Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 315 documents
36283

Arrêt de la Cour (dixième chambre) du 22 janvier 2020.#AT contre Pensionsversicherungsanstalt.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Libre circulation des personnes – Citoyenneté de l’Union – Droit de libre circulation et de libre séjour sur le territoire des États membres – Directive 2004/38/CE – Article 17, paragraphe 1, sous a) – Droit de séjour permanent – Acquisition avant l’écoulement d’une période ininterrompue de cinq ans de séjour – Travailleur ayant atteint, au moment où il cesse son activité, l’âge pour faire valoir ses droits à une pension de vieillesse.#Affaire C-32/19.

cjeu_case ·
36284

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 22 January 2020.#AT v Pensionsversicherungsanstalt.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Freedom of movement for persons — Citizenship of the Union — Right to move and reside freely in the territory of the Member States — Directive 2004/38/EC — Article 17(1)(a) — Right of permanent residence — Acquisition before completion of a continuous period of five years of residence — Workers who, at the time they stop working, have reached the age for entitlement to an old age pension.#Case C-32/19.

cjeu_case ·
36286

Case C-32/19: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 22 January 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof — Austria) — AT v Pensionsversicherungsanstalt (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Freedom of movement for persons — Citizenship of the Union — Right to move and reside freely in the territory of the Member States — Directive 2004/38/EC — Article 17(1)(a) — Right of permanent residence — Acquisition before completion of a continuous period of five years of residence — Workers who, at the time they stop working, have reached the age for entitlement to an old age pension)

cjeu_case ·
36289

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 22 January 2020.#Republic of Lithuania v European Commission.#EAGF and EAFRD — Expenditure excluded from financing — Expenditure incurred by Lithuania — One-off and flat-rate financial corrections — Rural development — Cross-compliance control system — Administrative control — On-the-spot check — Quality of the checks — Quality of the applicants — Artificial conditions — Reasonableness of the costs — Expenditure incurred through projects — Risk analysis — Risk factors — Tolerance regarding penalties which is not provided for under EU legislation — Assessment and penalty system which is too lenient — Annual statistical control data.#Case T-19/18.

cjeu_case ·
36290

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 22 January 2020.#Republic of Lithuania v European Commission.#EAGF and EAFRD — Expenditure excluded from financing — Expenditure incurred by Lithuania — One-off and flat-rate financial corrections — Rural development — Cross-compliance control system — Administrative control — On-the-spot check — Quality of the checks — Quality of the applicants — Artificial conditions — Reasonableness of the costs — Expenditure incurred through projects — Risk analysis — Risk factors — Tolerance regarding penalties which is not provided for under EU legislation — Assessment and penalty system which is too lenient — Annual statistical control data.#Case T-19/18.

cjeu_case ·
36293

Case T-19/18: Judgment of the General Court of 22 January 2020 — Lithuania v Commission (EAGF and EAFRD — Expenditure excluded from financing — Expenditure incurred by Lithuania — One-off and flat-rate financial corrections — Rural development — Cross-compliance control system — Administrative control — On-the-spot check — Quality of the checks — Quality of the applicants — Artificial conditions — Reasonableness of the costs — Expenditure incurred through projects — Risk analysis — Risk factors — Tolerance regarding penalties which is not provided for under EU legislation — Assessment and penalty system which is too lenient — Annual statistical control data)

cjeu_case ·
36294

Arrêt de la Cour (septième chambre) du 22 janvier 2020.#Ursa Major Services BV contre Minister van Landbouw, Natuur en Voedselkwaliteit.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Politique commune de la pêche – Règlement (CE) no 1198/2006 – Article 55, paragraphe 1 – Contribution financière du Fonds européen pour la pêche (FEP) – Éligibilité des dépenses – Condition – Dépense ayant été effectivement payée par les bénéficiaires – Notion.#Affaire C-814/18.

cjeu_case ·
36295

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 22 January 2020.#Ursa Major Services BV v Minister van Landbouw, Natuur en Voedselkwaliteit.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the College van Beroep voor het bedrijfsleven.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common fisheries policy — Regulation (EC) No 1198/2006 — Article 55(1) — Financial contribution by the European Fisheries Fund (EFF) — Eligibility of expenditure — Condition — Expenditure actually paid by the beneficiaries — Meaning.#Case C-814/18.

cjeu_case ·
36296

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 22 January 2020.#MSD Animal Health Innovation GmbH and Intervet International BV v European Medicines Agency.#Appeal — Access to documents of EU institutions, bodies, offices or agencies — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — First indent of Article 4(2) — Exception relating to the protection of commercial interests — Article 4(3) — Protection of the decision-making process — Documents submitted to the European Medicines Agency in the context of a marketing authorisation application for a veterinary medicinal product — Decision to grant a third party access to the documents — General presumption of confidentiality — No obligation for an EU institution, body, office or agency to apply a general presumption of confidentiality.#Case C-178/18 P.

cjeu_case ·
36297

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 22 January 2020.#MSD Animal Health Innovation GmbH and Intervet International BV v European Medicines Agency.#Appeal — Access to documents of EU institutions, bodies, offices or agencies — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — First indent of Article 4(2) — Exception relating to the protection of commercial interests — Article 4(3) — Protection of the decision-making process — Documents submitted to the European Medicines Agency in the context of a marketing authorisation application for a veterinary medicinal product — Decision to grant a third party access to the documents — General presumption of confidentiality — No obligation for an EU institution, body, office or agency to apply a general presumption of confidentiality.#Case C-178/18 P.

cjeu_case ·
36298

Arrêt de la Cour (deuxième chambre) du 22 janvier 2020.#Almudena Baldonedo Martín contre Ayuntamiento de Madrid.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Politique sociale – Directive 1999/70/CE – Accord-cadre CES, UNICE et CEEP sur le travail à durée déterminée – Clause 4 – Principe de non-discrimination – Clause 5 – Mesures visant à prévenir les abus résultant de l’utilisation de contrats ou de relations de travail à durée déterminée successifs – Indemnité en cas cessation de la relation de travail – Articles 151 et 153 TFUE – Articles 20 et 21 de la charte des droits fondamentaux de l’Union européenne – Applicabilité – Différence de traitement fondée sur la nature publique ou privée, au sens du droit national, du régime gouvernant la relation de travail.#Affaire C-177/18.

cjeu_case ·
36299

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 22 January 2020.#Almudena Baldonedo Martín v Ayuntamiento de Madrid.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado Contencioso-Administrativo de Madrid.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 1999/70/EC — Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP — Clause 4 — Principle of non-discrimination — Clause 5 — Measures to prevent abuse arising from the use of successive fixed-term employment contracts or relationships — Compensation if the employment relationship is terminated — Articles 151 and 153 TFEU — Articles 20 and 21 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Applicability — Difference of treatment based on whether a public or private regime, within the meaning of national law, governs the employment relationship.#Case C-177/18.

cjeu_case ·
36300

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 22 January 2020.#PTC Therapeutics International Ltd v European Medicines Agency.#Appeal — Access to documents of EU institutions, bodies, offices or agencies — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — First indent of Article 4(2) — Exception relating to the protection of commercial interests — Article 4(3) — Protection of the decision-making process — Documents submitted to the European Medicines Agency in the context of a marketing authorisation application for a medicinal product for human use — Decision to grant a third party access to the documents — General presumption of confidentiality — No obligation for an EU institution, body, office or agency to apply a general presumption of confidentiality.#Case C-175/18 P.

cjeu_case ·