22941Case T-404/22: Action brought on 29 June 2022 — Deutsche Kreditbank v SRBcjeu_case · 29 juin 2022
22945Case T-388/22: Action brought on 29 June 2022 — Aristotelio Panepistimio Thessalonikis v ERCEAcjeu_case · 29 juin 2022
22946Case T-379/22: Action brought on 29 June 2022 — Diesel v EUIPO — Lidl Stiftung (Joggjeans)cjeu_case · 29 juin 2022
22947Case T-378/22: Action brought on 29 June 2022 — Diesel v EUIPO — Lidl Stiftung (Joggjeans)cjeu_case · 29 juin 2022
22948Case T-377/22: Action brought on 29 June 2022 — Cayago Tec v EUIPO — iAqua (Personal watercraft, Motorboats)cjeu_case · 29 juin 2022
22949Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 29 June 2022.#bet-at-home.com Entertainment GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for registration of the EU figurative mark bet-at-home – Absolute ground for refusal – Lack of distinctive character – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-640/21.cjeu_case · 29 juin 2022
22950Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 29 June 2022.#bet-at-home.com Entertainment GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for registration of the EU figurative mark bet-at-home – Absolute ground for refusal – Lack of distinctive character – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-640/21.cjeu_case · 29 juin 2022
22951Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 29 June 2022.#Jose A. Alfonso Arpon SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark PLUMAflex by Roal – Earlier EU figurative mark PUMA – Relative ground for refusal – Damage to reputation – Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-357/21.cjeu_case · 29 juin 2022
22952Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 29 June 2022.#Jose A. Alfonso Arpon SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark PLUMAflex by Roal – Earlier EU figurative mark PUMA – Relative ground for refusal – Damage to reputation – Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-357/21.cjeu_case · 29 juin 2022
22953Case T-640/21: Judgment of the General Court of 29 June 2022 — bet-at-home.com Entertainment v EUIPO (bet-at-home) (EU trade mark — Application for registration of the EU figurative mark bet-at-home — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 29 juin 2022
22954Case T-357/21: Judgment of the General Court of 29 June 2022 — Jose A. Alfonso Arpon v EUIPO — Puma (PLUMAflex by Roal) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark PLUMAflex by Roal — Earlier EU figurative mark PUMA — Relative ground for refusal — Damage to reputation — Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 29 juin 2022
22955Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 29 June 2022.#Leonine Distribution GmbH v European Commission.#Culture – Creative Europe Programme (2014 to 2020) – MEDIA sub-programme – Call for Proposals EACEA/05/2018 – Decision of the EACEA rejecting the applicant’s application on the ground of failure to comply with the eligibility conditions – Commission decision dismissing the administrative appeal relating to the EACEA’s decision – Concept of ‘European company’ – Grant open only to applicants owned, directly or by majority participation, by nationals of EU Member States or by nationals of other European countries participating in the sub-programme – Errors of assessment – Failure to examine the documents annexed to the proposal – Proportionality.#Case T-641/20.cjeu_case · 29 juin 2022
22956Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 29 June 2022.#Leonine Distribution GmbH v European Commission.#Culture – Creative Europe Programme (2014 to 2020) – MEDIA sub-programme – Call for Proposals EACEA/05/2018 – Decision of the EACEA rejecting the applicant’s application on the ground of failure to comply with the eligibility conditions – Commission decision dismissing the administrative appeal relating to the EACEA’s decision – Concept of ‘European company’ – Grant open only to applicants owned, directly or by majority participation, by nationals of EU Member States or by nationals of other European countries participating in the sub-programme – Errors of assessment – Failure to examine the documents annexed to the proposal – Proportionality.#Case T-641/20.cjeu_case · 29 juin 2022
22957Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 29 June 2022 (Extracts).#LA International Cooperation Srl v European Commission.#Pre-Accession Assistance Instrument – OLAF investigation – Commission decision imposing an administrative sanction – Exclusion from procurement and grant award procedures covered by the general budget of the European Union for a period of four years – Registration in the early detection and exclusion system database – Financial regulation – Unlimited jurisdiction – Proportionality of the sanction.#Case T-609/20.cjeu_case · 29 juin 2022
22958Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 29 June 2022 (Extracts).#LA International Cooperation Srl v European Commission.#Pre-Accession Assistance Instrument – OLAF investigation – Commission decision imposing an administrative sanction – Exclusion from procurement and grant award procedures covered by the general budget of the European Union for a period of four years – Registration in the early detection and exclusion system database – Financial regulation – Unlimited jurisdiction – Proportionality of the sanction.#Case T-609/20.cjeu_case · 29 juin 2022
22959Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 29 June 2022.#Hochmann Marketing GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Board of Appeal decision confirming the revocation of an earlier decision – Article 103(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Request for conversion into a national trade mark application – Ground precluding conversion – Non-use of the EU trade mark – Article 139(2)(a) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Right to be heard – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights.#Case T-337/20.cjeu_case · 29 juin 2022
22960Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 29 June 2022.#Hochmann Marketing GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Board of Appeal decision confirming the revocation of an earlier decision – Article 103(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Request for conversion into a national trade mark application – Ground precluding conversion – Non-use of the EU trade mark – Article 139(2)(a) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Right to be heard – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights.#Case T-337/20.cjeu_case · 29 juin 2022