20221Case T-792/22: Action brought on 21 December 2022 — Quatrotec Electrónica v EUIPO — Woxter Technology (WOXTER)cjeu_case · 21 décembre 2022
20222Case T-791/22: Action brought on 21 December 2022 — Broad Far (Hong Kong) and M21 v Commissioncjeu_case · 21 décembre 2022
20223Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 21 December 2022.#Simba Toys GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark BIMBA TOYS – Earlier international word and figurative marks Simba – Earlier trade name Simba Toys GmbH & Co. KG – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Comparison of the goods – Article 8(4) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Proximity of the economic sectors.#Case T-129/22.cjeu_case · 21 décembre 2022
20224Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 21 December 2022.#Simba Toys GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark BIMBA TOYS – Earlier international word and figurative marks Simba – Earlier trade name Simba Toys GmbH & Co. KG – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Comparison of the goods – Article 8(4) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Proximity of the economic sectors.#Case T-129/22.cjeu_case · 21 décembre 2022
20225Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 21 December 2022.#OM v European Commission.#Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – Recruitment – Vacancy notice – Rejection of application – Appointment of another candidate – Position of Member of the Regulatory Scrutiny Board – Obligation to state reasons – Infringement of the vacancy notice – Legitimate expectation – Equal treatment – Manifest error of assessment.#Case T-118/22.cjeu_case · 21 décembre 2022
20226Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 21 December 2022.#OM v European Commission.#Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – Recruitment – Vacancy notice – Rejection of application – Appointment of another candidate – Position of Member of the Regulatory Scrutiny Board – Obligation to state reasons – Infringement of the vacancy notice – Legitimate expectation – Equal treatment – Manifest error of assessment.#Case T-118/22.cjeu_case · 21 décembre 2022
20227Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 21 December 2022.#International Masis Tabak LLC v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark representing a pack of cigarettes – Earlier international figurative mark Marlboro SELECTED PREMIUM TOBACCOS – Relative ground for refusal – Damage to reputation – Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-44/22.cjeu_case · 21 décembre 2022
20228Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 21 December 2022.#International Masis Tabak LLC v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark representing a pack of cigarettes – Earlier international figurative mark Marlboro SELECTED PREMIUM TOBACCOS – Relative ground for refusal – Damage to reputation – Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-44/22.cjeu_case · 21 décembre 2022
20229Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 21 December 2022.#Sanrio Co. Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark SANRIO CHARACTERS – Earlier EU word mark CARACTÈRE – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-43/22.cjeu_case · 21 décembre 2022
20230Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 21 December 2022.#Sanrio Co. Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark SANRIO CHARACTERS – Earlier EU word mark CARACTÈRE – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-43/22.cjeu_case · 21 décembre 2022
20231Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 21 December 2022.#Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark PUMA – Earlier international figurative mark PUMA – Relative ground for refusal – Detriment to reputation – Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-4/22.cjeu_case · 21 décembre 2022
20232Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 21 December 2022.#Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark PUMA – Earlier international figurative mark PUMA – Relative ground for refusal – Detriment to reputation – Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-4/22.cjeu_case · 21 décembre 2022
20233Case T-264/22: Order of the General Court of 21 December 2022 — Suicha v EUIPO — Michael Kors (Switzerland) International (MK MARKTOMI MARKTOMI) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU figurative mark MK MARKTOMI — Earlier EU figurative mark MK MICHAEL KORS — Relative ground for invalidity — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)cjeu_case · 21 décembre 2022
20234Case T-129/22: Judgment of the General Court of 21 December 2022 — Simba Toys v EUIPO — Master Gift Import (BIMBA TOYS) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark BIMBA TOYS — Earlier international word and figurative marks Simba — Earlier trade name Simba Toys GmbH & Co. KG — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Comparison of the goods — Article 8(4) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Proximity of the economic sectors)cjeu_case · 21 décembre 2022
20235Case T-118/22: Judgment of the General Court of 21 December 2022 — OM v Commission (Civil service — Members of the temporary staff — Recruitment — Vacancy notice — Rejection of application — Appointment of another candidate — Position of Member of the Regulatory Scrutiny Board — Obligation to state reasons — Infringement of the vacancy notice — Legitimate expectation — Equal treatment — Manifest error of assessment)cjeu_case · 21 décembre 2022
20236Case T-44/22: Judgment of the General Court of 21 December 2022 — International Masis Tabak v EUIPO — Philip Morris Brands (Representation of a pack of cigarettes) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Figurative mark representing a pack of cigarettes — Earlier international figurative mark Marlboro SELECTED PREMIUM TOBACCOS — Relative ground for refusal — Damage to reputation — Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 21 décembre 2022
20237Case T-43/22: Judgment of the General Court of 21 December 2022 — Sanrio v EUIPO — Miroglio Fashion (SANRIO CHARACTERS) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark SANRIO CHARACTERS — Earlier EU word mark CARACTÈRE — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))cjeu_case · 21 décembre 2022
20238Case T-4/22: Judgment of the General Court of 21 December 2022 — Puma v EUIPO — DN Solutions (PUMA) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark PUMA — Earlier international figurative mark PUMA — Relative ground for refusal — Detriment to reputation — Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))cjeu_case · 21 décembre 2022
20239Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 21 December 2022.#Fallimento Villa di Campo Srl v Agenzia delle Entrate.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Requirement that the national court indicate the relationship between the provisions of EU law the interpretation of which is sought and the national legislation applicable to the main proceedings – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-250/22.cjeu_case · 21 décembre 2022
20240Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 21 December 2022.#Fallimento Villa di Campo Srl v Agenzia delle Entrate.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Requirement that the national court indicate the relationship between the provisions of EU law the interpretation of which is sought and the national legislation applicable to the main proceedings – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-250/22.cjeu_case · 21 décembre 2022