31241Ordonnance du Tribunal (sixième chambre) du 20 janvier 2021.#Oriol Junqueras i Vies contre Parlement européen.#Recours en annulation – Droit institutionnel – Membre du Parlement – Privilèges et immunités – Demande de prendre d’urgence une initiative pour confirmer l’immunité d’un député européen – Acte non susceptible de recours – Irrecevabilité.#Affaire T-734/19.cjeu_case · 20 janvier 2021
31242Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 20 January 2021.#Oriol Junqueras i Vies v European Parliament.#Case T-734/19.cjeu_case · 20 janvier 2021
31243Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 20 January 2021.#Marc Folschette and Others v European Commission.#Non-contractual liability – Investigation by OLAF – Information technology contract – Corruption – Trading in influence – Final report recommending the bringing of criminal proceedings – Final acquittal by a criminal court – Period of limitation – Sufficiently serious infringement of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals.#Case T-884/19.cjeu_case · 20 janvier 2021
31244Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 20 January 2021.#Marc Folschette and Others v European Commission.#Non-contractual liability – Investigation by OLAF – Information technology contract – Corruption – Trading in influence – Final report recommending the bringing of criminal proceedings – Final acquittal by a criminal court – Period of limitation – Sufficiently serious infringement of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals.#Case T-884/19.cjeu_case · 20 janvier 2021
31245Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 20 January 2021.#Apologistics GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark discount-ap*theke.de – Earlier EU word marks APODISCOUNTER and APO and earlier figurative marks apo-discounter.de, apo.co and apo.de – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-844/19.cjeu_case · 20 janvier 2021
31246Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 20 January 2021.#Apologistics GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark discount-ap*theke.de – Earlier EU word marks APODISCOUNTER and APO and earlier figurative marks apo-discounter.de, apo.co and apo.de – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-844/19.cjeu_case · 20 janvier 2021
31247Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 20 January 2021.#Palírna U Zeleného stromu a.s. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark BLEND 42 FIRST CZECH BLENDED VODKA – Earlier EU word mark and international figurative mark 42 BELOW – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Relevant public – Similarity of the goods and services – Similarity of the signs – Global assessment of the likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-831/19.cjeu_case · 20 janvier 2021
31248Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 20 January 2021.#Palírna U Zeleného stromu a.s. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark BLEND 42 FIRST CZECH BLENDED VODKA – Earlier EU word mark and international figurative mark 42 BELOW – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Relevant public – Similarity of the goods and services – Similarity of the signs – Global assessment of the likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-831/19.cjeu_case · 20 janvier 2021
31249Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 20 January 2021.#Palírna U Zeleného stromu a.s. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark BLEND 42 VODKA – Earlier EU word mark and international figurative mark 42 BELOW – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Relevant public – Similarity of the goods and services – Similarity of the signs – Global assessment of the likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-830/19.cjeu_case · 20 janvier 2021
31250Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 20 January 2021.#Palírna U Zeleného stromu a.s. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark BLEND 42 VODKA – Earlier EU word mark and international figurative mark 42 BELOW – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Relevant public – Similarity of the goods and services – Similarity of the signs – Global assessment of the likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-830/19.cjeu_case · 20 janvier 2021
31251Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 20 January 2021.#Palírna U Zeleného stromu a.s. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark BLEND 42 VODKA – Earlier EU word mark and international figurative mark 42 BELOW – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Relevant public – Similarity of the goods and services – Similarity of the signs – Global assessment of the likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-829/19.cjeu_case · 20 janvier 2021
31252Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 20 January 2021.#Palírna U Zeleného stromu a.s. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark BLEND 42 VODKA – Earlier EU word mark and international figurative mark 42 BELOW – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Relevant public – Similarity of the goods and services – Similarity of the signs – Global assessment of the likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-829/19.cjeu_case · 20 janvier 2021
31253Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 20 January 2021.#Enoport - Produção de Bebidas Lda v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark CABEÇA DE TOIRO – Earlier EU word mark SANGRE DE TORO – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-811/19.cjeu_case · 20 janvier 2021
31254Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 20 January 2021.#Enoport - Produção de Bebidas Lda v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark CABEÇA DE TOIRO – Earlier EU word mark SANGRE DE TORO – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-811/19.cjeu_case · 20 janvier 2021
31255Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 20 January 2021.#12seasons GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark BE EDGY BERLIN – Earlier national word mark EDJI – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-329/19.cjeu_case · 20 janvier 2021
31256Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 20 January 2021.#12seasons GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark BE EDGY BERLIN – Earlier national word mark EDJI – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-329/19.cjeu_case · 20 janvier 2021
31257Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 20 January 2021.#Stada Arzneimittel AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark OptiMar – Earlier national word mark Mar – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-261/19.cjeu_case · 20 janvier 2021
31258Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 20 January 2021.#Stada Arzneimittel AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark OptiMar – Earlier national word mark Mar – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-261/19.cjeu_case · 20 janvier 2021
31259Case T-734/19: Order of the General Court of 20 January 2021 — Junqueras i Vies v Parliament (Action for annulment — Institutional law — Member of Parliament — Privileges and immunities — Request for an urgent initiative to confirm the immunity of a Member of the European Parliament — Act not open to challenge — Inadmissibility)cjeu_case · 20 janvier 2021
31260Case T-884/19: Judgment of the General Court of 20 January 2021 — Marc Folschette and Others v Commission (Non-contractual liability — Investigation by OLAF — Information technology contract — Corruption — Trading in influence — Final report recommending the bringing of criminal proceedings — Final acquittal by a criminal court — Period of limitation — Sufficiently serious infringement of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals)cjeu_case · 20 janvier 2021