Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 315 documents
32602

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 15 October 2020.#Maria Teresa Coppo Gavazzi and Others v European Parliament.#Institutional law – Single statute for Members of the European Parliament – Members of the European Parliament elected in Italian constituencies – Adoption by the Ufficio di Presidenza della Camera dei deputati (Office of the President of the Chamber of Deputies, Italy) of Decision No 14/2018 on pensions ‐ Alteration in the amounts of the pensions of Italian national Members of Parliament – Corresponding alteration, by the European Parliament, in the amounts of the pensions of certain former Members of the European Parliament elected in Italy – Competence of the authority which adopted the measure – Obligation to state reasons – Acquired rights – Legal certainty – Legitimate expectations – Right to property – Proportionality – Equality of treatment.#Joined Cases T-389/19 to T-394/19, T-397/19, T-398/19, T-403/19, T-404/19, T-406/19, T-407/19, T-409/19 to T-414/19, T-416/19 to T-418/19, T-420/19 to T-422/19, T-425/19 to T-427/19, T-429/19 to T-432/19, T-435/19, T-436/19, T-438/19 to T-442/19, T-444/19 to T-446/19, T-448/19, T-450/19 to T-454/19, T-463/19 and T-465/19.

cjeu_case ·
32603

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 15 October 2020.#Maria Teresa Coppo Gavazzi and Others v European Parliament.#Institutional law – Single statute for Members of the European Parliament – Members of the European Parliament elected in Italian constituencies – Adoption by the Ufficio di Presidenza della Camera dei deputati (Office of the President of the Chamber of Deputies, Italy) of Decision No 14/2018 on pensions ‐ Alteration in the amounts of the pensions of Italian national Members of Parliament – Corresponding alteration, by the European Parliament, in the amounts of the pensions of certain former Members of the European Parliament elected in Italy – Competence of the authority which adopted the measure – Obligation to state reasons – Acquired rights – Legal certainty – Legitimate expectations – Right to property – Proportionality – Equality of treatment.#Joined Cases T-389/19 to T-394/19, T-397/19, T-398/19, T-403/19, T-404/19, T-406/19, T-407/19, T-409/19 to T-414/19, T-416/19 to T-418/19, T-420/19 to T-422/19, T-425/19 to T-427/19, T-429/19 to T-432/19, T-435/19, T-436/19, T-438/19 to T-442/19, T-444/19 to T-446/19, T-448/19, T-450/19 to T-454/19, T-463/19 and T-465/19.

cjeu_case ·
32606

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 15 October 2020.#Marina Karpeta-Kovalyova v European Commission.#Civil service – Members of the contract staff – Remuneration – Decision refusing entitlement to the expatriation allowance, the daily subsistence allowance, the installation allowance and to reimbursement of removal expenses and travel costs on taking up duties – Article 4(1)(a) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations – Diplomatic status – Five-year reference period – Concept of ‘habitual residence’.#Case T-249/19.

cjeu_case ·
32607

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 15 October 2020.#Marina Karpeta-Kovalyova v European Commission.#Civil service – Members of the contract staff – Remuneration – Decision refusing entitlement to the expatriation allowance, the daily subsistence allowance, the installation allowance and to reimbursement of removal expenses and travel costs on taking up duties – Article 4(1)(a) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations – Diplomatic status – Five-year reference period – Concept of ‘habitual residence’.#Case T-249/19.

cjeu_case ·
32611

Case T-818/19: Judgment of the General Court of 15 October 2020 — Dvectis CZ v EUIPO — Yado (Support pillow) (Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Registered community design representing a support pillow — Earlier Community design — Ground for invalidity — No individual character — Informed user — Degree of freedom of the designer — No different overall impression — Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 — Obligation to state reasons)

cjeu_case ·
32614

Joined Cases T-389/19 to T-394/19, T-397/19, T-398/19, T-403/19, T-404/19, T-406/19, T-407/19, T-409/19 to T-414/19, T-416/19 to T-418/19, T-420/19 to T-422/19, T-425/19 to T-427/19, T-429/19 to T-432/19, T-435/19, T-436/19, T-438/19 to T-442/19, T-444/19 to T-446/19, T-448/19, T-450/19 to T-454/19, T-463/19 and T-465/19: Judgment of the General Court of 15 October 2020 — Coppo Gavazzi and Others v Parliament (Institutional law — Single statute for Members of the European Parliament — Members of the European Parliament elected in Italian constituencies — Adoption by the Ufficio di Presidenza della Camera dei deputati (Office of the President of the Italian Chamber of Deputies, Italy) of Decision No 14/2018, on pensions — Change in the amount of the pensions of members of the Italian national parliament — Consequential change by the European Parliament in the amount of the pensions of certain former Members of the European Parliament elected in Italy — Competence of the authority which adopted the measure — Obligation to state reasons — Acquired rights — Legal certainty — Legitimate expectations — Right to property — Proportionality — Equal treatment)

cjeu_case ·
32616

Case T-249/19: Judgment of the General Court of 15 October 2020 –Karpeta-Kovalyova v Commission (Civil service — Members of the contract staff — Remuneration — Decision refusing entitlement to the expatriation allowance, the daily subsistence allowance, the installation allowance and to reimbursement of removal expenses and travel costs on taking up duties — Article 4(1)(a) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations — Diplomatic status — Five-year reference period — Concept of ‘habitual residence’)

cjeu_case ·
32618

Arrêt de la Cour (quatrième chambre) du 15 octobre 2020.#Jebsen & Jessen (GmbH & Co.) KG contre Hauptzollamt Hamburg.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Union douanière ‑ Règlement (CEE) noº2913/92 – Article 78 – Article 236, paragraphe 1 – Procédure d’importation – Révision de la déclaration en douane – Politique commerciale ‑ Antidumping – Règlement d’exécution (UE) 2015/82 – Droit antidumping définitif – Engagements de prix – Exonération – Article 2, paragraphe 1 – Condition de présentation d’une facture conforme – Défaut de mention d’un élément énuméré à l’annexe du règlement d’exécution 2015/82.#Affaire C-543/19.

cjeu_case ·
32619

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 15 October 2020.#Jebsen & Jessen (GmbH & Co.) KG v Hauptzollamt Hamburg.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs union – Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 – Article 78 – Article 236(1) – Import procedure – Revision of the customs declaration – Commercial policy – Anti-dumping – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/82 – Definitive anti-dumping duty – Price undertakings – Exemption – Article 2(1) – Condition to submit an undertaking invoice – Failure to mention an element listed in the Annex to Implementing Regulation 2015/82.#Case C-543/19.

cjeu_case ·
32620

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 15 October 2020.#E. Sp. z o.o. Sp. k. v Minister Finansów.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 90 – Reduction of the VAT taxable amount – Total or partial non-payment of the price – Conditions imposed by national legislation for the exercise of the right to reduction – Condition that the debtor must not be the subject of insolvency or winding-up proceedings – Condition that the creditor and the debtor must be subject to VAT.#Case C-335/19.

cjeu_case ·