Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 315 documents
31561

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 17 December 2020.#TR v Generalstaatsanwaltschaft Hamburg.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hanseatisches Oberlandesgericht Hamburg.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Urgent preliminary ruling procedure – Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – European arrest warrant – Article 4a(1) – Surrender procedures between Member States – Conditions for execution – Grounds for optional non-execution – Exceptions – Mandatory execution – Sentence handed down in absentia – Absconding of the accused person – Directive (EU) 2016/343 – Articles 8 and 9 – Right to be present at the trial – Requirements in the event of a conviction in absentia – Verification upon surrender of the person sentenced.#Case C-416/20 PPU.

cjeu_case ·
31562

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 17 December 2020.#L and P.#References for a preliminary ruling – Urgent preliminary ruling procedure – Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters – European arrest warrant – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – Article 1(3) – Article 6(1) – Surrender procedures between Member States – Conditions for execution – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Second paragraph of Article 47 – Right of access to an independent and impartial tribunal – Systemic or generalised deficiencies – Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ – Taking into consideration developments after the issue of the European arrest warrant concerned – Obligation on the executing judicial authority to verify specifically and precisely whether there are substantial grounds for believing that the person concerned will run a real risk of breach of his or her right to a fair trial in the event of surrender.#Case C-354/20 PPU and C-412/20 PPU.

cjeu_case ·
31563

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 17 December 2020.#L and P.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam.#References for a preliminary ruling – Urgent preliminary ruling procedure – Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters – European arrest warrant – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – Article 1(3) – Article 6(1) – Surrender procedures between Member States – Conditions for execution – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Second paragraph of Article 47 – Right of access to an independent and impartial tribunal – Systemic or generalised deficiencies – Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ – Taking into consideration developments after the issue of the European arrest warrant concerned – Obligation on the executing judicial authority to verify specifically and precisely whether there are substantial grounds for believing that the person concerned will run a real risk of breach of his or her right to a fair trial in the event of surrender.#Case C-354/20 PPU and C-412/20 PPU.

cjeu_case ·
31564

Case C-416/20 PPU: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 17 December 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Hanseatisches Oberlandesgericht Hamburg — Germany) — Execution of European arrest warrants issued in respect of TR (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant — Article 4a(1) — Surrender procedures between Member States — Conditions for execution — Grounds for optional non-execution — Exceptions — Mandatory execution — Sentence imposed in absentia — Escape of the person being prosecuted — Directive (EU) 2016/343 — Articles 8 and 9 — Right to be present at the trial — Requirements in the event of conviction in absentia — Verification on surrender of the convicted person)

cjeu_case ·
31565

Joined Cases C-354/20 PPU and C 412/20 PPU: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 17 December 2020 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam — Netherlands) — Execution of European arrest warrants issued in respect of L (C-354/20 PPU), P (C-412/20 PPU) (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 1(3) — Article 6(1) — Surrender procedures between Member States — Conditions for execution — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Second paragraph of Article 47 — Right of access to an independent and impartial tribunal — Systemic or generalised deficiencies — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — Taking into consideration of developments after the European arrest warrant concerned has been issued — Obligation of the executing judicial authority to determine specifically and precisely whether there are substantial grounds for believing that the person concerned will run a real risk of breach of his or her right to a fair trial if he or she is surrendered)

cjeu_case ·
31569

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 17 December 2020.#European Commission v Hellenic Republic.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Environment – Directive 92/43/EEC – Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora – Special areas of conservation – Article 4(4) – Obligation to establish conservation objectives – Article 6(1) – Obligation to take conservation measures – Decision 2006/613/EC – Mediterranean biogeographical region.#Case C-849/19.

cjeu_case ·
31570

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 17 December 2020.#European Commission v Hellenic Republic.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Environment – Directive 92/43/EEC – Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora – Special areas of conservation – Article 4(4) – Obligation to establish conservation objectives – Article 6(1) – Obligation to take conservation measures – Decision 2006/613/EC – Mediterranean biogeographical region.#Case C-849/19.

cjeu_case ·
31571

Arrêt de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 17 décembre 2020.#FRANCK d.d., Zagreb contre MMinistarstvo financija Republike Hrvatske, Samostalni sektor za drugostupanjski upravni postupak.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Taxe sur la valeur ajoutée (TVA) – Directive 2006/112/CE – Exonérations – Article 135, paragraphe 1, sous b) et d) – Notions d’“octroi de crédits” et d’“autres effets de commerce” – Opérations complexes – Prestation principale – Mise à disposition des fonds contre une rémunération – Transfert d’un billet à ordre à une société d’affacturage et de l’argent obtenu à l’émetteur du billet à ordre.#Affaire C-801/19.

cjeu_case ·
31572

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 17 December 2020.#FRANCK d.d., Zagreb v Ministarstvo financija Republike Hrvatske, Samostalni sektor za drugostupanjski upravni postupak.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Upravni sud u Zagrebu.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Exemptions – Article 135(1)(b) and (d) – Definitions of ‘granting of credit’ and ‘other negotiable instruments’ – Complex transactions – Principal supply – Provision of funds in return for payment – Transfer of a bill of exchange to a factoring company and the money obtained to the issuer of the bill of exchange.#Case C-801/19.

cjeu_case ·
31573

Arrêt de la Cour (première chambre) du 17 décembre 2020.#G. M. A. contre État belge.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Libre circulation des personnes – Article 45 TFUE – Citoyenneté de l’Union – Directive 2004/38/CE – Droit de séjour de plus de trois mois – Article 14, paragraphe 4, sous b) – Demandeurs d’emploi – Délai raisonnable pour prendre connaissance des offres d’emploi pouvant convenir au demandeur d’emploi et pour prendre les mesures lui permettant d’être embauché – Exigences imposées par l’État membre d’accueil au demandeur d’emploi pendant ce délai – Conditions du droit de séjour – Obligation de continuer à rechercher un emploi et d’avoir des chances réelles d’être engagé.#Affaire C-710/19.

cjeu_case ·
31574

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 17 December 2020.#G. M. A. v État belge.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d'État.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Freedom of movement for persons – Article 45 TFEU – Citizenship of the Union – Directive 2004/38/EC – Right of residence for more than three months – Article 14(4)(b) – Jobseekers – Reasonable period of time to acquaint themselves with potentially suitable employment opportunities and take the necessary steps to obtain employment – Requirements imposed by the host Member State on the jobseeker during that period – Conditions governing the right of residence – Obligation to continue seeking employment and to have a genuine chance of being engaged.#Case C-710/19.

cjeu_case ·
31575

Arrêt de la Cour (troisième chambre) du 17 décembre 2020.#A.M. contre E.M.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Rapprochement des législations – Produits cosmétiques – Règlement (CE) no 1223/2009 – Article 19 – Information des consommateurs – Étiquetage – Indications devant figurer sur le récipient et l’emballage des produits – Étiquetage en langue étrangère – “Fonction du produit cosmétique” – Notion – Emballages de produits cosmétiques comportant un renvoi à un catalogue détaillé de produits rédigé dans la langue du consommateur.#Affaire C-667/19.

cjeu_case ·
31576

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 17 December 2020.#A.M. v E.M.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Cosmetic products – Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 – Article 19 – Consumer information – Labelling – Information that must appear on the product container and packaging – Labelling in a foreign language – ‘Function of the cosmetic product’ – Concept – Cosmetic product packaging which contains a reference to a detailed product catalogue drafted in the language of the consumer.#Case C-667/19.

cjeu_case ·
31577

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 17 December 2020.#BAKATI PLUS Kereskedelmi és Szolgáltató Kft. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Exemptions on exportation – Article 146(1)(b) – Goods dispatched or transported outside the European Union by a customer not established within the territory of the Member State concerned – Article 147 – ‘Goods to be carried in the personal luggage of travellers’ not established within the European Union – Concept – Goods which have actually left the territory of the European Union – Proof – Refusal of the exemption on exportation – Principles of fiscal neutrality and proportionality – Tax evasion.#Case C-656/19.

cjeu_case ·
31578

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 17 December 2020.#BAKATI PLUS Kereskedelmi és Szolgáltató Kft. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Szegedi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bírósá.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Exemptions on exportation – Article 146(1)(b) – Goods dispatched or transported outside the European Union by a customer not established within the territory of the Member State concerned – Article 147 – ‘Goods to be carried in the personal luggage of travellers’ not established within the European Union – Concept – Goods which have actually left the territory of the European Union – Proof – Refusal of the exemption on exportation – Principles of fiscal neutrality and proportionality – Tax evasion.#Case C-656/19.

cjeu_case ·
31579

Arrêt de la Cour (cinquième chambre) du 17 décembre 2020.#Husqvarna AB contre Lidl Digital International GmbH & Co. KG.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Marques de l’Union européenne – Règlement (CE) no 207/2009 – Article 51, paragraphe 1, sous a) – Article 55, paragraphe 1 – Déchéance des droits attachés à la marque de l’Union – Marque de l’Union n’ayant pas fait l’objet d’un usage sérieux pendant une période ininterrompue de cinq ans – Échéance du terme de la période de cinq ans – Date d’appréciation.#Affaire C-607/19.

cjeu_case ·
31580

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 17 December 2020.#Husqvarna AB v Lidl Digital International GmbH & Co. KG.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – EU trade marks – Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 – Article 51(1)(a) – Article 55(1) – Revocation of rights in an EU mark – EU mark which has not been put to genuine use within a continuous period of five years – Expiry of the period of five years – Date of assessment.#Case C-607/19.

cjeu_case ·