Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 315 documents
32701

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 October 2020.#EU v PE Digital GmbH.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Hamburg.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 2011/83/EU – Point 11 of Article 2, Article 14(3) and Article 16(m) – Distance contract – Supply of digital content and digital services – Right of withdrawal – Obligations of the consumer in the event of withdrawal – Determination of the amount to be paid by the consumer for the services provided before the exercise of the right of withdrawal – Exception to the right of withdrawal in the case of the supply of digital content.#Case C-641/19.

cjeu_case ·
32702

Arrêt de la Cour (quatrième chambre) du 8 octobre 2020.#kohlpharma GmbH contre Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Articles 34 et 36 TFUE – Libre circulation des marchandises – Restrictions quantitatives – Mesures d’effet équivalent – Refus d’approuver une modification des renseignements et des documents relatifs à un médicament faisant l’objet d’une autorisation d’importation parallèle – Protection de la santé et de la vie des personnes – Directive 2001/83/CE.#Affaire C-602/19.

cjeu_case ·
32703

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 8 October 2020.#kohlpharma GmbH v Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Köln.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Articles 34 and 36 TFEU – Free movement of goods – Quantitative restrictions – Measures having equivalent effect – Refusal to approve an amendment to the particulars and documents relating to a medicinal product which is the subject of a parallel import licence – Protection of the health and life of humans – Directive 2001/83/EC.#Case C-602/19.

cjeu_case ·
32704

Arrêt de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 8 octobre 2020.#MO contre Subdelegación del Gobierno en Toledo.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Espace de liberté, de sécurité et de justice – Directive 2008/115/CE – Normes et procédures communes en matière de retour des ressortissants de pays tiers en séjour irrégulier – Article 6, paragraphe 1, et article 8, paragraphe 1 – Séjour irrégulier – Réglementation nationale prévoyant d’imposer, selon les circonstances, soit une amende, soit l’éloignement – Conséquences de l’arrêt du 23 avril 2015, Zaizoune (C‑38/14, EU:C:2015:260) – Législation nationale plus favorable pour l’intéressé – Effet direct des directives – Limites.#Affaire C-568/19.

cjeu_case ·
32705

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 October 2020.#MO v Subdelegación del Gobierno en Toledo.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Castilla-La Mancha.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Directive 2008/115/EC – Common standards and procedures for returning illegally staying third-country nationals – Article 6(1) and Article 8(1) – Illegal stay – National legislation providing for either a fine or removal, depending on the circumstances – Consequences of the judgment of 23 April 2015, Zaizoune (C‑38/14, EU:C:2015:260) – National legislation more favourable to the interested party – Direct effect of directives – Limits.#Case C-568/19.

cjeu_case ·
32706

Arrêt de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 8 octobre 2020.#Impresa Pizzarotti & C SPA Italia Sucursala Cluj contre Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală – Direcţia Generală de Administrare a Marilor Contribuabili.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Articles 49 et 63 TFUE – Liberté d’établissement – Libre circulation des capitaux – Détermination du revenu imposable des sociétés – Personnes se trouvant dans une situation d’interdépendance – Avantage anormal consenti par une succursale résidente à une société non-résidente – Rectification des revenus imposables de la succursale d’une société non-résidente – Absence de rectification des revenus imposables en cas d’avantage identique octroyé par sa succursale à une société résidente – Principe de libre concurrence – Restriction à la liberté d’établissement – Justification – Répartition équilibrée du pouvoir d’imposition entre les États membres – Proportionnalité.#Affaire C-558/19.

cjeu_case ·
32707

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 October 2020.#Impresa Pizzarotti & C SpA Italia Sucursala Cluj v Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală - Direcţia Generală de Administrare a Marilor Contribuabili.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Cluj.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Articles 49 and 63 TFEU – Freedom of establishment – Free movement of capital – Calculation of the taxable income of companies – Persons having a relationship of interdependence – Unusual advantage granted by a resident branch to a non-resident company – Correction of the taxable income of the branch of a non-resident company – No correction of taxable income in the event of an identical advantage granted by a branch to a resident company – Principle of free competition – Restriction on freedom of establishment – Justification – Balanced allocation of the power to tax between Member States – Proportionality.#Case C-558/19.

cjeu_case ·
32708

Arrêt de la Cour (première chambre) du 8 octobre 2020.#Union des industries de la protection des plantes contre Premier ministre e.a.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Environnement – Règlement (CE) no 1107/2009 – Mise sur le marché des produits phytopharmaceutiques – Mesures d’urgence – Information officielle de la Commission européenne – Directive (UE) 2015/1535 – Procédure d’information dans le domaine des réglementations techniques – Néonicotinoïdes – Protection des abeilles – Principe de coopération loyale.#Affaire C-514/19.

cjeu_case ·
32709

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 October 2020.#Union des industries de la protection des plantes v Premier ministre and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d'État (France).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 – Placing of plant protection products on the market – Emergency measures – Officially informing the European Commission – Directive (EU) 2015/1535 – Procedure for the provision of information in the field of technical regulations – Neonicotinoids – Protection of bees – Principle of sincere cooperation.#Case C-514/19.

cjeu_case ·
32710

Arrêt de la Cour (première chambre) du 8 octobre 2020.#Allmänna ombudet hos Tullverket contre Combinova AB.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Code des douanes de l’Union – Article 124, paragraphe 1, sous k) – Extinction de la dette douanière en cas de non-utilisation des marchandises – Notion de “marchandise utilisée” – Régime du perfectionnement actif – Dette douanière survenue en raison de l’inobservation de règles prévues dans le cadre du régime du perfectionnement actif – Absence de présentation du décompte d’apurement dans le délai prescrit.#Affaire C-476/19.

cjeu_case ·
32711

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 October 2020.#Allmänna ombudet hos Tullverket v Combinova AB.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Union Customs Code – Article 124(1)(k) – Extinction of the customs debt in the event the goods are not used – Concept of ‘goods that have been used’ – Inward processing procedure – Customs debt incurred through non-compliance with requirements provided for under the inward processing procedure – Bill of discharge not submitted within the prescribed time limit.#Case C-476/19.

cjeu_case ·
32712

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 8 October 2020.#Aktiebolaget Östgötatrafiken v Patent-och registreringsverket.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Trade marks – Directive 2008/95/EC – Article 3(1)(b) – Signs of which a trade mark may consist – Distinctive character – Application for registration as a trade mark of a sign in respect of a service, consisting of motifs of colour and intended to be affixed to goods used to provide that service – Assessment of the distinctive character of that sign – Criteria.#Case C-456/19.

cjeu_case ·
32713

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 8 October 2020.#Aktiebolaget Östgötatrafiken v Patent-och registreringsverket.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Svea Hovrätt, Patent- och marknadsöverdomstolen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Trade marks – Directive 2008/95/EC – Article 3(1)(b) – Signs of which a trade mark may consist – Distinctive character – Application for registration as a trade mark of a sign in respect of a service, consisting of motifs of colour and intended to be affixed to goods used to provide that service – Assessment of the distinctive character of that sign – Criteria.#Case C-456/19.

cjeu_case ·
32714

Arrêt de la Cour (cinquième chambre) du 8 octobre 2020.#Crown Van Gelder BV contre Autoriteit Consument en Markt (ACM).#Renvoi préjudiciel – Marché intérieur de l’électricité – Directive 2009/72/CE – Article 37 – Missions et compétences de l’autorité de régulation – Règlement extrajudiciaire des litiges – Notion de “partie ayant un grief à faire valoir” – Plainte introduite par un client final contre le gestionnaire d’un réseau de transport auquel l’installation de ce client n’est pas directement raccordée – Panne survenue sur ce réseau – Absence de relation contractuelle entre ledit client et le gestionnaire dudit réseau – Recevabilité de la plainte.#Affaire C-360/19.

cjeu_case ·
32715

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 8 October 2020.#Crown Van Gelder BV v Autoriteit Consument en Markt.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the College van Beroep voor het bedrijfsleven.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Internal market for electricity – Directive 2009/72/EC – Article 37 – Duties and powers of the regulatory authority – Out-of-court dispute settlement – Concept of ‘party having a complaint’ – Complaint submitted by a final customer against the operator of a transmission system to which that customer’s installation is not directly connected – Failure on the grid – No contractual relationship between that customer and the operator of that grid – Admissibility of the complaint.#Case C-360/19.

cjeu_case ·
32716

Arrêt de la Cour (septième chambre) du 8 octobre 2020.#Staatssecretaris van Financiën contre Exter BV.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Union douanière – Règlement (CEE) no 2913/92 – Code des douanes communautaire – Article 121, paragraphe 1 – Régime du perfectionnement actif – Mise en libre pratique – Naissance d’une dette douanière – Détermination de la dette – Notion d’“éléments de taxation” – Prise en compte d’une mesure tarifaire préférentielle.#Affaire C-330/19.

cjeu_case ·
32717

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 8 October 2020.#Staatssecretaris van Financiën v Exter BV.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Customs union — Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 — Community Customs Code — Article 121(1) — Inward processing procedure — Release for free circulation — Incurrence of a customs debt — Determination of the debt — Concept of ‘taxation elements’ — Taking account of a preferential tariff measure.#Case C-330/19.

cjeu_case ·
32718

Arrêt de la Cour (première chambre) du 8 octobre 2020.#United Biscuits (Pensions Trustees) Limited et United Biscuits Pension Investments Limited contre Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Taxe sur la valeur ajoutée (TVA) – Directive 2006/112/CE – Article 135, paragraphe 1, sous a) – Exonération des opérations d’assurance – Fourniture de services de gestion des fonds de pension au fiduciaire par les gestionnaires de placements – Exclusion de toute indemnisation de risque – Régime professionnel de pension – Pratique fiscale nationale – Exercice d’une activité d’assurance – Entités disposant d’un agrément – Entités ne disposant pas d’un tel agrément – Notion d’“opérations d’assurance”.#Affaire C-235/19.

cjeu_case ·
32719

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 October 2020.#United Biscuits (Pensions Trustees) Limited and United Biscuits Pension Investments Limited v Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 135(1)(a) – Exemption of insurance transactions – Supply of pension fund management services to trustees by investment fund managers – Exclusion of any risk indemnity – Occupational pension scheme – National tax practice – Exercise of an insurance activity – Authorised entities – Entities not holding such authorisation – Concept of ‘insurance transactions’.#Case C-235/19.

cjeu_case ·
32720

Opinion of Advocate General Hogan delivered on 8 October 2020.#Pometon SpA v European Commission.#Appeal – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – European steel abrasives market – Participation in bilateral and multilateral contacts with the aim of coordinating prices throughout the European Economic Area (EEA) – ‘Hybrid’ procedure having led successively to the adoption of a settlement decision and a decision made under the ordinary procedure – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 41 – Principle of impartiality of the European Commission – Article 48 – Presumption of innocence – Obligation to state reasons – Single and continuous infringement – Duration of the infringement – Equal treatment – Unlimited jurisdiction.#Case C-440/19 P.

cjeu_case ·