Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 315 documents
25171

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 10 February 2022.#Ministre de l’Économie, des Finances et de la Relance v Les Anges d’Eux SARL and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 392 – Margin taxation scheme – Scope – Supply of buildings and building land purchased for the purpose of resale – Taxable person for whom the VAT on the purchase of buildings was not deductible – Resale subject to VAT – Concept of ‘building land’.#Case C-191/21.

cjeu_case ·
25172

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 10 February 2022.#Ministre de l’Économie, des Finances et de la Relance v Les Anges d’Eux SARL and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour administrative d'appel de Lyon.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 392 – Margin taxation scheme – Scope – Supply of buildings and building land purchased for the purpose of resale – Taxable person for whom the VAT on the purchase of buildings was not deductible – Resale subject to VAT – Concept of ‘building land’.#Case C-191/21.

cjeu_case ·
25173

Case C-191/21: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 10 February 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour administrative d’appel de Lyon — France) — Ministre de l’Economie, des Finances et de la Relance v Les Anges d’Eux SARL, Echo 5 SARL, Cletimmo SAS (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Common system of value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Article 392 — Margin taxation scheme — Scope — Supply of buildings and building land purchased for the purpose of resale — Taxable person for whom the VAT on the purchase of buildings was not deductible — Resale subject to VAT — Concept of ‘building land’)

cjeu_case ·
25174

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 February 2022.#UE v ShareWood Switzerland AG and VF.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Law applicable to contractual obligations – Regulation (EC) No 593/2008 (Rome I) – Consumer contracts – Choice of applicable law – Article 6(4)(c) – Exclusion of contracts relating to a right in rem in immovable property or to a tenancy of immovable property – Contract of sale, including a lease agreement and a service agreement, relating to trees planted for the sole purpose of being harvested for profit.#Case C-595/20.

cjeu_case ·
25175

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 February 2022.#UE v ShareWood Switzerland AG and VF.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Law applicable to contractual obligations – Regulation (EC) No 593/2008 (Rome I) – Consumer contracts – Choice of applicable law – Article 6(4)(c) – Exclusion of contracts relating to a right in rem in immovable property or to a tenancy of immovable property – Contract of sale, including a lease agreement and a service agreement, relating to trees planted for the sole purpose of being harvested for profit.#Case C-595/20.

cjeu_case ·
25176

Arrêt de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 10 février 2022.#PF et MF contre Minister for Agriculture Food and the Marine et Sea Fisheries Protection Authority (SFPA).#Renvoi préjudiciel – Politique commune de la pêche – Règlement (CE) no 1224/2009 – Régime de contrôle – Article 33, paragraphe 2, sous a), et article 34 – Enregistrements relatifs aux captures et à l’effort de pêche – Transmission à la Commission européenne des informations relatives aux quantités de langoustines capturées – Possibilité d’utiliser des données autres que celles figurant dans le journal de pêche – Méthode raisonnable et scientifiquement valable pour traiter et vérifier les données – Fermeture de pêcheries.#Affaire C-564/20.

cjeu_case ·
25177

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 10 February 2022.#PF and MF v Minister for Agriculture Food and the Marine and Sea Fisheries Protection Authority (SFPA).#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common fisheries policy – Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 – Control system – Article 33(2)(a) and Article 34 – Recording of catches and fishing effort – Transmission to the European Commission of information concerning the quantities of nephrops caught – Possibility to use data other than those contained in the fishing logbook – Reasonable and scientifically valid method to process and verify data – Closure of fisheries.#Case C-564/20.

cjeu_case ·
25178

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 10 February 2022.#OE v VY.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Validity – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Jurisdiction to hear and determine an application for divorce – Article 18 TFEU – Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 – Fifth and sixth indents of Article 3(1)(a) – Difference between the length of the residence period required for the purposes of determining which court has jurisdiction – Distinction between a resident who is a national of the Member State of the court before which the application is brought and a resident who is not a national of that Member State – No discrimination on grounds of nationality.#Case C-522/20.

cjeu_case ·
25179

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 10 February 2022.#OE v VY.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Validity – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Jurisdiction to hear and determine an application for divorce – Article 18 TFEU – Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 – Fifth and sixth indents of Article 3(1)(a) – Difference between the length of the residence period required for the purposes of determining which court has jurisdiction – Distinction between a resident who is a national of the Member State of the court before which the application is brought and a resident who is not a national of that Member State – No discrimination on grounds of nationality.#Case C-522/20.

cjeu_case ·
25180

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 10 February 2022.#DIMCO Dimovasili M.I.K.E. v Ypourgos Perivallontos kai Energeias.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Directive 97/23/EC – Pressure equipment – CE marking – Placing on the market and putting into service – Restrictions aimed at ensuring the protection of persons – Articles 34 and 36 TFEU – National legislation imposing restrictions on the method of installation of gas pipes.#Case C-499/20.

cjeu_case ·