Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 314 documents
20223

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 21 December 2022.#Simba Toys GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark BIMBA TOYS – Earlier international word and figurative marks Simba – Earlier trade name Simba Toys GmbH & Co. KG – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Comparison of the goods – Article 8(4) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Proximity of the economic sectors.#Case T-129/22.

cjeu_case ·
20224

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 21 December 2022.#Simba Toys GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark BIMBA TOYS – Earlier international word and figurative marks Simba – Earlier trade name Simba Toys GmbH & Co. KG – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Comparison of the goods – Article 8(4) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Proximity of the economic sectors.#Case T-129/22.

cjeu_case ·
20227

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 21 December 2022.#International Masis Tabak LLC v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark representing a pack of cigarettes – Earlier international figurative mark Marlboro SELECTED PREMIUM TOBACCOS – Relative ground for refusal – Damage to reputation – Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-44/22.

cjeu_case ·
20228

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 21 December 2022.#International Masis Tabak LLC v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark representing a pack of cigarettes – Earlier international figurative mark Marlboro SELECTED PREMIUM TOBACCOS – Relative ground for refusal – Damage to reputation – Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-44/22.

cjeu_case ·
20234

Case T-129/22: Judgment of the General Court of 21 December 2022 — Simba Toys v EUIPO — Master Gift Import (BIMBA TOYS) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark BIMBA TOYS — Earlier international word and figurative marks Simba — Earlier trade name Simba Toys GmbH & Co. KG — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Comparison of the goods — Article 8(4) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Proximity of the economic sectors)

cjeu_case ·
20236

Case T-44/22: Judgment of the General Court of 21 December 2022 — International Masis Tabak v EUIPO — Philip Morris Brands (Representation of a pack of cigarettes) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Figurative mark representing a pack of cigarettes — Earlier international figurative mark Marlboro SELECTED PREMIUM TOBACCOS — Relative ground for refusal — Damage to reputation — Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

cjeu_case ·
20239

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 21 December 2022.#Fallimento Villa di Campo Srl v Agenzia delle Entrate.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Requirement that the national court indicate the relationship between the provisions of EU law the interpretation of which is sought and the national legislation applicable to the main proceedings – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-250/22.

cjeu_case ·
20240

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 21 December 2022.#Fallimento Villa di Campo Srl v Agenzia delle Entrate.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Requirement that the national court indicate the relationship between the provisions of EU law the interpretation of which is sought and the national legislation applicable to the main proceedings – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-250/22.

cjeu_case ·