30521Case T-694/19: Judgment of the General Court of 10 March 2021 — FI v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Surviving spouse — Survivor’s pension — Articles 18, 19 and 20 of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations — Conditions for eligibility — Duration of the marriage — Plea of illegality — Equal treatment — Proportionality)cjeu_case · 10 mars 2021
30522Case T-693/19: Judgment of the General Court of 10 March 2021 — Kerry Luxembourg v EUIPO — Ornua (KERRYMAID) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark KERRYMAID — Earlier EU figurative mark Kerrygold — Relative ground for refusal — Geographical name — Dominant element — Peaceful coexistence — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Application of the law ratione temporis)cjeu_case · 10 mars 2021
30523Case T-134/19: Judgment of the General Court of 10 March 2021 — AM v EIB (Civil service — EIB staff — Remuneration — Admissibility — Time limit for submitting a request to initiate the conciliation procedure — Act adversely affecting an official — Geographical mobility allowance — Transfer to an external office — Refusal to grant the allowance — Action for annulment and for damages)cjeu_case · 10 mars 2021
30524Arrêt de la Cour (première chambre) du 10 mars 2021.#M.A. contre Konsul Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej w N.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Contrôles aux frontières, asile et immigration – Politique des visas – Convention d’application de l’accord de Schengen – Article 21, paragraphe 2 bis – Charte des droits fondamentaux – Article 47 – Droit à un recours effectif – Refus d’un visa de long séjour par le consul – Obligation pour un État membre de garantir un recours devant un tribunal contre une décision de refus d’un tel visa.#Affaire C-949/19.cjeu_case · 10 mars 2021
30525Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 10 March 2021.#M.A. v Konsul Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej w N.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Border controls, asylum and immigration – Visa policy – Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement – Article 21(2a) – Charter of Fundamental Rights – Article 47 – Right to an effective remedy – Refusal of a long-stay visa by the consul – Obligation on a Member State to guarantee a remedy before a tribunal against a decision refusing such a visa.#Case C-949/19.cjeu_case · 10 mars 2021
30526Arrêt de la Cour (neuvième chambre) du 10 mars 2021.#Samohýl group a.s. contre Generální ředitelství cel.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Tarif douanier commun – Classement tarifaire – Nomenclature combinée – Positions tarifaires 3004 et 3808 – Interprétation – Règlement (CE) no 455/2007 – Solution pour spot-on pour chats contre les infestations de puces et de tiques – Effets thérapeutiques ou prophylactiques.#Affaire C-941/19.cjeu_case · 10 mars 2021
30527Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 10 March 2021.#Samohýl group a.s. v Generální ředitelství cel.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Krajský soud v Ostravě.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common Customs Tariff – Tariff classification – Combined Nomenclature – Tariff headings 3004 and 3808 – Interpretation – Regulation (EC) No 455/2007 – Spot-on solution for cats against infestations of fleas and ticks – Therapeutic or prophylactic effects.#Case C-941/19.cjeu_case · 10 mars 2021
30528Arrêt de la Cour (première chambre) du 10 mars 2021.#VK contre An Bord Pleanála.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Libre prestation de services par les avocats – Directive 77/249/CEE – Article 5 – Obligation pour un avocat prestataire représentant un client dans le cadre d’une procédure juridictionnelle nationale d’agir de concert avec un avocat exerçant auprès de la juridiction saisie – Limites.#Affaire C-739/19.cjeu_case · 10 mars 2021
30529Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 10 March 2021.#VK v An Bord Pleanála.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court (Ireland).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Lawyers’ freedom to provide services – Directive 77/249/EEC – Article 5 – Obligation for a visiting lawyer representing a client in domestic legal proceedings to work in conjunction with a lawyer who practises before the judicial authority in question – Limits.#Case C-739/19.cjeu_case · 10 mars 2021
30530Arrêt de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 10 mars 2021.#Von Aschenbach & Voss GmbH contre Hauptzollamt Duisburg.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Droit antidumping définitif – Feuilles d’aluminium originaires de Chine – Feuilles d’aluminium légèrement modifiées – Règlement d’exécution (UE) 2017/271 – Recevabilité – Absence d’introduction d’un recours en annulation par la requérante au principale – Qualité pour agir en annulation.#Affaire C-708/19.cjeu_case · 10 mars 2021
30531Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 March 2021.#Von Aschenbach & Voss GmbH v Hauptzollamt Duisburg.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Düsseldorf.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Definitive anti-dumping duty – Aluminium foil originating in China – Slightly modified aluminium foil – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/271 – Admissibility – No action for annulment brought by the applicant in the main proceedings – Locus standi in an action for annulment.#Case C-708/19.cjeu_case · 10 mars 2021
30532Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 10 March 2021.#European Road Transport Telematics Implementation Coordination Organisation - Intelligent Transport Systems & Services Europe (Ertico - ITS Europe) v European Commission.#Appeal – State aid – Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities – Recommendation 2003/361/EC – Decision of the Validation Panel of the European Commission on classification as a micro, small or medium-sized enterprise (SME) – Decision 2012/838/EU, Euratom – Annex – Sections 1.2.6 and 1.2.7 – Request for review – Regulation (EC) No 58/2003 – Article 22 – No administrative proceedings – Link between request for review and administrative proceedings – Refusal of SME status despite formal observance of the Recommendation 2003/361 criteria – Legal certainty – Legitimate expectations – Handicaps usually faced by SMEs – None.#Case C-572/19 P.cjeu_case · 10 mars 2021
30533Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 10 March 2021.#European Road Transport Telematics Implementation Coordination Organisation - Intelligent Transport Systems & Services Europe (Ertico - ITS Europe) v European Commission.#Appeal – State aid – Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities – Recommendation 2003/361/EC – Decision of the Validation Panel of the European Commission on classification as a micro, small or medium-sized enterprise (SME) – Decision 2012/838/EU, Euratom – Annex – Sections 1.2.6 and 1.2.7 – Request for review – Regulation (EC) No 58/2003 – Article 22 – No administrative proceedings – Link between request for review and administrative proceedings – Refusal of SME status despite formal observance of the Recommendation 2003/361 criteria – Legal certainty – Legitimate expectations – Handicaps usually faced by SMEs – None.#Case C-572/19 P.cjeu_case · 10 mars 2021
30534Arrêt de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 10 mars 2021.#FD contre Staatliches Amt für Landwirtschaft und Umwelt Mittleres Mecklenburg.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Politique agricole commune – Paiements directs – Règlement (UE) no 1307/2013 – Article 24 – Jeune agriculteur ayant bénéficié d’une première attribution de droits au paiement – Article 30, paragraphe 6 – Règlement délégué (UE) no 639/2014 – Article 28, paragraphe 2 – Attribution supplémentaire de droits au paiement issus de la réserve nationale.#Affaire C-365/19.cjeu_case · 10 mars 2021
30535Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 10 March 2021.#FD v Staatliches Amt für Landwirtschaft und Umwelt Mittleres Mecklenburg.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Schwerin.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common agricultural policy – Direct payments – Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 – Article 24 – Young farmer having received an initial allocation of payment entitlements – Article 30(6) – Delegated Regulation (EU) No 639/2014 – Article 28(2) – Further allocation of payment entitlements from the national reserve.#Case C-365/19.cjeu_case · 10 mars 2021
30536Case C-949/19: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 10 March 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny — Poland) — M.A. v Konsul Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej w N. (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Border controls, asylum and immigration — Visa policy — Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement — Article 21(2a) — Charter of Fundamental Rights — Article 47 — Right to an effective remedy — Refusal of a long-stay visa by the consul — Obligation on a Member State to guarantee a remedy before a tribunal against a decision refusing such a visa)cjeu_case · 10 mars 2021
30537Case C-941/19: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 10 March 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Krajský soud v Ostravě — Czech Republic) — Samohýl group a.s. v Generální ředitelství cel (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common Customs Tariff — Tariff classification — Combined Nomenclature — Tariff headings 3004 and 3808 — Interpretation — Regulation (EC) No 455/2007 — Spot-on solution for cats against infestations of fleas and ticks — Therapeutic or prophylactic effects)cjeu_case · 10 mars 2021
30538Case C-739/19: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 10 March 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court — Ireland) — VK v An Bord Pleanála (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Lawyers’ freedom to provide services — Directive 77/249/EEC — Article 5 — Obligation for a visiting lawyer representing a client in domestic legal proceedings to work in conjunction with a lawyer who practises before the judicial authority in question — Limits)cjeu_case · 10 mars 2021
30539Case C-708/19: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 March 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Düsseldorf — Germany) — Von Aschenbach & Voss GmbH v Hauptzollamt Duisburg (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Definitive anti-dumping duty — Aluminium foil originating in China — Slightly modified aluminium foil — Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/271 — Admissibility — No action for annulment brought by the applicant in the main proceedings — Locus standi in an action for annulment)cjeu_case · 10 mars 2021
30540Case C-572/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 10 March 2021 — European Road Transport Telematics Implementation Coordination Organisation — Intelligent Transport Systems & Services Europe (Ertico — ITS Europe) v European Commission (Appeal — State aid — Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities — Recommendation 2003/361/EC — Decision of the Validation Panel of the European Commission on classification as a micro, small or medium-sized enterprise (SME) — Decision 2012/838/EU, Euratom — Annex — Sections 1.2.6 and 1.2.7 — Request for review — Regulation (EC) No 58/2003 — Article 22 — No administrative proceedings — Link between request for review and administrative proceedings — Refusal of SME status despite formal observance of the Recommendation 2003/361 criteria — Legal certainty — Legitimate expectations — Handicaps usually faced by SMEs — None)cjeu_case · 10 mars 2021