Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 315 documents
38063

Order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 25 September 2019.#Panagiotis Triantafyllopoulos and Others v European Central Bank.#Action for damages — Harm allegedly caused to the applicants due to the absence of supervision of the Achaiki Cooperative Bank by the National Bank of Greece and the ECB — Limitation period — Article 46 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union — Causal link — Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded in law.#Case T-451/18.

cjeu_case ·
38064

Order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 25 September 2019.#Panagiotis Triantafyllopoulos and Others v European Central Bank.#Action for damages — Harm allegedly caused to the applicants due to the absence of supervision of the Achaiki Cooperative Bank by the National Bank of Greece and the ECB — Limitation period — Article 46 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union — Causal link — Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded in law.#Case T-451/18.

cjeu_case ·
38065

Case T-451/18: Order of the General Court of 25 September 2019 — Triantafyllopoulos and Others v ECB (Action for damages — Harm allegedly caused to the applicants due to the absence of supervision of the Achaiki Cooperative Bank by the National Bank of Greece and the ECB — Limitation period — Article 46 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union — Causal link — Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded in law)

cjeu_case ·
38066

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 25 September 2019.#EM Research Organization, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Word mark EM — Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Article 7(1)(c) — Grounds for invalidity — Word mark which consists exclusively of signs or indications which may serve to designate the characteristics of goods or services — Trade mark consisting of an abbreviation.#Case C-728/18 P.

cjeu_case ·
38071

Ordonnance de la Cour (deuxième chambre) du 24 septembre 2019.#Procédure pénale contre QR.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Procédure préjudicielle d’urgence – Coopération judiciaire en matière pénale – Directive (UE) 2016/343 – Article 7, paragraphe 4 – Renforcement de certains aspects de la présomption d’innocence et du droit d’assister à son procès dans le cadre des procédures pénales – Droit de garder le silence et droit de ne pas s’incriminer soi-même – Accord conclu entre le procureur et l’auteur d’une infraction – Approbation d’un tel accord par le juge – Condition – Consentement des autres personnes poursuivies – Charte des droits fondamentaux de l’Union européenne – Inapplicabilité.#Affaire C-467/19 PPU.

cjeu_case ·
38072

Order of the Court (Second Chamber) of 24 September 2019.#Criminal proceedings against QR.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Directive (EU) 2016/343 — Article 7(4) — Strengthening of certain aspects of the presumption of innocence and of the right to be present at the trial in criminal proceedings — Right to remain silent and right not to incriminate oneself — Agreement between the prosecutor and the offender — Approval of such an agreement by the court — Condition — Consent of the other accused persons — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Not applicable.#Case C-467/19 PPU.

cjeu_case ·
38076

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 24 September 2019.#KE v LF.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Arbitral de pe lângă Asociaţia de arbitraj de pe lângă Baroul Cluj.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Right to effective legal protection — Legal precedent — Arbitral tribunal — Manifest inadmissibility and lack of jurisdiction of the Court of Justice — Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice.#Case C-185/19.

cjeu_case ·