website of a national competition authority of its decision finding an infringement of the competition rules – Binding effect of a decision of a national competition authority which is not yet final – Suspension or interruption of the limitation period – Stay of the main proceedings before the court hearing an action for damages – Directive 2014/104/EU – Article 10 – Temporal application)cjeu_case · 4 septembre 2025
4537Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 4 September 2025.#S.C. Arcomet Towercranes S.R.L. v Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Bucureşti and Administraţia Fiscală pentru Contribuabili Mijlocii Bucureşti.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Scope of VAT – Article 2(1)(c) – Concept of ‘supplies of services for consideration’ – Commercial services provided within the same group of companies – Transfer price – Articles 168 and 178 – Right to deduct VAT – Supporting documents.#Case C-726/23.cjeu_case · 4 septembre 2025
4538Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 4 September 2025.#S.C. Arcomet Towercranes S.R.L. v Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Bucureşti and Administraţia Fiscală pentru Contribuabili Mijlocii Bucureşti.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bucureşti.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Scope of VAT – Article 2(1)(c) – Concept of ‘supplies of services for consideration’ – Commercial services provided within the same group of companies – Transfer price – Articles 168 and 178 – Right to deduct VAT – Supporting documents.#Case C-726/23.cjeu_case · 4 septembre 2025
4539Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 4 September 2025.#IP v Quirin Privatbank AG.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Rights of the data subject – Article 17 – Right to erasure of data – Article 18 – Right to restriction of processing – Article 79 – Right to an effective judicial remedy – Unlawful processing of personal data – Action seeking an order requiring the controller to refrain from any further unlawful processing in the future – Basis – Conditions – Article 82(1) – Right to compensation – Concept of ‘non-material damage’ – Assessment of the compensation – Possible consideration of the degree of fault on the part of the controller – Possible impact of the grant of a ‘prohibitory injunction’.#Case C-655/23.cjeu_case · 4 septembre 2025
4540Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 4 September 2025.#IP v Quirin Privatbank AG.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Rights of the data subject – Article 17 – Right to erasure of data – Article 18 – Right to restriction of processing – Article 79 – Right to an effective judicial remedy – Unlawful processing of personal data – Action seeking an order requiring the controller to refrain from any further unlawful processing in the future – Basis – Conditions – Article 82(1) – Right to compensation – Concept of ‘non-material damage’ – Assessment of the compensation – Possible consideration of the degree of fault on the part of the controller – Possible impact of the grant of a ‘prohibitory injunction’.#Case C-655/23.cjeu_case · 4 septembre 2025