21701Case T-610/22: Action brought on 30 September 2022 — Nienaber v EUIPO (BoneKare)cjeu_case · 30 septembre 2022
21702Case T-609/22: Action brought on 30 September 2022 — Nienaber v EUIPO — St. Hippolyt Mühle Ebert (BoneKare)cjeu_case · 30 septembre 2022
21703Case T-608/22: Action brought on 30 September 2022 — KHG v EUIPO — Dreams (Dreamer)cjeu_case · 30 septembre 2022
21704Case T-607/22: Action brought on 30 September 2022 — Kozitsyn v Councilcjeu_case · 30 septembre 2022
21705Case T-54/22: Order of the General Court of 30 September 2022 — Rivière v ID (Law governing the institutions — Member of the European Parliament — Suspension and exclusion of a Member from his or her political group — Applicant who has ceased to reply to the Court’s requests — No need to adjudicate)cjeu_case · 30 septembre 2022
21706Case T-53/22: Order of the General Court of 30 September 2022 — Collard v ID (Law governing the institutions — Member of the European Parliament — Suspension and exclusion of a Member from his or her political group — Applicant who has ceased to reply to the Court’s requests — No need to adjudicate)cjeu_case · 30 septembre 2022
21707Case C-625/22 P: Appeal brought on 30 September 2022 by Grail LLC against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber, Extended Composition) delivered on 13 July 2022 in Case T-227/21, Illumina v Commissioncjeu_case · 30 septembre 2022
21708Case C-624/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État (France) lodged on 30 September 2022 — Société BP France v Ministre de l’Économie, des Finances et de la Souveraineté industrielle et numériquecjeu_case · 30 septembre 2022
21709Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 30 September 2022.#'ĒDIENS & KM.LV' PS v Ieslodzījuma vietu pārvalde and Iepirkumu uzraudzības birojs.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – Public procurement – Directive 2014/24/EU – Conduct of the procedure – Choice of participants – Selection criteria – Technical and professional capacities – Article 58(4) – Forms of evidence – European Single Procurement Document – Article 59 – Reliance on the capacities of other entities – Article 63(1) – Group of economic operators – Condition relating to professional experience to be satisfied by the member of the group responsible, in the event of the award of the contract, for performing the activities requiring that experience – Condition not provided for in the procurement documents – Status of general partnership unaffected by the system of joint and several liability.#Case C-592/21.cjeu_case · 30 septembre 2022
21710Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 30 September 2022.#'ĒDIENS & KM.LV' PS v Ieslodzījuma vietu pārvalde and Iepirkumu uzraudzības birojs.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administratīvā rajona tiesa.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – Public procurement – Directive 2014/24/EU – Conduct of the procedure – Choice of participants – Selection criteria – Technical and professional capacities – Article 58(4) – Forms of evidence – European Single Procurement Document – Article 59 – Reliance on the capacities of other entities – Article 63(1) – Group of economic operators – Condition relating to professional experience to be satisfied by the member of the group responsible, in the event of the award of the contract, for performing the activities requiring that experience – Condition not provided for in the procurement documents – Status of general partnership unaffected by the system of joint and several liability.#Case C-592/21.cjeu_case · 30 septembre 2022
21711Case C-592/21: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 30 September 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Administratīvā rajona tiesa — Latvia) — ‘ĒDIENS & KM.LV’ PS v Ieslodzījuma vietu pārvalde, Iepirkumu uzraudzības birojs (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Public procurement — Directive 2014/24/EU — Conduct of the procedure — Choice of participants — Selection criteria — Technical and professional capacities — Article 58(4) — Forms of evidence — European Single Procurement Document — Article 59 — Reliance on the capacities of other entities — Article 63(1) — Group of economic operators — Condition relating to professional experience to be satisfied by the member of the group responsible, in the event of the award of the contract, for performing the activities requiring that experience — Condition not provided for in the procurement documents — Status of general partnership unaffected by the system of joint and several liability)cjeu_case · 30 septembre 2022
21713Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 29 September 2022.#CX v European Commission.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Civil service – Official – Investigation by the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) – Unauthorised and clandestine negotiation of a contract – Conflict of interests – Disciplinary measure – Removal from post – Right to be heard – Repeated absence of the applicant and his lawyer from the disciplinary hearing – Distortion of the evidence – Duty of the European Commission to have regard for the welfare of its staff – Obligation to state reasons – Principle ne bis in idem – Reasonable time – Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.#Case C-71/22 P.cjeu_case · 29 septembre 2022
21714Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 29 September 2022.#CX v European Commission.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Civil service – Official – Investigation by the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) – Unauthorised and clandestine negotiation of a contract – Conflict of interests – Disciplinary measure – Removal from post – Right to be heard – Repeated absence of the applicant and his lawyer from the disciplinary hearing – Distortion of the evidence – Duty of the European Commission to have regard for the welfare of its staff – Obligation to state reasons – Principle ne bis in idem – Reasonable time – Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.#Case C-71/22 P.cjeu_case · 29 septembre 2022
21715Case C-623/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour constitutionnelle (Belgium) lodged on 29 September 2022 — Belgian Association of Tax Lawyers and Others v Premier ministre/ Eerste Ministercjeu_case · 29 septembre 2022
21716Case C-622/22: Action brought on 29 September 2022 — European Commission v Republic of Maltacjeu_case · 29 septembre 2022
21717Case C-621/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam (Netherlands) lodged on 29 September 2022 — Koninklijke Nederlandse Lawn Tennisbond v Autoriteit Persoonsgegevenscjeu_case · 29 septembre 2022
21718Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 29 September 2022.#Health Information Management (HIM) v European Commission.#Appeal – Arbitration clause – Grant agreements concluded under the Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) Policy Support Programme – Audit report – Debit notes issued by the European Commission for the recovery of certain sums – Action for annulment – Investigation by the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) – Counterclaim – Full repayment of the grants concerned – Rights of the defence – Principle of sound administration – Impartiality – Principle of proportionality – Obligation to state reasons.#Case C-500/21 P.cjeu_case · 29 septembre 2022
21719Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 29 September 2022.#Health Information Management (HIM) v European Commission.#Appeal – Arbitration clause – Grant agreements concluded under the Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) Policy Support Programme – Audit report – Debit notes issued by the European Commission for the recovery of certain sums – Action for annulment – Investigation by the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) – Counterclaim – Full repayment of the grants concerned – Rights of the defence – Principle of sound administration – Impartiality – Principle of proportionality – Obligation to state reasons.#Case C-500/21 P.cjeu_case · 29 septembre 2022
21720Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 29 September 2022.#Raiffeisen Leasing v Republika Slovenija.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 203 – Sale-and-lease back agreement – Persons liable for payment of VAT – Possibility of treating a written contractual agreement as an invoice.#Case C-235/21.cjeu_case · 29 septembre 2022