Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 315 documents
34001

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 8 July 2020.#VQ v European Central Bank.#Economic and monetary policy — Prudential supervision of credit institutions — Article 18(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 — Administrative pecuniary penalty imposed by the ECB on a credit institution for infringement of Article 77(a) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 — Rules for publication on the ECB’s website — Article 18(6) of Regulation No 1024/2013 and Article 132(1) of Regulation (EU) No 468/2014.#Case T-203/18.

cjeu_case ·
34004

Case T-578/18: Judgment of the General Court of 8 July 2020 — CA Consumer Finance v ECB (Economic and monetary policy — Prudential supervision of credit institutions — Article 18(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 — Administrative pecuniary penalty imposed by the ECB on a credit institution — First subparagraph of Article 26(3) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 — Continued breach of capital requirements — Negligent breach — Rights of defence — Amount of the penalty — Obligation to state reasons)

cjeu_case ·
34005

Case T-577/18: Judgment of the General Court of 8 July 2020 — Crédit agricole Corporate and Investment Bank v ECB (Economic and monetary policy — Prudential supervision of credit institutions — Article 18(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 — Administrative pecuniary penalty imposed by the ECB on a credit institution — First subparagraph of Article 26(3) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 — Continued breach of capital requirements — Negligent breach — Rights of defence — Amount of the penalty — Obligation to state reasons)

cjeu_case ·
34006

Case T-576/18: Judgment of the General Court of 8 July 2020 — Crédit agricole v ECB (Economic and monetary policy — Prudential supervision of credit institutions — Article 18(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 — Administrative pecuniary penalty imposed by the ECB on a credit institution — First subparagraph of Article 26(3) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 — Continued breach of capital requirements — Negligent breach — Retroactive application of less severe enforcement legislation — Absence — Rights of defence — Amount of the penalty — Obligation to state reasons)

cjeu_case ·
34007

Case T-490/18: Judgment of the General Court of 8 July 2020 –Neda Industrial Group v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken against Iran with the aim of preventing nuclear proliferation — Freezing of funds — Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources — Obligation to state reasons — Error of law — Error of assessment — Temporal adjustment of the effects of an annulment)

cjeu_case ·
34008

Case T-429/18: Judgment of the General Court of 8 July 2020 — BRF and SHB Comércio e Indústria de Alimentos v Commission (Public health — Specific rules for the organisation of official controls on products of animal origin intended for human consumption — Amendment of the lists of third country establishments from which imports of specified products of animal origin are permitted, regarding certain establishments from Brazil — Article 12(4)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 854/2004 — Comitology — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of defence — Powers of the Commission — Equal treatment — Proportionality)

cjeu_case ·
34009

Case T-203/18: Judgment of the General Court of 8 July 2020 — VQ v ECB (Economic and monetary policy — Prudential supervision of credit institutions — Article 18(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 — Administrative pecuniary penalty imposed by the ECB on a credit institution for infringement of Article 77(a) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 — Rules for publication on the ECB’s website — Article 18(6) of Regulation No 1024/2013 and Article 132(1) of Regulation (EU) No 468/2014)

cjeu_case ·
34016

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 8 July 2020.#Infineon Technologies AG v European Commission.#Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for smart card chips – Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU – Exchanges of commercially sensitive information – Unlimited jurisdiction – Calculation of the amount of the fine – Taking into consideration of the participation only in a part of a network of bilateral contacts between competitors.#Case T-758/14 RENV.

cjeu_case ·
34017

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 8 July 2020.#Infineon Technologies AG v European Commission.#Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for smart card chips – Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU – Exchanges of commercially sensitive information – Unlimited jurisdiction – Calculation of the amount of the fine – Taking into consideration of the participation only in a part of a network of bilateral contacts between competitors.#Case T-758/14 RENV.

cjeu_case ·
34018

Case T-758/14 RENV: Judgment of the General Court of 8 July 2020 — Infineon Technologies v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market for smart card chips — Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU — Exchanges of commercially sensitive information — Unlimited jurisdiction — Calculation of the amount of the fine — Taking into consideration of the participation only in a part of a network of bilateral contacts between competitors)

cjeu_case ·