37161Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 20 November 2019.#Portuguese Republic v European Commission.#Appeal – European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) – European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) – Expenditure excluded from EU financing – Expenditure incurred by the Portuguese Republic.#Case C-737/18 P.cjeu_case · 20 novembre 2019
37162Arrêt de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 20 novembre 2019.#X contre Belgische Staat.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Espace de liberté, de sécurité et de justice – Politique relative à l’immigration – Droit au regroupement familial – Directive 2003/86/CE – Article 5, paragraphe 4 – Décision concernant la demande de regroupement familial – Conséquences du non-respect du délai de prise de décision – Délivrance automatique d’un titre de séjour.#Affaire C-706/18.cjeu_case · 20 novembre 2019
37163Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 20 November 2019.#X v Belgische Staat.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad voor Vreemdelingenbetwistingen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Area of freedom, security and justice — Immigration policy — Right to family reunification — Directive 2003/86/EC — Article 5(4) — Decision concerning the application for family reunification — Consequences of failure to comply with the time limit for taking a decision — Automatic issue of a residence permit.#Case C-706/18.cjeu_case · 20 novembre 2019
37164Arrêt de la Cour (deuxième chambre) du 20 novembre 2019.#Infohos contre Belgische Staat.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Fiscalité – Taxe sur la valeur ajoutée (TVA) – Sixième directive 77/388/CEE – Article 13, A, paragraphe 1, sous f) – Exonérations – Prestations de services effectuées par des groupements autonomes de personnes – Services fournis aux membres et aux non-membres.#Affaire C-400/18.cjeu_case · 20 novembre 2019
37165Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 20 November 2019.#Infohos v Belgische Staat.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van Cassatie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Value added tax (VAT) – Sixth Directive 77/388/EEC – Article 13A(1)(f) – Exemptions – Services supplied by independent groups of persons – Services provided to members and non-members.#Case C-400/18.cjeu_case · 20 novembre 2019
37166Case C-522/18: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 20 November 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato — Italy) — Indaco Service Soc. coop. sociale, acting in its own name and as agent of Coop. sociale il Melograno v Ufficio Territoriale del Governo Taranto (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Public procurement — Directive 2014/24/EU — Article 57(4)(c) and (g) — Award of public service contracts — Optional grounds for exclusion — Grave professional misconduct — Calling into question the economic operator’s integrity — Prior contract — Performance — Breaches — Termination — Judicial remedy — Contracting authority’s assessment of the contractual breach — Preclusion until the end of the judicial proceedings)cjeu_case · 20 novembre 2019
37167Case C-737/18 P: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 20 November 2019 — Portuguese Republic v European Commission (Appeal — European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) — European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) — Expenditure excluded from EU financing — Expenditure incurred by the Portuguese Republic)cjeu_case · 20 novembre 2019
37168Case C-706/18: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 20 November 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad voor Vreemdelingenbetwistingen — Belgium) — X v Belgische Staat (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Area of freedom, security and justice — Immigration policy — Right to family reunification — Directive 2003/86/EC — Article 5(4) — Decision concerning the application for family reunification — Consequences of failure to comply with the time limit for taking a decision — Automatic issue of a residence permit)cjeu_case · 20 novembre 2019
37169Case C-400/18: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 20 November 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van Cassatie — Belgium) — Infohos v Belgische Staat (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Taxation — Value added tax (VAT) — Sixth Directive 77/388/EEC — Article 13A(1)(f) — Exemptions — Supply of services by independent groups of persons — Services supplied to members and non-members)cjeu_case · 20 novembre 2019
37170Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 20 November 2019 (Extracts).#Stefano Missir Mamachi di Lusignano, as heir to Livio Missir Mamachi di Lusignano and Others v European Commission.#Civil service — Officials — Murder of an official and his wife — Obligation to ensure the safety of staff in the service of the European Union — Liability of the institution for non-material damage suffered by the family members of a deceased official — Mother, brother and sister of the official — Action for damages — Admissibility — Standing to bring proceedings under Article 270 TFEU — Person covered by the Staff Regulations — Reasonable period of time.#Case T-502/16.cjeu_case · 20 novembre 2019
37171Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 20 November 2019 (Extracts).#Stefano Missir Mamachi di Lusignano, as heir to Livio Missir Mamachi di Lusignano and Others v European Commission.#Civil service — Officials — Murder of an official and his wife — Obligation to ensure the safety of staff in the service of the European Union — Liability of the institution for non-material damage suffered by the family members of a deceased official — Mother, brother and sister of the official — Action for damages — Admissibility — Standing to bring proceedings under Article 270 TFEU — Person covered by the Staff Regulations — Reasonable period of time.#Case T-502/16.cjeu_case · 20 novembre 2019
37172Case T-502/16: Judgment of the General Court of 20 November 2019 — Missir Mamachi di Lusignano and Others v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Murder of an official and his wife — Obligation to ensure the safety of staff in the service of the European Union — Liability of the institution for non-material damage suffered by the family members of a deceased official — Mother, brother and sister of the official — Action for damages — Admissibility — Standing to bring proceedings under Article 270 TFEU — Person covered by the Staff Regulations — Reasonable period of time)cjeu_case · 20 novembre 2019
37173Case T-803/19: Action brought on 19 November 2019 — etc-gaming and Casino-Equipment v Commissioncjeu_case · 19 novembre 2019
37174Case T-802/19: Action brought on 19 November 2019 — Kisscolor Living v EUIPO — Teoxane (KISS COLOR)cjeu_case · 19 novembre 2019
37175Case T-797/19: Action brought on 19 November 2019 — Anglo Austrian AAB Bank and Belegging-Maatschappij ‘Far-East’ v ECBcjeu_case · 19 novembre 2019
37178Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may succeed) of 19 November 2019.#Klaus Nonnemacher v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal — EU trade mark — Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed — Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law — Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-660/19 P.cjeu_case · 19 novembre 2019
37179Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may succeed) of 19 November 2019.#Klaus Nonnemacher v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal — EU trade mark — Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed — Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law — Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-660/19 P.cjeu_case · 19 novembre 2019
37180Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may succeed) of 19 November 2019.#Klaus Nonnemacher v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal — EU trade mark — Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed — Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law — Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-659/19 P.cjeu_case · 19 novembre 2019