Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 315 documents
35644

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 5 March 2020.#Dekoback GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU word mark DECOPAC — Genuine use of the mark — Article 51(1)(a) and (2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Evidence — Second sentence of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009 (now second sentence of Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001) — Right to be heard.#Case T-80/19.

cjeu_case ·
35645

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 5 March 2020.#Dekoback GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU word mark DECOPAC — Genuine use of the mark — Article 51(1)(a) and (2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Evidence — Second sentence of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009 (now second sentence of Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001) — Right to be heard.#Case T-80/19.

cjeu_case ·
35648

Case T-80/19: Judgment of the General Court of 5 March 2020 — Dekoback v EUIPO — DecoPac (DECOPAC) (EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU word mark DECOPAC — Genuine use of the mark — Article 51(1)(a) and (2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Evidence — Article 75, second sentence, of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 94(1), second sentence, of Regulation 2017/1001) — Right to be heard)

cjeu_case ·
35649

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 5 March 2020.#European Commission v Republic of Cyprus.#Failure of Member State to fulfil obligations – Article 258 TFEU – Directive 91/271/EEC – Treatment of urban waste water – Articles 3, 4, 10 and 15 – Annex I, points A, B and D – No collecting systems for urban waste water in certain agglomerations – No secondary or equivalent treatment of urban waste water – Construction and operation of treatment plants – Control of discharges from such plants.#Case C-248/19.

cjeu_case ·
35650

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 5 March 2020.#European Commission v Republic of Cyprus.#Failure of Member State to fulfil obligations – Article 258 TFEU – Directive 91/271/EEC – Treatment of urban waste water – Articles 3, 4, 10 and 15 – Annex I, points A, B and D – No collecting systems for urban waste water in certain agglomerations – No secondary or equivalent treatment of urban waste water – Construction and operation of treatment plants – Control of discharges from such plants.#Case C-248/19.

cjeu_case ·
35651

Arrêt de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 5 mars 2020.#Pensionsversicherungsanstalt contre CW.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Sécurité sociale des travailleurs migrants – Coordination des systèmes de sécurité sociale – Règlement (CE) no 883/2004 – Articles 3 et 11 – Champ d’application matériel – Prestations relevant du champ d’application de ce règlement – Qualification – Prestation de maladie – Prestation d’invalidité – Prestation de chômage – Personne ayant cessé d’être affiliée à la sécurité sociale d’un État membre après y avoir arrêté son activité professionnelle et avoir déplacé sa résidence dans un autre État membre – Demande visant à bénéficier d’une allocation de rééducation dans l’ancien État membre de résidence et d’emploi – Refus – Détermination de la législation applicable.#Affaire C-135/19.

cjeu_case ·
35652

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 5 March 2020.#Pensionsversicherungsanstalt v CW.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social security for migrant workers — Coordination of social security systems — Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 — Articles 3 and 11 — Matters covered — Benefits falling within the scope of the regulation — Classification — Sickness benefit — Invalidity benefit — Unemployment benefit — Person who has ceased to be insured under the social security system of a Member State after ceasing to be employed there and moving his or her place of residence to another Member State — Application for a rehabilitation allowance in the former Member State of residence and employment — Refusal — Determination of the legislation applicable.#Case C-135/19.

cjeu_case ·
35653

Arrêt de la Cour (deuxième chambre) du 5 mars 2020.#Viasat UK Ltd et Viasat Inc. contre Institut belge des services postaux et des télécommunications (IBPT).#Renvoi préjudiciel – Rapprochement des législations – Secteur des télécommunications – Utilisation harmonisée du spectre radioélectrique dans les bandes de fréquences de 2 GHz pour la mise en œuvre de systèmes fournissant des services mobiles par satellite – Décision no 626/2008/CE – Article 4, paragraphe 1, sous c), article 7, paragraphe 1, et article 8, paragraphe 1 – Éléments terrestres complémentaires – Autorisations délivrées par les États membres – Obligation pour l’opérateur de desservir un certain pourcentage de la population et du territoire – Non-respect – Incidence.#Affaire C-100/19.

cjeu_case ·
35654

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 5 March 2020.#Viasat UK Ltd and Viasat Inc. v Institut belge des services postaux et des télécommunications (IBPT).#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d'appel de Bruxelles.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Approximation of laws — Telecommunications sector — Harmonised use of radio spectrum in the 2 GHz frequency bands for the implementation of systems providing mobile satellite services — Decision No 626/2008/EC — Article 4(1)(c), Article 7(1), and Article 8(1) — Complementary ground components — Authorisations issued by Member States — Requirement for operators to provide service coverage for a certain percentage of the population and the territory — Non-compliance — Effect.#Case C-100/19.

cjeu_case ·
35655

Arrêt de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 5 mars 2020.#Credito Fondiario SpA contre Conseil de résolution unique (CRU).#Pourvoi – Union économique et monétaire – Union bancaire – Redressement et résolution des établissements de crédit et des entreprises d’investissement – Mécanisme de résolution unique des établissements de crédit et de certaines entreprises d’investissement (MRU) – Conseil de résolution unique (CRU) – Fonds de résolution unique (FRU) – Fixation de la contribution ex ante pour l’exercice 2016 – Recours en annulation – Délai de recours – Tardiveté – Exception d’illégalité – Irrecevabilité manifeste.#Affaire C-69/19 P.

cjeu_case ·
35656

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 5 March 2020.#Credito Fondiario SpA v Single Resolution Board.#Appeal — Economic and monetary union — Banking union — Recovery and resolution of credit institutions and investment firms — Single resolution mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) — Single Resolution Board (SRB) — Single Resolution Fund (SRF) — Determination of the 2016 ex ante contribution — Action for annulment — Period within which proceedings must be commenced — Plea of illegality — Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-69/19 P.

cjeu_case ·
35657

Arrêt de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 5 mars 2020.#X-GmbH contre Finanzamt Z.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Fiscalité – Système commun de taxe sur la valeur ajoutée – Directive 2006/112/CE – Article 132, paragraphe 1, sous c) – Exonérations – Prestations de soins à la personne effectuées dans le cadre de l’exercice des professions médicales et paramédicales – Prestations par téléphone – Prestations fournies par des infirmiers et des assistants médicaux.#Affaire C-48/19.

cjeu_case ·
35658

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 5 March 2020.#X-GmbH v Finanzamt Z.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Common system of value added tax – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 132(1)(c) – Exemptions – Provision of medical care in the exercise of the medical and paramedical professions – Providing services by telephone – Services provided by nurses and medical assistants.#Case C-48/19.

cjeu_case ·
35659

Opinion of Advocate General Pitruzzella delivered on 5 March 2020.#Ministre de l'Agriculture et de l'Alimentation v Compagnie des pêches de Saint-Malo.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d'État (France).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – State aid – Concept – Wreck of the oil tanker Erika – Aid scheme for aquaculture and fisheries undertakings – Decision declaring the aid scheme partly incompatible with the common market and ordering the recovery of the aid paid out – Assessment of validity – Examination of the Court’s own motion – Admissibility – Failure to bring an action for annulment by the defendant in the main proceedings – Reduction in social security contributions – Employees’ contributions – Advantage – Question of who is liable for repayment.#Case C-212/19.

cjeu_case ·