Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 315 documents
28001

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 2 September 2021.#European Commission v Federal Republic of Germany.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Internal markets for electricity and natural gas – Directive 2009/72/EC – Article 2(21) – Article 19(3), (5) and (8) – Article 37(1)(a) and (6)(a) and (b) – Directive 2009/73/EC – Article 2(20) – Article 19(3), (5) and (8) – Article 41(1)(a) and (6)(a) and (b) – Concept of a ‘vertically integrated undertaking’ – Effective unbundling of networks from the activities of production and supply of electricity and natural gas – Independent transmission operator – Independence of the staff and the management of the transmission system operator – Transitional periods – Shares held in the capital of the vertically integrated undertaking – National regulatory authorities – Independence – Exclusive powers – Article 45 TFEU – Freedom of movement for workers – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 15 – Right to engage in work and to pursue an occupation – Article 17 – Right to property – Article 52(1) – Restrictions – Principle of democracy.#Case C-718/18.

cjeu_case ·
28002

Case C-718/18: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 2 September 2021 — European Commission v Federal Republic of Germany (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Internal markets for electricity and natural gas — Directive 2009/72/EC — Article 2(21) — Article 19(3), (5) and (8) — Article 37(1)(a) and (6)(a) and (b) — Directive 2009/73/EC — Article 2(20) — Article 19(3), (5) and (8) — Article 41(1)(a) and (6)(a) and (b) — Concept of a ‘vertically integrated undertaking’ — Effective unbundling of networks from the activities of production and supply of electricity and natural gas — Independent transmission operator — Independence of the staff and the management of the transmission system operator — Transitional periods — Shares held in the capital of the vertically integrated undertaking — National regulatory authorities — Independence — Exclusive powers — Article 45 TFEU — Freedom of movement for workers — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 15 — Right to engage in work and to pursue an occupation — Article 17 — Right to property — Article 52(1) — Restrictions — Principle of democracy)

cjeu_case ·
28009

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 1 September 2021.#sprd.net AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-236/21 P.

cjeu_case ·
28010

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 1 September 2021.#sprd.net AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-236/21 P.

cjeu_case ·
28011

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 1 September 2021.#Likvidacijska masa iza Mesoprodukt d.o.o. and Gojko Čuljak v European Commission.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Action for annulment and for damages – Complaint lodged with the European Commission seeking a declaration that EU law has been infringed by the Republic of Croatia – Alleged non-compliance of national law with Directive 68/151/EEC – Failure to initiate infringement proceedings – Application for legal aid – Appeal manifestly unfounded.#Case C-171/21 P.

cjeu_case ·
28012

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 1 September 2021.#Likvidacijska masa iza Mesoprodukt d.o.o. and Gojko Čuljak v European Commission.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Action for annulment and for damages – Complaint lodged with the European Commission seeking a declaration that EU law has been infringed by the Republic of Croatia – Alleged non-compliance of national law with Directive 68/151/EEC – Failure to initiate infringement proceedings – Application for legal aid – Appeal manifestly unfounded.#Case C-171/21 P.

cjeu_case ·
28013

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 1 September 2021.#Criminal proceedings against KI.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Ne bis in idem principle – Duplication of penalties – Nature of a penalty imposed by the police – Implementation of national law – No connection to EU law – Clear lack of jurisdiction of the Court.#Case C-131/21.

cjeu_case ·
28014

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 1 September 2021.#Criminal proceedings against KI.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Budai Központi Kerületi Bíróság.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Ne bis in idem principle – Duplication of penalties – Nature of a penalty imposed by the police – Implementation of national law – No connection to EU law – Clear lack of jurisdiction of the Court.#Case C-131/21.

cjeu_case ·
28015

Case C-131/21: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 1 September 2021 — (request for a preliminary ruling from the Budai Központi Kerületi Bíróság — Hungary) — criminal proceedings against KI (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Ne bis in idem principal — Cumulation of penalties — Nature of a police sanction — Implementation of national law — Lack of connection to EU law — Clear lack of jurisdiction of the Court)

cjeu_case ·
28016

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 1 September 2021.#Bimbo Donuts Iberia, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark DONAS DULCESOL – Earlier national word mark DONAS – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Lack of proof of genuine use of earlier mark – Classification of the goods in respect of which genuine use has been shown – Article 47(2) and (3) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-697/20.

cjeu_case ·
28017

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 1 September 2021.#Bimbo Donuts Iberia, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark DONAS DULCESOL – Earlier national word mark DONAS – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Lack of proof of genuine use of earlier mark – Classification of the goods in respect of which genuine use has been shown – Article 47(2) and (3) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-697/20.

cjeu_case ·
28018

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 1 September 2021.#Residencial Palladium, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark PALLADIUM HOTEL GARDEN BEACH – Earlier national trade name GRAND HOTEL PALLADIUM – Relative ground for refusal – Use in the course of trade of a sign of more than mere local significance – Article 8(4) and Article 53(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(4) and Article 60(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-566/20.

cjeu_case ·
28019

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 1 September 2021.#Residencial Palladium, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark PALLADIUM HOTEL GARDEN BEACH – Earlier national trade name GRAND HOTEL PALLADIUM – Relative ground for refusal – Use in the course of trade of a sign of more than mere local significance – Article 8(4) and Article 53(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(4) and Article 60(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-566/20.

cjeu_case ·