21341Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 20 October 2022.#INVEST FUND MANAGEMENT v Komisia za finansov nadzor.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Directive 2009/65/EC – Undertakings for collective investment in transferable securities (UCITS) – UCITS management companies – Obligations concerning information to be provided to investors – Article 72 – Obligation to update the ‘essential elements of the prospectus’ – Scope – Article 69(2) – Information referred to in Schedule A of Annex I – Composition of a body of the management company – Article 99a(r) – Transposition into national law – National legislation extending the situations in which an infringement relating to the updating of the prospectus may be established and penalised.#Case C-473/20.cjeu_case · 20 octobre 2022
21342Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 20 October 2022.#European Commission v CK Telecoms UK Investments Ltd.#Appeal – Competition – Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 – Control of concentrations of undertakings – Mobile telecommunications services – Decision declaring a concentration incompatible with the internal market – Oligopolistic market – Significant impediment to effective competition – Non-coordinated effects – Standard of proof – European Commission’s margin of discretion with regard to economic matters – Limits of judicial review – Guidelines on horizontal mergers – Factors relevant to demonstrating a significant impediment to effective competition – Concepts of ‘important competitive force’ and ‘close competitors’ – Closeness of competition between the parties to the concentration – Quantitative analysis of the effects of the proposed concentration on prices – Efficiencies – Distortion – Complaint raised by the General Court of the European Union of its own motion – Annulment.#Case C-376/20 P.cjeu_case · 20 octobre 2022
21343Case C-604/20: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 October 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesarbeitsgericht — Germany) — ROI Land Investments Ltd. v FD (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 — Article 6 — Defendant not domiciled in a Member State — Article 17 — Jurisdiction over consumer contracts — Concept of ‘trade or profession’ — Article 21 — Jurisdiction over individual contracts of employment — Concept of ‘employer’ — Relationship of subordination — Regulation (EC) No 593/2008 — Applicable law — Article 6 — Individual employment contract — Letter of comfort between the employee and a third party company ensuring fulfilment of the employer’s obligations vis-à-vis that employee)cjeu_case · 20 octobre 2022
21344Case C-585/20: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 October 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado Contencioso-Administrativo No 2 de Valladolid — Spain) — BFF Finance Iberia S.A.U v Gerencia Regional de Salud de la Junta de Castilla y León (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 2011/7/EU — Combating late payment in commercial transactions — Recovery from a public authority of claims assigned by undertakings to a debt collection agency — Compensation for the recovery costs incurred by the creditor in the event of late payment by the debtor — Article 6 — Fixed minimum sum of EUR 40 — Transactions between undertakings and public authorities — Article 4 — Procedure for certification of the conformity of goods or services — Payment period — Article 2(8) — Concept of ‘amount due’ — Taking account of value added tax for the purpose of calculating interest for late payment)cjeu_case · 20 octobre 2022
21345Case C-473/20: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 20 October 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad — Bulgaria) — ‘Invest Fund Management’ AD v Komisia za finansov nadzor (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Approximation of laws — Directive 2009/65/EC — Undertakings for collective investment in transferable securities (UCITS) — UCITS management companies — Obligations concerning information to be provided to investors — Article 72 — Obligation to keep the ‘essential elements of the prospectus’ up to date — Scope — Article 69(2) — Information specified in Schedule A of Annex I — Composition of a body of the management company — Article 99a(r) — Transposition into national law — National regulation extending the scope for detection of and imposition of a penalty for an offence relating to the keeping up to date of the prospectus)cjeu_case · 20 octobre 2022
21346Case T-653/22: Action brought on 19 October 2022 — Silex v Commissioncjeu_case · 19 octobre 2022
21347Case T-652/22: Action brought on 19 October 2022 — Lidl Stiftung v EUIPO — MHCS (Shade of the colour orange)cjeu_case · 19 octobre 2022
21348Case T-138/22: Order of the General Court of 19 October 2022 — HCP v EUIPO — Timm Health Care (PYLOMED)cjeu_case · 19 octobre 2022
21349Case C-663/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio (Italy) lodged on 19 October 2022 — Expedia Inc. v Autorità per le Garanzie nelle Comunicazionicjeu_case · 19 octobre 2022
21350Case C-662/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio (Italy) lodged on 19 October 2022 — Airbnb Ireland UC v Autorità per le Garanzie nelle Comunicazionicjeu_case · 19 octobre 2022
21351Case C-658/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy (Poland) lodged on 19 October 2022cjeu_case · 19 octobre 2022
21352Case C-656/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Varhoven administrativen sad (Bulgaria) lodged on 19 October 2022 — Askos Properties EOOD v Zamestnik izpalnitelen direktor na Darzhaven fond ‘Zemedelie’cjeu_case · 19 octobre 2022
21353Case C-655/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany) lodged on 19 October 2022 — I (*) GmbH & Co. KG v Hauptzollamt HZA (*)cjeu_case · 19 octobre 2022
21354Case C-654/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank van eerste aanleg Oost-Vlaanderen, afdeling Gent (Belgium) lodged on 19 October 2022 — FOD Volksgezondheid, Veiligheid van de voedselketen & Leefmilieu v Triferto Belgium NVcjeu_case · 19 octobre 2022
21355Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 19 October 2022.#Katarzyna Kaczorowska v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark MAESELLE – Earlier EU figurative mark MARCELLE – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-718/21.cjeu_case · 19 octobre 2022
21356Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 19 October 2022.#Katarzyna Kaczorowska v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark MAESELLE – Earlier EU figurative mark MARCELLE – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-718/21.cjeu_case · 19 octobre 2022
21357Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 19 October 2022.#Katarzyna Kaczorowska v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark MAESELLE – Earlier EU figurative mark MARCELLE – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-716/21.cjeu_case · 19 octobre 2022
21358Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 19 October 2022.#Katarzyna Kaczorowska v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark MAESELLE – Earlier EU figurative mark MARCELLE – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-716/21.cjeu_case · 19 octobre 2022
21359Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 19 October 2022.#DBM Videovertrieb GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – European Union figurative mark Lío – Absolute ground for invalidity – Bad faith – Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-467/21.cjeu_case · 19 octobre 2022
21360Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 19 October 2022.#DBM Videovertrieb GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – European Union figurative mark Lío – Absolute ground for invalidity – Bad faith – Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-467/21.cjeu_case · 19 octobre 2022