Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 314 documents
3924

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 October 2025.#PMC Vlissingen Netherlands BV v European Commission.#Environment and protection of human health – Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 – Classification, labelling and packaging of certain substances and mixtures – Delegated Regulation (EU) 2024/197 – Classification and labelling of dibutyltin oxide – Criteria for classification of a substance in the hazard class reproductive toxicity, Category 1B – Absence of public consultation on the opinion of ECHA’s Committee for Risk Assessment – No obligation to review – Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 – Read-across – Maternal toxicity – Manifest error of assessment.#Case T-169/24.

cjeu_case ·
3925

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 October 2025.#PMC Vlissingen Netherlands BV v European Commission.#Environment and protection of human health – Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 – Classification, labelling and packaging of certain substances and mixtures – Delegated Regulation (EU) 2024/197 – Classification and labelling of dibutyltin oxide – Criteria for classification of a substance in the hazard class reproductive toxicity, Category 1B – Absence of public consultation on the opinion of ECHA’s Committee for Risk Assessment – No obligation to review – Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 – Read-across – Maternal toxicity – Manifest error of assessment.#Case T-169/24.

cjeu_case ·
3928

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 8 October 2025.#CQ v European Economic and Social Committee.#Civil service – Officials – Psychological harassment – Administrative inquiry – Article 12a of the Staff Regulations – Request for assistance – Rejection of the request – Article 24 of the Staff Regulations – Obligation to state reasons – Impartiality – Right to be heard – Length of the administrative procedure – Reasonable time limit – Error of assessment – Liability – Non-material damage.#Case T-117/24.

cjeu_case ·
3930

Case T-586/24: Judgment of the General Court of 8 October 2025 – Doors Bulgaria v EUIPO – Top Ten (Doors) (EU design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered EU design representing doors – Late filing of the statement setting out the grounds of appeal before the Board of Appeal – Calculation of time limits – Action inadmissible – Article 57 of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 and Article 51(2) of Regulation (EC) No 2245/2002 – Restitutio in integrum – Failure to pay the fee – Article 67(3) of Regulation No 6/2002)

cjeu_case ·
3931

Case T-585/24: Judgment of the General Court of 8 October 2025 – Doors Bulgaria v EUIPO – Top Ten (Doors) (EU design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered EU design representing doors – Late filing of the statement setting out the grounds of appeal before the Board of Appeal – Calculation of time limits – Action inadmissible – Article 57 of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 and Article 51(2) of Regulation (EC) No 2245/2002 – Restitutio in integrum – Failure to pay the fee – Article 67(3) of Regulation No 6/2002 – Related to a counterclaim for a declaration of invalidity – Article 91(2) of Regulation No 6/2002)

cjeu_case ·
3932

Case T-562/24: Judgment of the General Court of 8 October 2025 – Capella v EUIPO – Richemont International (COLORATURA) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark COLORATURA – Earlier national word mark COLORATURA – Priority claim – Concept of first application – Article 34(1) and (4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Legal certainty – Reasonable time)

cjeu_case ·
3935

Case T-169/24: Judgment of the General Court of 8 October 2025 – PMC Vlissingen Netherlands v Commission (Environment and protection of human health – Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 – Classification, labelling and packaging of certain substances and mixtures – Delegated Regulation (EU) 2024/197 – Classification and labelling of dibutyltin oxide – Criteria for classification of a substance in the hazard class reproductive toxicity, Category 1B – Absence of public consultation on the opinion of ECHA’s Committee for Risk Assessment – No obligation to review – Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 – Read-across – Maternal toxicity – Manifest error of assessment)

cjeu_case ·
3937

Case T-117/24: Judgment of the General Court of 8 October 2025 – CQ v EESC (Civil service – Officials – Psychological harassment – Administrative inquiry – Article 12a of the Staff Regulations – Request for assistance – Rejection of the request – Article 24 of the Staff Regulations – Obligation to state reasons – Impartiality – Right to be heard – Length of the administrative procedure – Reasonable time limit – Error of assessment – Liability – Non-material damage)

cjeu_case ·
3938

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber, Extended Composition) of 8 October 2025.#Swissgrid AG v European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators.#Energy – Internal market for electricity – Guideline on electricity balancing – Article 1(6) and (7) of Regulation (EU) 2017/2195 – European platform for the exchange of balancing energy from frequency restoration reserves with automatic activation – Non-participation of the Swiss Transmission System Operator – Appeal brought before the ACER Board of Appeal – Specific conditions and arrangements for appeals – Article 28 of Regulation (EU) 2019/942 – Inadmissibility for lack of standing to bring proceedings before the Board of Appeal – Lack of direct concern – Plea of illegality.#Case T-558/23.

cjeu_case ·
3939

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber, Extended Composition) of 8 October 2025.#Swissgrid AG v European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators.#Energy – Internal market for electricity – Guideline on electricity balancing – Article 1(6) and (7) of Regulation (EU) 2017/2195 – European platform for the exchange of balancing energy from frequency restoration reserves with automatic activation – Non-participation of the Swiss Transmission System Operator – Appeal brought before the ACER Board of Appeal – Specific conditions and arrangements for appeals – Article 28 of Regulation (EU) 2019/942 – Inadmissibility for lack of standing to bring proceedings before the Board of Appeal – Lack of direct concern – Plea of illegality.#Case T-558/23.

cjeu_case ·
3940

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber, Extended Composition) of 8 October 2025.#Swissgrid AG v European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators.#Energy – Internal market for electricity – Guideline on electricity balancing – Article 1(6) and (7) of Regulation (EU) 2017/2195 – European platform for the exchange of balancing energy from frequency restoration reserves with manual activation – Non-participation of the Swiss Transmission System Operator – Appeal brought before the ACER Board of Appeal – Specific conditions and arrangements for appeals – Article 28 of Regulation (EU) 2019/942 – Inadmissibility for lack of standing to bring proceedings before the Board of Appeal – Lack of direct concern – Plea of illegality.#Case T-557/23.

cjeu_case ·