Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 315 documents
40062

Case T-354/18: Judgment of the General Court of 16 May 2019 — KID-Systeme v EUIPO — Sky (SKYFi) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark SKYFi — Earlier national and EU word marks SKY — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of signs — Identity of goods and services — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Obligation to state reasons — Article 94 of Regulation 2017/1001 — Genuine use of the earlier mark — Article 47(2) and (3) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Suspension of the administrative procedure — Rule 20(7)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 (now Article 71(1) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625) — Misuse of powers — Right to a fair trial — Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights — Oral proceedings before the Board of Appeal — Article 96 of Regulation 2017/1001)

cjeu_case ·
40063

Case T-228/18: Judgment of the General Court of 16 May 2019 — Transtec v Commission (Public service contracts — Tender procedure — Framework contract for the provision of services — Services to third countries benefiting from external aid — Rejection of a tenderer’s bid and award of the contract to other tenderers — Allegations of grave professional misconduct against a tenderer — No final judgment or final administrative decision establishing grave professional misconduct — Conditions for referral to the panel referred to in Article 108 of the Financial Regulation — Abnormally low tenders — Duty to state reasons — Taking into account of a letter sent by the awarding authority after the action had been brought — Right to an effective remedy — Standstill period for bringing an action against the award decision — Equal treatment — Principle of non-discrimination — Articles 105a, 106, 108, 113 and 118 of the Financial Regulation — Non-contractual liability)

cjeu_case ·
40064

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 May 2019.#TE and Others v Luminor Bank AB.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Vilniaus apygardos teismas.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) and Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Freedom to provide services — Markets in financial instruments — Natural person who has acquired a derivative financial instrument from a bank — Classification of that person within the meaning of EU law.#Case C-8/18.

cjeu_case ·
40065

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 May 2019.#Asociación de la pesca y acuicultura del entorno de Doñana y del Bajo Guadalquívir (Pebagua) v European Commission.#Appeal — Environment — Prevention and management of the introduction and spread of invasive alien species — Regulation (EU) No 1143/2014 — Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1141 — Adoption of a list of invasive alien species of Union concern — Inclusion of the species Procambarus clarkii.#Case C-204/18 P.

cjeu_case ·
40068

Opinion of Advocate General Hogan delivered on 16 May 2019.#Société de perception et de distribution des droits des artistes-interprètes de la musique et de la danse (Spedidam) and Others v Institut national de l’audiovisuel.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Copyright and related rights — Directive 2001/29/EC — Exclusive rights of performers — Article 2(b) — Reproduction right — Article 3(2)(a) — Making available to the public — Authorisation — Presumption — National scheme exempting a public institution responsible for the conservation and promotion of the national audiovisual heritage from the requirement to obtain the performer’s written consent for the exploitation of archives containing fixations of that performer’s performances.#Case C-484/18.

cjeu_case ·
40069

Opinion of Advocate General Pikamäe delivered on 16 May 2019.#SF.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant — Article 5(3) — Surrender of the person concerned made subject to a guarantee that that person will be returned to the executing Member State in order to serve there a custodial sentence or a measure involving deprivation of liberty imposed on that person in the issuing Member State — Time of return — Framework Decision 2008/909/JHA — Article 3(3) — Scope — Article 8 — Adaptation of the sentence imposed in the issuing Member State — Article 25 — Enforcement of a sentence under Article 5(3) of Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA.#Case C-314/18.

cjeu_case ·
40071

Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar delivered on 16 May 2019.#SC Petrotel-Lukoil SA v Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală - Direcţia Generală de Administrare a Marilor Contribuabili and Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală – Direcţia Generală de Soluţionare a Contestaţiilor.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bucureşti.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Taxation of energy products and electricity — Directive 2003/96/EC — Article 21(3) — No chargeable event giving rise to taxation — Consumption of energy products on a site that produces such products — Article 2(3) — Obligation to obtain a classification for energy products in order to determine the level of excise duty — Tax rate applicable to those products — Principle of proportionality.#Case C-68/18.

cjeu_case ·
40072

Opinion of Advocate General Pitruzzella delivered on 16 May 2019.#„Elektrorazpredelenie Yug“ EAD v Komisia za energiyno i vodno regulirane (KEVR).#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Sofia-grad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 2009/72/EC — Internal market in electricity — Article 2(3) to (6) — Concepts of electricity transmission system and electricity distribution system — Distinguishing criteria — Voltage — Ownership of installations — Article 17(1)(a) — Independent transmission operator — Articles 24 and 26 — Distribution system operator — Article 32(1) — Free third-party access — Access to medium-voltage electricity — Interconnection points between transmission and distribution systems — Discretion of the Member States.#Case C-31/18.

cjeu_case ·
40073

Case C-8/18: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 May 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Vilniaus apygardos teismas — Lithuania) — TE, UD, YB, ZC v Luminor Bank AB (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) and Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Freedom to provide services — Markets in financial instruments — Natural person who has acquired a derivative financial instrument from a bank — Classification of that person within the meaning of EU law)

cjeu_case ·
40074

Case C-204/18 P: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 May 2019 — Asociación de la pesca y acuicultura del entorno de Doñana y del Bajo Guadalquívir (Pebagua) v European Commission (Appeal — Environment — Prevention and management of the introduction and spread of invasive alien species — Regulation (EU) No 1143/2014 — Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1141 — Adoption of a list of invasive alien species of Union concern — Inclusion of the species Procambarus clarkii)

cjeu_case ·
40077

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 16 May 2019 (Extracts).#GMP-Orphan (GMPO) v European Commission.#Medicinal products for human use – Article 3(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 141/2000 – Definition of ‘significant benefit’ – Availability of orphan medicinal products – Article 5(12)(b) of Regulation No 141/2000 – Commission decision to remove a medicinal product from the Register of Orphan Medicinal Products – Error of assessment – Error of law – Legitimate expectations.#Case T-733/17.

cjeu_case ·
40078

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 16 May 2019 (Extracts).#GMP-Orphan (GMPO) v European Commission.#Medicinal products for human use – Article 3(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 141/2000 – Definition of ‘significant benefit’ – Availability of orphan medicinal products – Article 5(12)(b) of Regulation No 141/2000 – Commission decision to remove a medicinal product from the Register of Orphan Medicinal Products – Error of assessment – Error of law – Legitimate expectations.#Case T-733/17.

cjeu_case ·
40079

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 16 May 2019.#Bank Tejarat v Council of the European Union.#Non-contractual liability — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against Iran — Freezing of funds — Restriction on admission to the territory of the Member States — Compensation for the damage allegedly sustained by the applicant following its inclusion and re-inclusion in the list of persons and entities subject to the restrictive measures at issue — Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals.#Case T-37/17.

cjeu_case ·