Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 315 documents
27783

Case C-906/19: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 9 September 2021 (Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation — France) — Criminal proceedings against FO (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Road transport — Harmonisation of certain provisions of social legislation — Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 — Article 3(a) — Non-application of the regulation to carriage by road by vehicles used for the carriage of passengers on regular services where the route covered by the service in question does not exceed 50 km — Vehicle for mixed-use — Article 19(2) — Extraterritorial penalty — Infringement detected on the territory of a Member State committed on the territory of another Member State — Principle that offences and penalties must have a proper legal basis — Regulation (EEC) No 3821/85 — Recording equipment in road transport — Article 15(2) — Obligation to insert the driver card — Article 15(7) — Obligation to produce the driver card whenever an inspecting officer so requests — Failure to insert the driver card in the recording equipment on several of the 28 days preceeding the inspection day)

cjeu_case ·
27784

Case C-855/19: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 9 September 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny — Poland) — G. Sp. z o.o. v Dyrektor Izby Administracji Skarbowej w Bydgoszczy (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Article 69 — Chargeability of VAT — Intra-Community acquisition of motor fuels — Obligation to make early payment of VAT — Article 206 — Concept of ‘interim payments’ — Article 273 — Correct collection of VAT and prevention of evasion — Discretion of the Member States)

cjeu_case ·
27785

Case C-783/19: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 9 September 2021 (Request for a preliminary ruling from the Audiencia Provincial de Barcelona — Spain) — Comité Interprofessionnel du Vin de Champagne v GB (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Agriculture — Protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs — Uniform and exhaustive nature — Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 — Article 103(2)(a)(ii) — Article 103(2)(b) — Evocation — Protected Designation of Origin (PDO) ‘Champagne’ — Services — Comparability of products — Use of the trade name ‘Champanillo’)

cjeu_case ·
27786

Case C-768/19: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 9 September 2021 (Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht — Germany) — Federal Republic of Germany v SE (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common policy on asylum and subsidiary protection — Directive 2011/95/EU — Third indent of Article 2(j) — Definition of ‘family member’ — Adult applying for international protection because of that adult’s family relationship with a minor who has already obtained subsidiary protection — Relevant date for assessing ‘minor’ status)

cjeu_case ·
27787

Case C-107/19: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 9 September 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Obvodní soud pro Prahu 9 — Czech Republic — XR v Dopravní podnik hl. m. Prahy, akciová společnost (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2003/88/EC — Organisation of working time — Concepts of ‘working time’ and ‘rest period’ — Break during which the employee must remain ready to respond to a call-out within a two-minute time limit — Primacy of EU law)

cjeu_case ·
27788

Arrêt de la Cour (quatrième chambre) du 9 septembre 2021.#Adler Real Estate AG e.a. contre Finanzmarktaufsichtsbehörde (FMA).#Renvoi préjudiciel – Valeurs mobilières admises à la négociation sur un marché réglementé établi ou opérant dans un État membre – Obligation de transparence – Notification des “participations importantes” acquises dans le capital de sociétés par des “personnes agissant de concert” – Directive 2004/109/CE – Article 3, paragraphe 1 bis, quatrième alinéa – Notion d’“exigences plus strictes” – Directive 2004/25/CE – “Surveillance” par une autorité désignée conformément à l’article 4 de cette directive.#Affaire C-605/18.

cjeu_case ·
27789

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 9 September 2021.#Adler Real Estate AG and Others v Finanzmarktaufsichtsbehörde (FMA).#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Securities admitted to trading on a regulated market situated or operating within a Member State – Obligation of transparency – Notification of ‘major holdings’ in companies acquired by ‘persons acting in concert’ – Directive 2004/109/EC – Fourth subparagraph of Article 3(1a) – Concept of ‘more stringent’ requirements – Directive 2004/25/EC – ‘Supervision’ by an authority designated pursuant to Article 4 of that directive.#Case C-605/18.

cjeu_case ·
27790

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 9 September 2021.#FN and Others v Übernahmekommission.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Company law – Takeover bids – Directive 2004/25/EC – Article 5 – Mandatory bid – Article 4 – Supervisory authority – Final decision making a finding of infringement of the obligation to make a takeover bid – Binding effect of that decision in subsequent proceedings for an administrative sanction initiated by the same authority – EU law principle of effectiveness – General principles of EU law – Rights of the defence – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Articles 47 and 48 – Right to silence – Presumption of innocence – Access to an independent and impartial tribunal.#Case C-546/18.

cjeu_case ·
27791

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 9 September 2021.#FN and Others v Übernahmekommission.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Company law – Takeover bids – Directive 2004/25/EC – Article 5 – Mandatory bid – Article 4 – Supervisory authority – Final decision making a finding of infringement of the obligation to make a takeover bid – Binding effect of that decision in subsequent proceedings for an administrative sanction initiated by the same authority – EU law principle of effectiveness – General principles of EU law – Rights of the defence – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Articles 47 and 48 – Right to silence – Presumption of innocence – Access to an independent and impartial tribunal.#Case C-546/18.

cjeu_case ·
27792

Case C-605/18: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 9 September 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht — Austria) — Adler Real Estate AG, Petrus Advisers LLP, GM v Finanzmarktaufsichtsbehörde (FMA) (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Securities admitted to trading on a regulated market situated or operating within a Member State — Transparency requirement — Notification of ‘major holdings’ acquired in companies by ‘persons acting in concert’ — Directive 2004/109/EC — Article 3(1a), fourth subparagraph — Concept of ‘more stringent requirements’ — Directive 2004/25/EC — ‘Supervision’ by an authority appointed pursuant to Article 4 of that directive)

cjeu_case ·
27793

Case C-546/18: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 9 September 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht — Austria) — FN, GM, Adler Real Estate AG, HL, Petrus Advisers LLP v Übernahmekommission (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Company law — Takeover bids — Directive 2004/25/EC — Article 5 — Mandatory bid — Article 4 — Supervisory authority — Definitive decision establishing an infringement of the obligation to submit a takeover bid — Binding effect of that decision in the context of subsequent administrative-penalty proceedings conducted by the same authority — Principle of the effectiveness of EU law — General principles of EU law — Rights of the defence — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Articles 47 and 48 — Right to silence — Presumption of innocence — Access to an independent and impartial tribunal)

cjeu_case ·
27800

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 8 September 2021.#repowermap.org v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-417/21 P.

cjeu_case ·