Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 314 documents
2681

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Crédit agricole SA and Others v European Central Bank.#Appeal – Economic and monetary policy – Prudential supervision of credit institutions – Single supervisory mechanism – Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 – Specific supervisory tasks conferred on the European Central Bank (ECB) – Article 4 – Setting of prudential requirements – Article 16 – Risk linked to irrevocable payment commitments (IPCs) given in favour of deposit guarantee schemes or resolution funds – Deduction in full from the Common Equity Tier 1 capital of the sums paid as collateral for the IPCs – Discretion of the ECB – Judicial review.#Case C-548/24 P.

cjeu_case ·
2683

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#E. sp.j. v C. sp. z o.o.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2011/7/EU – Combating late payment in commercial transactions – Article 3(1) and (3)(a) – Interest for late payment – Article 6(1) and (2) – Compensation for recovery costs – Conditions – National legislation providing for the set-off of reciprocal claims by declaration with retroactive effect – Simultaneous extinguishment of claims up to the amount of the lowest claim – Effects on interest and on compensation.#Case C-481/24.

cjeu_case ·
2684

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#E. sp.j. v C. sp. z o.o.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy dla m.st. Warszawy w Warszawie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2011/7/EU – Combating late payment in commercial transactions – Article 3(1) and (3)(a) – Interest for late payment – Article 6(1) and (2) – Compensation for recovery costs – Conditions – National legislation providing for the set-off of reciprocal claims by declaration with retroactive effect – Simultaneous extinguishment of claims up to the amount of the lowest claim – Effects on interest and on compensation.#Case C-481/24.

cjeu_case ·
2686

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Integritetsskyddsmyndigheten v AB Storstockholms Lokaltrafik.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Articles 13 and 14 – Scope – Personal data collected by means of body cameras worn by ticket inspectors on public transport – Legal basis for the obligation on the data controller to provide information to the data subject.#Case C-422/24.

cjeu_case ·
2687

Arrêt de la Cour (troisième chambre) du 18 décembre 2025.#Amazon EU Sàrl contre Ministre de la Culture et Ministre de l’Économie, des Finances et de la Souveraineté industrielle et numérique.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Marché intérieur – Libre prestation de services – Libre circulation des marchandises – Protection ou promotion de la diversité culturelle – Service de livraison à domicile de livres – Mesure nationale prévoyant une tarification minimale pour un tel service – Directive 2006/123/CE – Applicabilité – Articulation avec les articles 34 et 56 TFUE.#Affaire C-366/24.

cjeu_case ·
2688

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Amazon EU Sàrl v Ministre de la Culture and Ministre de l’Économie, des Finances et de la Souveraineté industrielle et numérique.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d'État (France).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Internal market – Freedom to provide services – Free movement of goods – Protection or promotion of cultural diversity – Home delivery of books service – National measure providing for a minimum charge in respect of such a service – Directive 2006/123/EC – Applicability – Relationship with Articles 34 and 56 TFEU.#Case C-366/24.

cjeu_case ·
2689

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#SIA „EUROPARK LATVIA” and SKIDATA GmbH v Valsts ieņēmumu dienests.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Industrial policy – Information procedure in the field of technical standards and regulations and of rules on Information Society services – Directive (EU) 2015/1535 – Concept of ‘technical regulation’ – National rule requiring the provision of the source code of software registered in the database of the tax authority to a body responsible for assessing the conformity of fiscal technical requirements – Article 34 TFEU – Measure having equivalent effect to a quantitative restriction on imports – Principle of proportionality.#Case C-353/24.

cjeu_case ·
2690

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#SIA „EUROPARK LATVIA” and SKIDATA GmbH v Valsts ieņēmumu dienests.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administratīvā rajona tiesa.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Industrial policy – Information procedure in the field of technical standards and regulations and of rules on Information Society services – Directive (EU) 2015/1535 – Concept of ‘technical regulation’ – National rule requiring the provision of the source code of software registered in the database of the tax authority to a body responsible for assessing the conformity of fiscal technical requirements – Article 34 TFEU – Measure having equivalent effect to a quantitative restriction on imports – Principle of proportionality.#Case C-353/24.

cjeu_case ·
2691

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Autorità per le Garanzie nelle Comunicazioni (AGCOM) v BRT SpA and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Postal parcel delivery services provided to the public – Directive 97/67/EC – Articles 22 and 22a – Regulation (EU) 2018/644 – Article 4 – Decision of the national regulatory authority imposing on parcel delivery service providers obligations to provide information – Legal basis for the competence of that authority to impose specific obligations to provide information on operators not carrying out cross-border parcel delivery – Proportionality.#Case C-345/24.

cjeu_case ·
2692

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Autorità per le Garanzie nelle Comunicazioni (AGCOM) v BRT SpA and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Postal parcel delivery services provided to the public – Directive 97/67/EC – Articles 22 and 22a – Regulation (EU) 2018/644 – Article 4 – Decision of the national regulatory authority imposing on parcel delivery service providers obligations to provide information – Legal basis for the competence of that authority to impose specific obligations to provide information on operators not carrying out cross-border parcel delivery – Proportionality.#Case C-345/24.

cjeu_case ·
2693

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#HG v Procura della Repubblica presso il Tribunale di Firenze.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Directive 2014/41/EU – European Investigation Order in criminal matters – Article 3 – Material scope – Concept of ‘investigative measure’ – Purpose – Obtaining evidence – Article 10 – Recourse to a different type of investigative measure – Article 11 – Grounds for non-recognition or non-execution – Fundamental rights – Article 22 – Temporary transfer to the issuing State of the person held in custody for the purpose of carrying out an investigative measure – Article 24 – Hearing of the accused person by videoconference – Article 24(2)(b) – Fundamental principles of the law of the executing Member State.#Case C-325/24.

cjeu_case ·
2694

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Criminal proceedings v HG.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale ordinario di Firenze.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Directive 2014/41/EU – European Investigation Order in criminal matters – Article 3 – Material scope – Concept of ‘investigative measure’ – Purpose – Obtaining evidence – Article 10 – Recourse to a different type of investigative measure – Article 11 – Grounds for non-recognition or non-execution – Fundamental rights – Article 22 – Temporary transfer to the issuing State of the person held in custody for the purpose of carrying out an investigative measure – Article 24 – Hearing of the accused person by videoconference – Article 24(2)(b) – Fundamental principles of the law of the executing Member State.#Case C-325/24.

cjeu_case ·
2695

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Deity Shoes, S.L. v Mundorama Confort, S.L. and Stay Design, S.L.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Intellectual property – Community designs – Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Articles 4 to 6 and 14 – Conditions for the protection of a design – Novelty – Individual character – Visual characteristics predetermined by a third party – Freedom of the designer in developing the design – Concept of ‘informed user’ – Influence of features linked to fashion trends.#Case C-323/24.

cjeu_case ·
2696

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Deity Shoes, S.L. v Mundorama Confort, S.L. and Stay Design, S.L.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Mercantil de Alicante.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Intellectual property – Community designs – Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Articles 4 to 6 and 14 – Conditions for the protection of a design – Novelty – Individual character – Visual characteristics predetermined by a third party – Freedom of the designer in developing the design – Concept of ‘informed user’ – Influence of features linked to fashion trends.#Case C-323/24.

cjeu_case ·
2697

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#CR and TP v Soledil Srl, sous concordat préventif.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Directive 93/13/EEC – Article 6(1) and Article 7(1) – Power of review and obligations of the national court – Penalty clause – No review of the court’s own motion of whether that term is unfair – Res judicata – Principle of effectiveness – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Reliance on the unfairness of a contractual term before a court to which the case has been remitted following cassation.#Case C-320/24.

cjeu_case ·
2698

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#CR and TP v Soledil Srl, sous concordat préventif.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Directive 93/13/EEC – Article 6(1) and Article 7(1) – Power of review and obligations of the national court – Penalty clause – No review of the court’s own motion of whether that term is unfair – Res judicata – Principle of effectiveness – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Reliance on the unfairness of a contractual term before a court to which the case has been remitted following cassation.#Case C-320/24.

cjeu_case ·
2699

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Pesticide Action Network Europe (PAN Europe) v European Commission.#Appeal – Agriculture – Plant protection products – Article 4 – Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/2049 – Renewal of the approval of the active substance ‘cypermethrin’ – Request for internal review – Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 – Article 10(1) – Decision refusing the request – Risk assessment and risk management – Identification of critical areas of concern – Realistic conditions of use – Precautionary principle.#Case C-316/24 P.

cjeu_case ·
2700

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Pesticide Action Network Europe (PAN Europe) v European Commission.#Appeal – Agriculture – Plant protection products – Article 4 – Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/2049 – Renewal of the approval of the active substance ‘cypermethrin’ – Request for internal review – Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 – Article 10(1) – Decision refusing the request – Risk assessment and risk management – Identification of critical areas of concern – Realistic conditions of use – Precautionary principle.#Case C-316/24 P.

cjeu_case ·