Documents : Union européenne

Union supranationale de 27 États membres. Les actes officiels (règlements, directives, décisions) sont publiés par l'Office des publications de l'UE (Cellar/EUR-Lex). La jurisprudence de la Cour de justice de l'UE (CJUE) relève également d'un organe de l'UE.

Site officiel ↗

Types de documents
regulation (161375) cjeu_case (104317) decision (43264) directive (8068)
317 024 documents
1061

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 June 2026.#Vodovody a kanalizace Přerov, a.s. v Úřad pro ochranu osobních údajů.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Open data and the re-use of public sector information – Directive (EU) 2019/1024 – Article 2(3) – Jurisdiction of the Court of Justice – Concept of ‘public undertaking’ – Undertaking owned by several public sector bodies – Presumption of ‘dominant influence’ – Criteria for assessment.#Case C-575/24.

cjeu_case ·
1062

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 June 2026.#BG v Ministero della Difesa.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Equal treatment in employment and occupation – Directive 2000/78/EC – Article 1 – Purpose – Article 2(2)(a) and (b) – Prohibition of discrimination on the ground of belief – National legislation requiring military personnel to be vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 – Difference in treatment based on membership of a particular professional category – Concept of ‘belief’.#Case C-522/24.

cjeu_case ·
1063

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 June 2026.#BG v Ministero della Difesa.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Equal treatment in employment and occupation – Directive 2000/78/EC – Article 1 – Purpose – Article 2(2)(a) and (b) – Prohibition of discrimination on the ground of belief – National legislation requiring military personnel to be vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 – Difference in treatment based on membership of a particular professional category – Concept of ‘belief’.#Case C-522/24.

cjeu_case ·
1064

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 June 2026.#NTH Haustechnik GmbH v EM.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 5(1)(e) – Storage limitation – Point (e) of the first subparagraph of Article 6 – Lawfulness of processing such data relating to a contract of employment in judicial proceedings – Article 17(3)(e) – No obligation to erase such data where processing is necessary for the establishment, exercise or defence of legal claims – Data collected by the employer with a view to proving a serious failure by the employee to comply with his or her obligations – Use of evidence obtained unlawfully.#Case C-484/24.

cjeu_case ·
1065

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 June 2026.#NTH Haustechnik GmbH v EM.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 5(1)(e) – Storage limitation – Point (e) of the first subparagraph of Article 6 – Lawfulness of processing such data relating to a contract of employment in judicial proceedings – Article 17(3)(e) – No obligation to erase such data where processing is necessary for the establishment, exercise or defence of legal claims – Data collected by the employer with a view to proving a serious failure by the employee to comply with his or her obligations – Use of evidence obtained unlawfully.#Case C-484/24.

cjeu_case ·
1066

Arrêt de la Cour (première chambre) du 18 juin 2026.#Datenschutzbehörde et Dr. G S.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Protection des personnes physiques à l’égard du traitement des données à caractère personnel – Règlement (UE) 2016/679 – Articles 77 et 79 – Voies de recours – Exercice parallèle – Articulation entre l’introduction d’une réclamation auprès d’une autorité nationale de contrôle et l’exercice d’un recours juridictionnel – Risque de décisions contradictoires – Principe de protection juridictionnelle effective – Autonomie procédurale des États membres – Principe d’effectivité – Principe d’équivalence.#Affaire C-414/24.

cjeu_case ·
1067

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 18 June 2026.#Datenschutzbehörde and Dr. G S v Bundesministerin für Justiz and D GmbH.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Articles 77 and 79 – Remedies – Parallel exercise – Relationship between the lodging of a complaint with a national supervisory authority and the exercise of a judicial remedy – Risk of contradictory decisions – Principle of effective judicial protection – Procedural autonomy of the Member States – Principle of effectiveness – Principle of equivalence.#Case C-414/24.

cjeu_case ·
1068

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 18 June 2026.#MT v Comité de direction de l’Autorité des Services et des Marchés Financiers (FSMA).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2003/6/EC – Article 3 – Regulation (EU) No 596/2014 – Article 10 – Unlawful disclosure of inside information – Insider dealing and market abuse – Financial services – Article 21 – Disclosure or dissemination of information in the media – Disclosure of inside information in the media by a politician – Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, signed at Rome on 4 November 1950 – Article 10 – Article 11 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Freedom of expression – Article 52(1) and (3) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Interpretation and limitation on the exercise of that freedom.#Case C-376/24.

cjeu_case ·
1069

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 18 June 2026.#MT v Comité de direction de l’Autorité des Services et des Marchés Financiers (FSMA).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2003/6/EC – Article 3 – Regulation (EU) No 596/2014 – Article 10 – Unlawful disclosure of inside information – Insider dealing and market abuse – Financial services – Article 21 – Disclosure or dissemination of information in the media – Disclosure of inside information in the media by a politician – Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, signed at Rome on 4 November 1950 – Article 10 – Article 11 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Freedom of expression – Article 52(1) and (3) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Interpretation and limitation on the exercise of that freedom.#Case C-376/24.

cjeu_case ·
1072

Case C-880/24 P: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 18 June 2026 – VK v Commission (Appeal – Civil service – Temporary staff – Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union – Article 77 – Article 11(2) of Annex VIII – Article 5(1), sixth subparagraph, of the general implementing provisions for Articles 11 and 12 of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations on the transfer of pension rights – Retirement pension – Pension rights acquired before entry into the service of the European Union – Time limit within which an application for transfer to the pension scheme of the EU institutions must be submitted – Rejection of a transfer application submitted after the deadline – Exceptional circumstances – COVID-19 pandemic)

cjeu_case ·
1073

Joined Cases C-816/24 P to C-818/24 P: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 18 June 2026 – Belaruskali and Others v Council (Appeal – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Belarus and the involvement of Belarus in the Russian aggression against Ukraine – Freezing of funds and economic resources – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds – Inclusion of the appellants’ names – Definition of Lukashenko regime – Definition of persons benefiting from or supporting that regime – Obligation to state reasons – Principles of legal certainty and proportionality)

cjeu_case ·
1074

Case C-754/24 P: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 18 June 2026 – Fachverband Eisenhüttenschlacken v Commission (Appeal – Regulation (EU) 2019/1009 – Article 42(7) and (8) – Making available on the market of EU fertilising products – Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/973 – Article 2(2) and (3) – Criteria on agronomic efficiency and safety for the use of by-products in EU fertilising products – Limit values for chromium and vanadium in EU fertilising products using ferrous slags as by-products – Precautionary principle – Principle of proportionality)

cjeu_case ·
1075

Case C-658/24, Penny Market: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 June 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Győri Törvényszék – Hungary) – Penny Market Kft. v Komárom-Esztergom Vármegyei Kormányhivatal (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Freedom of establishment – Freedom to provide services – Common organisation of the markets in agricultural products – Services in the internal market – National legislation imposing an obligation, for a specified period, on retailers of foodstuffs with a turnover in excess of a certain amount, to reduce the prices of certain foodstuffs and to have minimum quantities of those foodstuffs in stock – Measure taken as a result of a situation of emergency – Fines)

cjeu_case ·
1076

Case C-575/24, Vodovody a kanalizace Přerov: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 June 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Městský soud v Praze – Czech Republic) – Vodovody a kanalizace Přerov, a.s. v Úřad pro ochranu osobních údajů (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Open data and the re-use of public sector information – Directive (EU) 2019/1024 – Article 2(3) – Jurisdiction of the Court of Justice – Concept of public undertaking – Undertaking owned by several public sector bodies – Presumption of dominant influence – Criteria for assessment)

cjeu_case ·
1077

Case C-522/24, Ministero della Difesa (Vaccination requirement for military personnel): Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 June 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato – Italy) – BG v Ministero della Difesa (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Equal treatment in employment and occupation – Directive 2000/78/EC – Article 1 – Purpose – Article 2(2)(a) and (b) – Prohibition of discrimination on the ground of belief – National legislation requiring military personnel to be vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 – Difference in treatment based on membership of a particular professional category – Concept of belief)

cjeu_case ·
1078

Case C-484/24, NTH Haustechnik: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 June 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesarbeitsgericht Niedersachsen – Germany) – NTH Haustechnik GmbH v EM (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 5(1)(e) – Storage limitation – Point (e) of the first subparagraph of Article 6 – Lawfulness of processing such data relating to a contract of employment in judicial proceedings – Article 17(3)(e) – No obligation to erase such data where processing is necessary for the establishment, exercise or defence of legal claims – Data collected by the employer with a view to proving a serious failure by the employee to comply with his or her obligations – Use of evidence obtained unlawfully)

cjeu_case ·
1079

Case C-414/24, Datenschutzbehörde (Relationship between remedies): Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 18 June 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof – Austria) – Datenschutzbehörde, Dr. G S (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Articles 77 and 79 – Remedies – Parallel exercise – Relationship between the lodging of a complaint with a national supervisory authority and the exercise of a judicial remedy – Risk of contradictory decisions – Principle of effective judicial protection – Procedural autonomy of the Member States – Principle of effectiveness – Principle of equivalence)

cjeu_case ·
1080

Case C-376/24, FSMA: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 18 June 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d'appel de Bruxelles – Belgium) – MT v Comité de direction de l’Autorité des Services et des Marchés Financiers (FSMA) (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2003/6/EC – Article 3 – Regulation (EU) No 596/2014 – Article 10 – Unlawful disclosure of inside information – Insider dealing and market abuse – Financial services – Article 21 – Disclosure or dissemination of information in the media – Disclosure of inside information in the media by a politician – Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, signed at Rome on 4 November 1950 – Article 10 – Article 11 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Freedom of expression – Article 52(1) and (3) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Interpretation and limitation on the exercise of that freedom)

cjeu_case ·