29581Case T-789/19: Judgment of the General Court of 12 May 2021 — Moerenhout and Others v Commission (Law governing the institutions — European citizens’ initiative — Trade with territories under military occupation — Refusal of registration — Manifest lack of powers of the Commission — Article 4(2)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 211/2011 — Common commercial policy — Article 207 TFEU — Common foreign and security policy — Article 215 TFEU — Obligation to state reasons — Article 4(3) of Regulation No 211/2011)cjeu_case · 12 mai 2021
29582Case T-638/19: Judgment of the General Court of 12 May 2021 — Sun Stars & Sons v EUIPO — Valvis Holding (AC AQUA AC) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the three-dimensional EU trade mark AC AQUA AC — Earlier three-dimensional EU and national trade marks VODAVODA — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))cjeu_case · 12 mai 2021
29583Case T-637/19: Judgment of the General Court of 12 May 2021 — Sun Stars & Sons v EUIPO — Carpathian Springs (AQUA CARPATICA) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the three-dimensional EU trade mark AQUA CARPATICA — Earlier three-dimensional EU and national trade marks VODAVODA — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))cjeu_case · 12 mai 2021
29584Case T-387/19: Judgment of the General Court of 12 May 2021 — DF and DG v EIB (Civil service — Staff of the EIB — Remuneration — Decision refusing entitlement to an installation allowance upon return to headquarters — Liability)cjeu_case · 12 mai 2021
29585Rectification order of 12 May 2021.#TKF v Department of Justice for Northern Ireland.#Rectification of judgment.#Case C-729/19.cjeu_case · 12 mai 2021
29586Rectification order of 12 May 2021.#KS and Others v The International Protection Appeals Tribunal and Others.#Rectification of judgment.#Joined Cases C-322/19 and C-385/19.cjeu_case · 12 mai 2021
29587Arrêt de la Cour (deuxième chambre) du 12 mai 2021.#CS et Finanzamt Österreich, Dienststelle Graz-Stadt contre Finanzamt Österreich, Dienststelle Judenburg Liezen et technoRent International GmbH.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Système commun de taxe sur la valeur ajoutée (TVA) – Directive 2006/112/CE – Article 90 – Réduction de la base d’imposition – Article 183 – Remboursement de l’excédent de TVA – Intérêts de retard – Absence de réglementation nationale – Principe de neutralité fiscale – Applicabilité directe des dispositions du droit de l’Union – Principe d’interprétation conforme.#Affaire C-844/19.cjeu_case · 12 mai 2021
29588Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 12 May 2021.#CS and Finanzamt Österreich, Dienststelle Graz-Stadt v Finanzamt Österreich, Dienststelle Judenburg Liezen and technoRent International GmbH.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 90 – Reduction of the taxable amount – Article 183 – Refund of excess VAT – Default interest – No national rule – Principle of fiscal neutrality – Direct effect of provisions of EU law – Principle that national law must be interpreted in conformity with EU law.#Case C-844/19.cjeu_case · 12 mai 2021
29589Arrêt de la Cour (première chambre) du 12 mai 2021.#Vereniging van Effectenbezitters contre BP plc.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Compétence judiciaire et exécution des décisions en matière civile et commerciale – Règlement (UE) no 1215/2012 – Article 7, point 2 – Compétence en matière délictuelle ou quasi délictuelle – Lieu de matérialisation du dommage – Dommage consistant exclusivement en une perte financière.#Affaire C-709/19.cjeu_case · 12 mai 2021
29590Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 May 2021.#Vereniging van Effectenbezitters v BP plc.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Jurisdiction and the enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters – Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 – Article 7(2) – Jurisdiction in tort, delict or quasi-delict – Place where the harmful event occurred – Damage consisting in purely financial loss.#Case C-709/19.cjeu_case · 12 mai 2021
29591Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 12 May 2021.#WS v Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement – Article 54 – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 50 – Ne bis in idem principle – Article 21 TFEU – Freedom of movement of persons – Interpol red notice – Directive (EU) 2016/680 – Lawfulness of the processing of personal data contained in such a notice.#Case C-505/19.cjeu_case · 12 mai 2021
29592Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 12 May 2021.#WS v Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Wiesbaden.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement – Article 54 – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 50 – Ne bis in idem principle – Article 21 TFEU – Freedom of movement of persons – Interpol red notice – Directive (EU) 2016/680 – Lawfulness of the processing of personal data contained in such a notice.#Case C-505/19.cjeu_case · 12 mai 2021
29593Case C-844/19: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 12 May 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof — Austria) — CS, Finanzamt Österreich, Dienststelle Graz-Stadt, formerly Finanzamt Graz-Stadt v Finanzamt Österreich, Dienststelle Judenburg Liezen, formerly Finanzamt Judenburg Liezen, technoRent International GmbH (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common system of value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Article 90 — Reduction of the taxable amount — Article 183 — Refund of excess VAT — Default interest — No national rule — Principle of fiscal neutrality — Direct effect of provisions of EU law — Principle that national law must be interpreted in conformity with EU law)cjeu_case · 12 mai 2021
29594Case C-709/19: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 May 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden — Netherlands) — Vereniging van Effectenbezitters v BP plc (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Jurisdiction and the enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters — Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 — Article 7(2) — Jurisdiction in tort, delict or quasi-delict — Place where the harmful event occurred — Damage consisting in purely financial loss)cjeu_case · 12 mai 2021
29595Case C-505/19: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 12 May 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Wiesbaden — Germany) — WS v Bundesrepublik Deutschland (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement — Article 54 — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 50 — Ne bis in idem principle — Article 21 TFEU — Freedom of movement of persons — Interpol red notice — Directive (EU) 2016/680 — Lawfulness of the processing of personal data contained in such a notice)cjeu_case · 12 mai 2021
29596Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 12 May 2021.#Grand Duchy of Luxembourg and Others v European Commission.#State aid – Aid implemented by Luxembourg in favour of Engie – Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market and unlawful and ordering its recovery – Tax rulings – State resources – Advantage – Combined effect of two tax measures – Participation exemption regime – Taxation of profit distributions – Abuse of law – Selectivity – Reference Framework – Finding of a derogation – Comparability of situations – Parent-subsidy arrangement – Group of companies – Recovery – Indirect harmonisation – Procedural rights – Obligation to state reasons.#Cases T-516/18 and T-525/18.cjeu_case · 12 mai 2021
29597Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 12 May 2021.#Grand Duchy of Luxembourg and Others v European Commission.#State aid – Aid implemented by Luxembourg in favour of Engie – Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market and unlawful and ordering its recovery – Tax rulings – State resources – Advantage – Combined effect of two tax measures – Participation exemption regime – Taxation of profit distributions – Abuse of law – Selectivity – Reference Framework – Finding of a derogation – Comparability of situations – Parent-subsidy arrangement – Group of companies – Recovery – Indirect harmonisation – Procedural rights – Obligation to state reasons.#Cases T-516/18 and T-525/18.cjeu_case · 12 mai 2021
29598Case T-199/18: Order of the General Court of 12 May 2021 — SCF Terminal (Cyprus) and SHB v Council and Otherscjeu_case · 12 mai 2021
29599Case T-198/18: Order of the General Court of 12 May 2021 — Chrysses Demetriades & Co. and Provident Fund of the Employees of Chrysses Demetriades & Co. v Council and Otherscjeu_case · 12 mai 2021
29600Case T-197/18: Order of the General Court of 12 May 2021 — JV Voscf and Others v Council and Otherscjeu_case · 12 mai 2021