34801Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 13 May 2020.#Global Brand Holdings, LLC v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Application for the EU word mark XOXO — Absolute ground for refusal — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-503/19.cjeu_case · 13 mai 2020
34802Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 13 May 2020.#adp Gauselmann GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark City Mania — Earlier EU word mark City Lights — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-381/19.cjeu_case · 13 mai 2020
34803Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 13 May 2020.#adp Gauselmann GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark City Mania — Earlier EU word mark City Lights — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-381/19.cjeu_case · 13 mai 2020
34804Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 13 May 2020.#Divaro, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark IPANEMA — Earlier EU figurative mark Ipanema — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-288/19.cjeu_case · 13 mai 2020
34805Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 13 May 2020.#Divaro, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark IPANEMA — Earlier EU figurative mark Ipanema — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-288/19.cjeu_case · 13 mai 2020
34806Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 13 May 2020.#Wonder Line, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark KENWELL — Earlier EU word mark KENWOOD — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-284/19.cjeu_case · 13 mai 2020
34807Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 13 May 2020.#Wonder Line, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark KENWELL — Earlier EU word mark KENWOOD — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-284/19.cjeu_case · 13 mai 2020
34808Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 13 May 2020.#Cognac Ferrand v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Application for a three-dimensional EU trade mark — Shape of braiding on a bottle — Absolute ground for refusal — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-172/19.cjeu_case · 13 mai 2020
34809Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 13 May 2020.#Cognac Ferrand v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Application for a three-dimensional EU trade mark — Shape of braiding on a bottle — Absolute ground for refusal — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-172/19.cjeu_case · 13 mai 2020
34810Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 13 May 2020.#Koenig & Bauer AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark we’re on it — Absolute grounds for refusal — No distinctive character — Trade mark consisting of an advertising slogan — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Obligation to state reasons — Article 94 of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-156/19.cjeu_case · 13 mai 2020
34811Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 13 May 2020.#Koenig & Bauer AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark we’re on it — Absolute grounds for refusal — No distinctive character — Trade mark consisting of an advertising slogan — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Obligation to state reasons — Article 94 of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-156/19.cjeu_case · 13 mai 2020
34812Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 13 May 2020.#SolNova AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark BIO‑INSECT Shocker – Absolute ground for refusal – Mark likely to deceive the public – Article 7(1)(g) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009.#Case T-86/19.cjeu_case · 13 mai 2020
34813Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 13 May 2020.#SolNova AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark BIO‑INSECT Shocker – Absolute ground for refusal – Mark likely to deceive the public – Article 7(1)(g) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009.#Case T-86/19.cjeu_case · 13 mai 2020
34814Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 13 May 2020.#Pontinova AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark pontinova — Earlier national word mark PONTI — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Relevant public — Similarity of the services — Similarity of the signs — Global assessment of the likelihood of confusion.#Case T-76/19.cjeu_case · 13 mai 2020
34815Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 13 May 2020.#Pontinova AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark pontinova — Earlier national word mark PONTI — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Relevant public — Similarity of the services — Similarity of the signs — Global assessment of the likelihood of confusion.#Case T-76/19.cjeu_case · 13 mai 2020
34816Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 13 May 2020.#Rot Front OAO v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition Proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Figurative mark РОШЕН — Earlier international figurative mark РОМАШКИ — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-63/19.cjeu_case · 13 mai 2020
34817Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 13 May 2020.#Rot Front OAO v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition Proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Figurative mark РОШЕН — Earlier international figurative mark РОМАШКИ — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-63/19.cjeu_case · 13 mai 2020
34818Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 13 May 2020.#View, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — International registration designating the European Union — Word mark CREATE DELIGHTFUL HUMAN ENVIRONMENTS — Trade mark consisting of an advertising slogan — Absolute ground for refusal — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-49/19.cjeu_case · 13 mai 2020
34819Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 13 May 2020.#View, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — International registration designating the European Union — Word mark CREATE DELIGHTFUL HUMAN ENVIRONMENTS — Trade mark consisting of an advertising slogan — Absolute ground for refusal — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-49/19.cjeu_case · 13 mai 2020
34820Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 13 May 2020.#Clatronic International GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — International registration designating the European Union — Figurative mark PROFI CARE — Absolute grounds for refusal — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-5/19.cjeu_case · 13 mai 2020