21361Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 19 October 2022.#Dino Baumberger v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – European Union figurative mark Lío – Absolute ground for invalidity – Bad faith – Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-466/21.cjeu_case · 19 octobre 2022
21362Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 19 October 2022.#Dino Baumberger v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – European Union figurative mark Lío – Absolute ground for invalidity – Bad faith – Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-466/21.cjeu_case · 19 octobre 2022
21363Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 19 October 2022.#Greenwich Polo Club, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark GREENWICH POLO CLUB – Earlier EU word mark BEVERLY HILLS POLO CLUB – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Scope of the examination to be carried out by the Board of Appeal – Article 71 of Regulation 2017/1001 – Article 27(2) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625.#Case T-437/21.cjeu_case · 19 octobre 2022
21364Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 19 October 2022.#Greenwich Polo Club, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark GREENWICH POLO CLUB – Earlier EU word mark BEVERLY HILLS POLO CLUB – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Scope of the examination to be carried out by the Board of Appeal – Article 71 of Regulation 2017/1001 – Article 27(2) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625.#Case T-437/21.cjeu_case · 19 octobre 2022
21365Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 19 October 2022.#Castel Frères v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU figurative mark representing Chinese characters – Genuine use of the trade mark – Article 18(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Alteration of the distinctive character.#Case T-323/21.cjeu_case · 19 octobre 2022
21366Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 19 October 2022.#Castel Frères v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU figurative mark representing Chinese characters – Genuine use of the trade mark – Article 18(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Alteration of the distinctive character.#Case T-323/21.cjeu_case · 19 octobre 2022
21367Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 19 October 2022.#Louis Vuitton Malletier v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark representing a chequerboard pattern – Absolute ground for invalidity – No distinctive character acquired through use – Article 7(3) and Article 51(2) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(3) and Article 59(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Overall assessment of the evidence of distinctive character acquired through use – Geographical scope of the evidence of distinctive character acquired through use – Evidence of use of the mark on the internet – Evidence regarding infringement proceedings.#Case T-275/21.cjeu_case · 19 octobre 2022
21368Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 19 October 2022.#Louis Vuitton Malletier v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark representing a chequerboard pattern – Absolute ground for invalidity – No distinctive character acquired through use – Article 7(3) and Article 51(2) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(3) and Article 59(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Overall assessment of the evidence of distinctive character acquired through use – Geographical scope of the evidence of distinctive character acquired through use – Evidence of use of the mark on the internet – Evidence regarding infringement proceedings.#Case T-275/21.cjeu_case · 19 octobre 2022
21369Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 19 October 2022.#Praesidiad Holding v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing a post – Ground for invalidity – Failure to comply with the requirements for protection – Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Features of appearance of a product solely dictated by its technical function – Article 8(1) of Regulation No 6/2002.#Case T-231/21.cjeu_case · 19 octobre 2022
21370Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 19 October 2022.#Praesidiad Holding v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing a post – Ground for invalidity – Failure to comply with the requirements for protection – Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Features of appearance of a product solely dictated by its technical function – Article 8(1) of Regulation No 6/2002.#Case T-231/21.cjeu_case · 19 octobre 2022
21371Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 19 October 2022.#"Sistem ecologica" production, trade and services d.o.o. Srbac v European Commission.#Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 883/2013 – Investigation into evasion of the conventional, countervailing and anti-dumping duties imposed on imports of biodiesel into the Union – OLAF Communication to national customs authorities – OLAF investigation report – Action for annulment – Act not open to challenge – Claim for compensation – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals.#Case T-81/21.cjeu_case · 19 octobre 2022
21372Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 19 October 2022.#"Sistem ecologica" production, trade and services d.o.o. Srbac v European Commission.#Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 883/2013 – Investigation into evasion of the conventional, countervailing and anti-dumping duties imposed on imports of biodiesel into the European Union – OLAF Communication to national customs authorities – OLAF investigation report – Action for annulment – Act not open to challenge – Claim for compensation – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals.#Case T-81/21.cjeu_case · 19 octobre 2022
21373Case T-514/21: Order of the General Court of 19 October 2022 — Associazione ‘Terra Mia Amici No Tap’ v EIB (Action for failure to act — Environment — Financing of the Trans Adriatic Pipeline — Resolution of the Board of Directors of the EIB approving the financing — Article 10 of Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 — Request for internal review — Answer given after the action was brought — Application for an injunction — Lack of jurisdiction — Plea of inadmissibility — No need to adjudicate)cjeu_case · 19 octobre 2022
21374Case T-718/21: Judgment of the General Court of 19 October 2022 — Kaczorowska v EUIPO — Groupe Marcelle (MAESELLE) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark MAESELLE — Earlier EU figurative mark MARCELLE — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 19 octobre 2022
21375Case T-716/21: Judgment of the General Court of 19 October 2022 — Kaczorowska v EUIPO — Groupe Marcelle (MAESELLE) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark MAESELLE — Earlier EU figurative mark MARCELLE — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 19 octobre 2022
21376Case T-467/21: Judgment of the General Court of 19 October 2022 — DBM Videovertrieb v EUIPO — Nube (Lío) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — European Union figurative mark Lío — Absolute ground for invalidity — Bad faith — Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))cjeu_case · 19 octobre 2022
21377Case T-466/21: Judgment of the General Court of 19 October 2022 — Baumberger v EUIPO — Nube (Lío) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — European Union figurative mark Lío — Absolute ground for invalidity — Bad faith — Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))cjeu_case · 19 octobre 2022
21378Case T-437/21: Judgment of the General Court of 19 October 2022 — Greenwich Polo Club v EUIPO — Lifestyle Equities (GREENWICH POLO CLUB) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark GREENWICH POLO CLUB — Earlier EU word mark BEVERLY HILLS POLO CLUB — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Scope of the examination to be carried out by the Board of Appeal — Article 71 of Regulation 2017/1001 — Article 27(2) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625)cjeu_case · 19 octobre 2022
21379Case T-323/21: Judgment of the General Court of 19 October 2022 — Castel Frères v EUIPO — Shanghai Panati (Representation of Chinese characters) (EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU figurative mark representing Chinese characters — Genuine use of the trade mark — Article 18(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Alteration of the distinctive character)cjeu_case · 19 octobre 2022
21380Case T-275/21: Judgment of the General Court of 19 October 2022 — Louis Vuitton Malletier v EUIPO — Wisniewski (Representation of a chequerboard pattern II) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Figurative mark representing a chequerboard pattern — Absolute ground for invalidity — No distinctive character acquired through use — Article 7(3) and Article 51(2) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(3) and Article 59(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Overall assessment of the evidence of distinctive character acquired through use — Geographical scope of the evidence of distinctive character acquired through use — Evidence of use of the mark on the internet — Evidence regarding infringement proceedings)cjeu_case · 19 octobre 2022