Catalogue des documents juridiques

104314 documents
241

Case C-555/25, Gutova: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 30 June 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad – Bulgaria) – RL v AL (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Requirement to state the relationship between the provisions of EU law whose interpretation is sought and the applicable national legislation – Lack of sufficient details – Manifest inadmissibility)

cjeu_case ·
247

Ordonnance de la Cour (septième chambre) du 29 juin 2026.#Technikes Anaktisis kai Diachorismou AE (ECORESET AE) contre Perifereia Attikis.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 99 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Réponse pouvant être clairement déduite de la jurisprudence – Régime d’aides à l’investissement privé – Régime d’aides compatible avec le marché intérieur – Refus par l’autorité compétente d’octroyer une aide au titre de ce régime – Recours juridictionnel tendant à l’annulation de cette décision de refus – Effet rétroactif d’une éventuelle annulation juridictionnelle de ladite décision de refus – Expiration, au cours de la procédure juridictionnelle, du délai prévu pour l’octroi d’une aide au titre dudit régime d’aides – Date à laquelle l’aide concernée est réputée avoir été accordée – Article 47 de la charte des droits fondamentaux de l’Union européenne – Droit à un recours juridictionnel effectif – Règlement (UE) 2015/1589 – Article 1er – Aide existante.#Affaire C-255/25.

cjeu_case ·
248

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 29 June 2026.#Technikes Anaktisis kai Diachorismou AE (ECORESET AE) v Perifereia Attikis.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Reply which may be clearly deduced from existing case-law – Private investment aid scheme – Aid scheme compatible with the internal market – Refusal by the competent authority to grant aid under that scheme – Legal action seeking annulment of that refusal decision – Retroactive effect of a possible judicial annulment of that refusal decision – Expiry, during the legal proceedings, of the period laid down for granting the aid under that aid scheme – Date on which the aid concerned is deemed to have been granted – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to an effective judicial remedy – Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 – Article 1 – Existing aid.#Case C-255/25.

cjeu_case ·
249

Case C-255/25, Technikes Anaktisis kai Diachorismou: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 29 June 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Symvoulio tis Epikrateias – Greece) – Technikes Anaktisis kai Diachorismou AE (ECORESET AE) v Perifereia Attikis (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Reply which may be clearly deduced from existing case-law – Private investment aid scheme – Aid scheme compatible with the internal market – Refusal by the competent authority to grant aid under that scheme – Legal action seeking annulment of that refusal decision – Retroactive effect of a possible judicial annulment of that refusal decision – Expiry, during the legal proceedings, of the period laid down for granting the aid under that aid scheme – Date on which the aid concerned is deemed to have been granted – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to an effective judicial remedy – Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 – Article 1 – Existing aid)

cjeu_case ·
255

Case C-37/26, Ministerul Public – Parchetul de pe lângă Tribunalul Alba: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 26 June 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Alba (Romania)) – XD, with the participation of Ministerul Public – Parchetul de pe lângă Tribunalul Alba (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Requirement to set out the factual and legislative context of the dispute in the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need for an answer from the Court – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility)

cjeu_case ·
257

Arrêt de la Cour (quatrième chambre) du 25 juin 2026.#DL contre Minister van Asiel en Migratie.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Procédure préjudicielle d’urgence – Politique d’immigration – Retour des ressortissants de pays tiers en séjour irrégulier dans un État membre – Directive 2008/115/CE – Article 3, point 3 – Pays de destination – Article 5 – Principe de non-refoulement – Article 15 – Placement en rétention à des fins d’éloignement – Contrôle du respect des conditions de légalité – Moment de l’examen du respect du principe de non-refoulement – Décision de retour indiquant plusieurs pays de destination potentiels – Mesure de rétention – Détermination du pays de destination – Manque de coopération du ressortissant de pays tiers en séjour irrégulier – Article 6, article 19, paragraphe 2, et article 47 de la charte des droits fondamentaux de l’Union européenne.#Affaire C-182/26 PPU.

cjeu_case ·
258

Arrêt de la Cour (quatrième chambre) du 25 juin 2026.#DL contre Minister van Asiel en Migratie.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Procédure préjudicielle d’urgence – Politique d’immigration – Retour des ressortissants de pays tiers en séjour irrégulier dans un État membre – Directive 2008/115/CE – Article 3, point 3 – Pays de destination – Article 5 – Principe de non-refoulement – Article 15 – Placement en rétention à des fins d’éloignement – Contrôle du respect des conditions de légalité – Moment de l’examen du respect du principe de non-refoulement – Décision de retour indiquant plusieurs pays de destination potentiels – Mesure de rétention – Détermination du pays de destination – Manque de coopération du ressortissant de pays tiers en séjour irrégulier – Article 6, article 19, paragraphe 2, et article 47 de la charte des droits fondamentaux de l’Union européenne.#Affaire C-182/26 PPU.

cjeu_case ·
259

Case C-182/26 PPU, Hardeker: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 25 June 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the rechtbank Den Haag, zittingsplaats Haarlem – Netherlands) – DL v Minister van Asiel en Migratie (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Urgent preliminary ruling procedure – Immigration policy – Return of third-country nationals staying illegally in a Member State – Directive 2008/115/EC – Article 3(3) – Country of destination – Article 5 – Principle of non-refoulement – Article 15 – Detention for the purpose of removal – Review of compliance with the conditions governing lawfulness – Time at which compliance with the principle of non-refoulement is examined – Return decision indicating several potential countries of destination – Detention measure – Determination of the country of destination – Lack of cooperation by the illegally staying third-country national – Article 6, Article 19(2) and Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union)

cjeu_case ·
260

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 25 June 2026.#Caisse primaire d'assurance maladie (CPAM) de la Gironde v LX.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Recognition of professional qualifications – Directive 2005/36/EC – Scope – point (a) of Article 3(1) – National legislation laying down the conditions for access to the non-standard-fee sector by self-employed doctors – Doctor who has obtained a qualification within a hospital located in another Member State – Requirement of two years’ experience as an ‘assistant des hôpitaux’ pursuing his or her activity within that hospital under an employment contract – Article 49 TFEU – Freedom of establishment.#Case C-343/25.

cjeu_case ·