Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 315 documents
31101

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 28 January 2021.#Arkadiusz Kaminski v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-626/20 P.

cjeu_case ·
31102

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 28 January 2021.#Arkadiusz Kaminski v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-626/20 P.

cjeu_case ·
31105

Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 28 January 2021.#Sotsiaalministeerium v Riigi Tugiteenuste Keskus.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tallinna Ringkonnakohus.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public supply contracts – Directive 2004/18/EC – Articles 2 and 46 – Project financed by the Fund for European Aid to the Most Disadvantaged – Criteria for the selection of tenderers – Regulation (EC) No 852/2004 – Article 6 – Requirement of a registration certificate or approval issued by the national food safety authority of the State in which the contract is to be performed.#Case C-6/20.

cjeu_case ·
31107

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 28 January 2021.#Criminal proceedings against IR.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Directive 2012/13/EU – Articles 4 to 7 – Letters of Rights set out in Annexes I and II – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – Right to information in criminal proceedings – Letter of Rights on arrest – Right to be informed of the accusation – Right of access to the materials of the case – Person arrested on the basis of a European arrest warrant in the executing Member State.#Case C-649/19.

cjeu_case ·
31108

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 28 January 2021.#Criminal proceedings against IR.#Request for a preliminary ruling from Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Directive 2012/13/EU – Articles 4 to 7 – Letters of Rights set out in Annexes I and II – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – Right to information in criminal proceedings – Letter of Rights on arrest – Right to be informed of the accusation – Right of access to the materials of the case – Person arrested on the basis of a European arrest warrant in the executing Member State.#Case C-649/19.

cjeu_case ·
31109

Arrêt de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 28 janvier 2021.#Qualcomm Inc. et Qualcomm Europe Inc. contre Commission européenne.#Pourvoi – Concurrence – Abus de position dominante – Marché des chipsets de bande de base UMTS – Règlement (CE) no 1/2003 – Article 18, paragraphe 3 – Décision de demande de renseignements – Caractère nécessaire des renseignements demandés – Proportionnalité – Charge de la preuve – Auto-incrimination.#Affaire C-466/19 P.

cjeu_case ·
31111

Opinion of Advocate General Saugmandsgaard Øe delivered on 28 January 2021.#B. K. v Republika Slovenija (Ministrstvo za obrambo).#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Vrhovno sodišče Republike Slovenije.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of the safety and health of workers – Organisation of working time – Members of the armed forces – Applicability of EU law – Article 4(2) TEU – Directive 2003/88/EC – Scope – Article 1(3) – Directive 89/391/EEC – Article 2(2) – Military activities – Concept of ‘working time’ – Stand-by period – Dispute concerning the remuneration of a worker.#Case C-742/19.

cjeu_case ·
31112

Opinion of Advocate General Tanchev delivered on 28 January 2021.#X v College van burgemeester en wethouders van de gemeente Purmerend.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Inland transport of dangerous goods – Directive 2008/68/EC – Article 5(1) – Concept of ‘construction requirement’ – Prohibition on laying down more stringent construction requirements – Authority of a Member State requiring a service station to be supplied with liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) only from road tankers fitted with a particular heat-resistant lining not provided for by the European Agreement concerning the International Carriage of Dangerous Goods by Road (ADR) – Unlawfulness – Decision legally unchallengeable by a category of persons – Strictly limited possibility of obtaining the annulment of such a decision where there is clear conflict with EU law – Principle of legal certainty – Principle of effectiveness.#Case C-120/19.

cjeu_case ·
31113

Case C-649/19: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 28 January 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad — Bulgaria) — Criminal proceedings against IR (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Directive 2012/13/EU — Articles 4 to 7 — Letters of Rights set out in Annexes I and II — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Right to information in criminal proceedings — Letter of Rights on arrest — Right to be informed of the accusation — Right of access to the materials of the case — Person arrested on the basis of a European arrest warrant in the executing Member State)

cjeu_case ·