Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 315 documents
38842

Case C-354/18: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 29 July 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Bacău — Romania) — Radu Lucian Rusu and Oana Maria Rusu v SC Blue Air — Airline Management Solutions Srl (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 — Air transport — Denied boarding — Definition of ‘compensation’ and ‘further compensation’ — Type of damage for which compensation is available — Material or non-material damage — Deduction — Further compensation — Assistance — Information provided to passengers)

cjeu_case ·
38845

Case C-38/18: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 29 July 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Bari — Italy) — Criminal proceedings against Massimo Gambino, Shpetim Hyka (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Directive 2012/29/EU — Minimum standards on the rights, support and protection of victims of crime — Articles 16 and 18 — Victim testimony before a criminal court of first instance — Change in the composition of the bench — Requirement for a victim to repeat his oral evidence at the request of one of the parties to the proceedings — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Articles 47 and 48 — Right to a fair trial and rights of the defence — Principle of immediacy — Scope — Victim’s right to protection during criminal proceedings)

cjeu_case ·
38846

Arrêt de la Cour (première chambre) du 29 juillet 2019.#Sumanan Vethanayagam e.a. contre Minister van Buitenlandse Zaken.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Espace de liberté, de sécurité et de justice – Code communautaire des visas – Règlement (CE) no 810/2009 – Article 5 – État membre compétent pour examiner une demande de visa et se prononcer sur elle – Article 8 – Accord de représentation – Article 32, paragraphe 3 – Recours contre une décision de refus de visa – État membre compétent pour statuer sur le recours en cas d’accord de représentation – Titulaires du droit d’introduire un recours.#Affaire C-680/17.

cjeu_case ·
38847

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 29 July 2019.#Sumanan Vethanayagam and Others v Minister van Buitenlandse Zaken.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Den Haag, zittingsplaats Utrecht.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Area of freedom, security and justice — Community Visa code — Regulation (EC) No 810/2009 — Article 5 — Member State competent for examining and deciding on a visa application — Article 8 — Representation arrangement — Article 32(3) — Appeal against a decision to refuse a visa — Member State competent to rule on the appeal where a representation arrangement is in place — Persons entitled to bring an appeal.#Case C-680/17.

cjeu_case ·
38848

Arrêt de la Cour (deuxième chambre) du 29 juillet 2019.#Istituto nazionale della previdenza sociale (INPS) contre Azienda Napoletana Mobilità SpA.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Aides d’État – Aides à l’emploi – Exonération de charges sociales liées à des contrats de formation et de travail – Décision 2000/128/CE – Régimes d’aide portant mesures pour l’emploi mis à exécution par l’Italie – Aides en partie incompatibles avec le marché intérieur – Applicabilité de la décision 2000/128/CE à une entreprise fournissant de manière exclusive des services de transport public local lui ayant été directement attribués par une commune – Article 107, paragraphe 1, TFUE – Notion de “distorsion de la concurrence” – Notion d’“affectation des échanges” entre États membres.#Affaire C-659/17.

cjeu_case ·
38849

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 29 July 2019.#Istituto nazionale della previdenza sociale (INPS) v Azienda Napoletana Mobilità SpA.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — State aid — Employment aid — Exemption from social security contributions in connection with training and work experience contracts — Decision 2000/128/EC — Aid granted by Italy to promote employment — Aid incompatible in part with the internal market — Applicability of Decision 2000/128/EC to an undertaking exclusively providing local public transport services which were directly awarded to it by a municipality — Article 107(1) TFEU — Concept of ‘distortion of competition’ — Concept of ‘effect on trade’ between Member States.#Case C-659/17.

cjeu_case ·
38850

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 29 July 2019.#Bayerische Motoren Werke AG and Freistaat Sachsen v European Commission.#Appeal – State aid – Regional investment aid – Aid for a large investment project – Aid partly incompatible with the internal market – Article 107(3) TFEU – Whether the aid is necessary – Article 108(3) TFEU – Regulation (EC) No 800/2008 – Aid exceeding the individual notification threshold – Notification – Scope of the block exemption – Cross-appeal – Whether an intervention before the General Court of the European Union may proceed – Admissibility.#Case C-654/17 P.

cjeu_case ·
38851

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 29 July 2019.#Bayerische Motoren Werke AG and Freistaat Sachsen v European Commission.#Appeal – State aid – Regional investment aid – Aid for a large investment project – Aid partly incompatible with the internal market – Article 107(3) TFEU – Whether the aid is necessary – Article 108(3) TFEU – Regulation (EC) No 800/2008 – Aid exceeding the individual notification threshold – Notification – Scope of the block exemption – Cross-appeal – Whether an intervention before the General Court of the European Union may proceed – Admissibility.#Case C-654/17 P.

cjeu_case ·
38852

Arrêt de la Cour (quatrième chambre) du 29 juillet 2019.#Hochtief Solutions AG Magyarországi Fióktelepe contre Fővárosi Törvényszék.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Marchés publics – Procédures de recours – Directive 89/665/CEE – Directive 92/13/CEE – Droit à une protection juridictionnelle effective – Principes d’effectivité et d’équivalence – Recours en révision des décisions juridictionnelles méconnaissant le droit de l’Union – Responsabilité des États membres en cas de violation du droit de l’Union par les juridictions nationales – Évaluation du dommage indemnisable.#Affaire C-620/17.

cjeu_case ·
38853

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 29 July 2019.#Hochtief Solutions AG Magyarországi Fióktelepe v Fővárosi Törvényszék.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Székesfehérvári Törvényszék.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Public procurement — Review procedures — Directive 89/665/EEC — Directive 92/13/EEC — Right to effective judicial protection — Principles of effectiveness and equivalence — Action for review of judicial decisions in breach of EU law — Liability of the Member States in the event of infringement of EU law by national courts or tribunals — Assessment of damage eligible for compensation.#Case C-620/17.

cjeu_case ·
38854

Arrêt de la Cour (deuxième chambre) du 29 juillet 2019.#Prenatal SA contre Tribunal Económico Administrativo Regional de Cataluña (TEARC).#Renvoi préjudiciel – Importation de produits textiles déclarés à tort comme étant originaires de Jamaïque – Recouvrement a posteriori de droits à l’importation – Demande de remise des droits – Règlement (CEE) no 2913/92 – Code des douanes communautaire – Article 220, paragraphe 2, sous b), et article 239 – Décision de rejet de la Commission européenne dans un cas particulier – Validité.#Affaire C-589/17.

cjeu_case ·
38855

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 29 July 2019.#Prenatal S.A. v Tribunal Económico Administrativo Regional de Cataluña (TEARC).#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Cataluña.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Imports of textile products incorrectly declared as originating in Jamaica – Post-clearance recovery of import duties – Request for remission of duties – Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 – Common customs code – Article 220(2)(b) and Article 239 – Rejection decision of the European Commission in a special case – Validity.#Case C-589/17.

cjeu_case ·
38856

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 29 July 2019.#Alekszij Torubarov v Bevándorlási és Menekültügyi Hivatal.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common policy on asylum and subsidiary protection — Common procedures for granting international protection — Directive 2013/32/EU — Article 46(3) — Full and ex nunc examination — Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Right to an effective remedy — Extent of the powers of the first-instance court or tribunal — No power to vary — Refusal by the competent administrative or quasi-judicial body to comply with a decision of that court or tribunal.#Case C-556/17.

cjeu_case ·
38857

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 29 July 2019.#Alekszij Torubarov v Bevándorlási és Menekültügyi Hivatal.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Pécsi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common policy on asylum and subsidiary protection — Common procedures for granting international protection — Directive 2013/32/EU — Article 46(3) — Full and ex nunc examination — Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Right to an effective remedy — Extent of the powers of the first-instance court or tribunal — No power to vary — Refusal by the competent administrative or quasi-judicial body to comply with a decision of that court or tribunal.#Case C-556/17.

cjeu_case ·
38858

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 29 July 2019.#Spiegel Online GmbH v Volker Beck.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Copyright and related rights — Directive 2001/29/EC — Information Society — Harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights — Article 5(3) — Exceptions and limitations — Scope — Article 5(3)(c) and (d) — Reporting of current events — Quotations — Use of hyperlinks — Lawfully making available to the public — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 11 — Freedom of expression and of information.#Case C-516/17.

cjeu_case ·
38859

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 29 July 2019.#Spiegel Online GmbH v Volker Beck.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Copyright and related rights — Directive 2001/29/EC — Information Society — Harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights — Article 5(3) — Exceptions and limitations — Scope — Article 5(3)(c) and (d) — Reporting of current events — Quotations — Use of hyperlinks — Lawfully making available to the public — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 11 — Freedom of expression and of information.#Case C-516/17.

cjeu_case ·
38860

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 29 July 2019.#Pelham GmbH and Others v Ralf Hütter and Florian Schneider-Esleben.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Copyright and related rights — Directive 2001/29/EC — Information Society — Harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights — Sampling — Article 2(c) — Phonogram producer — Reproduction right — Reproduction ‘in part’ — Article 5(2) and (3) — Exceptions and limitations — Scope — Article 5(3)(d) — Quotations — Directive 2006/115/EC — Article 9(1)(b) — Distribution right — Fundamental rights — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 13 — Freedom of the arts.#Case C-476/17.

cjeu_case ·