39721Case T-702/18: Order of the General Court of 12 June 2019 — Durand and Others v Parliament (Actions for failure to act and for annulment — Agricultural policy — Regulation (EC) No 1/2005 — Animal welfare — Request by Members of the European Parliament to set up an inquiry committee — Defined position of the Parliament — Act not open to challenge — Informative act — Inadmissibility)cjeu_case · 12 juin 2019
39722Case T-346/18: Judgment of the General Court of 12 June 2019 — Advance Magazine Publishers v EUIPO — Enovation Brands (VOGUE) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark VOGUE — Earlier EU word mark VOGA — Suspension of the administrative procedure — Rule 20(7)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 (now Article 71(1) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625) — Rule 50(1) of Regulation No 2868/95)cjeu_case · 12 juin 2019
39723Case T-291/18: Judgment of the General Court of 12 June 2019 — Biedermann Technologies v EUIPO (Compliant Constructs) (EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark Compliant Constructs — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 12 juin 2019
39724Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 12 June 2019.#OY v European Commission.#Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Civil service — Member of the contract staff — Appointment — Classification in grade — Account taken of professional experience — General provisions for implementing Article 79(2) of the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants (CEOS).#Case C-816/18 P.cjeu_case · 12 juin 2019
39725Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 12 June 2019.#Saga Furs Oyj v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for registration of the word sign SAGA — Application lodged with the General Court of the European Union signed by a ‘licensed legal counsel’ — Manifest inadmissibility — Article 19 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union — No representation by a lawyer — Appeal manifestly unfounded).#Case C-805/18 P.cjeu_case · 12 juin 2019
39726Order of the Court (Second Chamber) of 12 June 2019.#María Teresa Aragón Carrasco and Others v Administración del Estado.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) and Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Social policy — Directive 1999/70/EC — Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP — Clause 4 — Principle of non-discrimination — Comparability of situations — Justification — Clause 5 — Compensation in the event of termination of an employment contract of indefinite duration on objective grounds — No compensation upon the termination of the post of workers employed as auxiliary staff.#Case C-367/18.cjeu_case · 12 juin 2019
39727Arrêt de la Cour (première chambre) du 12 juin 2019.#Terre wallonne ASBL contre Région wallonne.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Environnement – Directive 2001/42/CE – Évaluation des incidences environnementales de certains plans et programmes – Arrêté – Fixation des objectifs de conservation pour le réseau Natura 2000, conformément à la directive 92/43/CEE – Notion de “plans et programmes” – Obligation de procéder à une évaluation environnementale.#Affaire C-321/18.cjeu_case · 12 juin 2019
39728Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 June 2019.#Terre wallonne ASBL v Région wallonne.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d'État (Belgium).#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Directive 2001/42/EC — Assessment of the effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment — Decree — Establishment of conservation objectives for the Natura 2000 network, in accordance with Directive 92/43/EEC — Definition of ‘plans and programmes’ — Obligation to undertake an environmental assessment.#Case C-321/18.cjeu_case · 12 juin 2019
39729Arrêt de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 12 juin 2019.#Oro Efectivo SL contre Diputación Foral de Bizkaia.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Taxe sur la valeur ajoutée (TVA) – Directive 2006/112/CE – Article 401 – Principe de neutralité fiscale – Acquisition par une entreprise, auprès de particuliers, d’objets ayant une forte teneur en or ou en autres métaux précieux en vue d’une revente – Impôt sur les transmissions patrimoniales.#Affaire C-185/18.cjeu_case · 12 juin 2019
39730Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 12 June 2019.#Oro Efectivo SL v Diputación Foral de Bizkaia.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Article 401 — Principle of fiscal neutrality — Acquisition by an undertaking, from private individuals, of objects with a high gold or other precious metal content with a view to resale — Duty on transfers of assets.#Case C-185/18.cjeu_case · 12 juin 2019
39731Arrêt de la Cour (première chambre) du 12 juin 2019.#Compagnie d'entreprises CFE SA contre Région de Bruxelles-Capitale.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Environnement – Directive 2001/42/CE – Évaluation des incidences environnementales de certains plans et programmes – Arrêté – Désignation d’une zone spéciale de conservation conformément à la directive 92/43/CEE – Fixation des objectifs de conservation ainsi que de certaines mesures de prévention – Notion de “plans et programmes” – Obligation de procéder à une évaluation environnementale.#Affaire C-43/18.cjeu_case · 12 juin 2019
39732Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 June 2019.#Compagnie d'entreprises CFE SA v Région de Bruxelles-Capitale.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d'État (Belgium).#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Directive 2001/42/EC — Assessment of the effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment — Decree — Designation of a special area of conservation pursuant to Directive 92/43/EEC — Setting of conservation objectives and provision of certain preventive measures — Concept of ‘plans and programmes’ — Obligation to carry out an environmental assessment.#Case C-43/18.cjeu_case · 12 juin 2019
39733Opinion of Advocate General Bot delivered on 12 June 2019.#VIPA Kereskedelmi és Szolgáltató Kft. v Országos Gyógyszerészeti és Élelmezés-egészségügyi Intézet.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Cross-border healthcare – Directive 2011/24/EU – Articles 3(k) and 11(1) – Prescription – Definition – Recognition of a prescription issued in another Member State by an authorised person – Conditions – Free movement of goods – Prohibition of measures having equivalent effect to quantitative restrictions on exports – Articles 35 and 36 TFEU – Restriction on the dispensing by a pharmacy of prescription-only medicinal products – Order form issued in another Member State – Justification – Protection of human health and human life – Directive 2001/83/EC – Second paragraph of Article 81 – Supply of medicinal products to the public of a Member State.#Case C-222/18.cjeu_case · 12 juin 2019
39734Case C-367/18: Order of the Court (Second Chamber) of 12 June 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo — Spain) — María Teresa Aragón Carrasco and Others v Administración del Estado (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) and Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Social policy — Directive 1999/70/EC — Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP — Clause 4 — Principle of non-discrimination — Comparability of situations — Justification — Clause 5 — Compensation in the event of termination for an objective reason of an employment contract for an indefinite period — No compensation upon the termination of the post of workers employed as auxiliary staff)cjeu_case · 12 juin 2019
39735Case C-321/18: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 June 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État — Belgium) — Terre wallonne ASBL v Région wallonne (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Directive 2001/42/EC — Assessment of the effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment — Decree — Establishment of conservation objectives for the Natura 2000 network, in accordance with Directive 92/43/EEC — Definition of ‘plans and programmes’ — Obligation to undertake an environmental assessment)cjeu_case · 12 juin 2019
39736Case C-185/18: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 12 June 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo — Spain) — Oro Efectivo SL v Diputación Foral de Bizkaia (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Article 401 — Principle of fiscal neutrality — Acquisition by an undertaking, from private individuals, of objects with a high gold or other precious metal content with a view to resale — Duty on transfers of assets)cjeu_case · 12 juin 2019
39737Case C-43/18: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 June 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d'État — Belgium) — Compagnie d'entreprises CFE SA v Région de Bruxelles-Capitale (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Directive 2001/42/EC — Assessment of the effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment — Order — Designation of a special area of conservation in accordance with Directive 92/43/EEC — Establishment of conservation objectives and certain preventive measures — Notion of ‘plans and programmes’ — Obligation to undertake an environmental assessment)cjeu_case · 12 juin 2019
39738Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 12 June 2019.#EOS Deutscher Inkasso-Dienst GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark IOS FINANCE — Earlier national figurative mark EOS — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-583/17.cjeu_case · 12 juin 2019
39739Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 12 June 2019.#RV v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Article 42c of the Staff Regulations – Leave in the interests of the service – Automatic retirement – Measure not open to challenge – Partial inadmissibility – Scope of the law – Court acting of its own motion – Literal, contextual and teleological interpretation.#Case T-167/17.cjeu_case · 12 juin 2019
39740Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 12 June 2019.#RV v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Article 42c of the Staff Regulations – Leave in the interests of the service – Automatic retirement – Measure not open to challenge – Partial inadmissibility – Scope of the law – Court acting of its own motion – Literal, contextual and teleological interpretation.#Case T-167/17.cjeu_case · 12 juin 2019