Documents : Union européenne

63221

Opinion of Advocate General Saugmandsgaard Øe delivered on 28 February 2019.#Baltic Media Alliance Ltd v Lietuvos radijo ir televizijos komisija.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Vilniaus apygardos administracinis teismas.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Freedom to provide services — Directive 2010/13/EU — Audiovisual media services — Television broadcasting — Article 3(1) and (2) — Freedom of reception and retransmission — Incitement to hatred on grounds of nationality — Measures taken by the receiving Member State — Temporary obligation for media service providers and other persons providing services relating to the distribution of television channels or programmes via the internet to distribute or retransmit a television channel in the territory of that Member State only in pay-to-view packages.#Case C-622/17.

cjeu_case · 28 février 2019

63222

Opinion of Advocate General Hogan delivered on 28 February 2019.#Federazione Italiana Golf (FIG) v Istituto Nazionale di Statistica - ISTAT and Ministero dell'Economia e delle Finanze and Federazione Italiana Sport Equestri (FISE) v Istituto Nazionale di Statistica - ISTAT and.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Corte dei Conti.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Regulation (EU) No 549/2013 – European system of national and regional accounts in the European Union – Paragraph 20.15 of Annex A – Control by a National Olympic Committee of national sports federations in the form of non-profit institutions (NPIs) – Second sentence of paragraph 20.15 of Annex A – Definition of ‘public intervention in the form of general regulations applicable to all units working in the same activity’ – Scope – First sentence of paragraph 20.15 of Annex A – Definition of ‘ability to determine the general policy or programme’ of an NPI – Scope – Paragraph 2.39(d), paragraph 20.15(d) and the last sentence of paragraph 20.309(i) of Annex A – Account taken of membership fees paid to the NPI.#Joined Cases C-612/17 and C-613/17.

cjeu_case · 28 février 2019

63223

Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar delivered on 28 February 2019.#European Commission v Federal Republic of Germany.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Services in the internal market — Directive 2006/123/EC — Article 15 — Article 49 TFEU — Freedom of establishment — Fees of architects and engineers for planning services — Minimum and maximum tariffs.#Case C-377/17.

cjeu_case · 28 février 2019

63224

Case C-579/17: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 28 February 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeits- und Sozialgericht Wien — Austria) — BUAK Bauarbeiter-Urlaubs- u. Abfertigungskasse v Gradbeništvo Korana d.o.o. (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 — Article 1(1) — Scope — Civil and commercial matters — Article 1(2) — Matters excluded — Social security — Article 53 — Application for the issue of the certificate certifying that the judgment delivered by the court of origin is enforceable — Judgment relating to a claim for wage supplements regarding annual leave pay that a social security body has against an employer with respect to the posting of workers — Exercise of a judicial function by the court ruling in the case)

cjeu_case · 28 février 2019

63225

Case C-567/17: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 28 February 2019 (Request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas — Lithuania) — ‘Bene Factum’UAB v Valstybinė mokesčių inspekcija prie Lietuvos Respublikos finansų ministerijos (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Tax provisions — Excise duty — Directive 92/83/EEC — Article 27(1)(b) — Exemptions — Definition of ‘products not for human consumption’ — Assessment criteria)

cjeu_case · 28 février 2019

63226

Case C-505/17 P: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 28 February 2019 — Groupe Léa Nature v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), Debonair Trading Internacional Lda (Appeal — EU trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Article 8(1)(b) and Article 8(5) — Figurative mark containing the word elements ‘SO’BiO ētic’ — EU and national word and figurative marks containing the word element ‘SO…?’ — Opposition by the proprietor — Refusal of registration)

cjeu_case · 28 février 2019

63227

Case C-388/17: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 28 February 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen — Sweden) — Konkurrensverket v SJ AB (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Public procurement procedures in the transport sector — Directive 2004/17/EC — Scope — Article 5 — Activities relating to the provision or operation of networks to provide a service to the public in the field of transport by railways — Award, by a public national railway undertaking providing transport services, of cleaning service contracts for trains belonging to that undertaking — No prior publication)

cjeu_case · 28 février 2019

63228

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 28 February 2019.#Souruh SA v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted against Syria — Freezing of funds — Rights of the defence — Right to effective judicial protection — Duty to state reasons — Error of assessment — Right to respect for one’s good name and reputation — Right to property — Presumption of innocence — Proportionality.#Case T-440/16.

cjeu_case · 28 février 2019

63229

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 28 February 2019.#Almashreq Investment Fund v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted against Syria — Freezing of funds — Rights of the defence — Right to effective judicial protection — Duty to state reasons — Error of assessment — Right to respect for one’s good name and reputation — Right to property — Presumption of innocence — Proportionality.#Case T-415/16.

cjeu_case · 28 février 2019

63230

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 28 February 2019.#Drex Technologies SA v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted against Syria — Freezing of funds — Rights of the defence — Right to effective judicial protection — Duty to state reasons — Error of assessment — Right to respect for one’s good name and reputation — Right to property — Presumption of innocence — Proportionality.#Case T-414/16.

cjeu_case · 28 février 2019

63231

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 28 February 2019.#Ateknea Solutions Catalonia, SA v European Commission.#Arbitration clause — Contracts concluded within the sixth framework programme for Research and Technological Development (2002-2006) — Reimbursement of costs incurred by the applicant plus default interest — Eligible costs — Contractual liability.#Case T-69/16.

cjeu_case · 28 février 2019

63232

Case T-440/16: Judgment of the General Court 28 February 2019 — Souruh v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted against Syria — Freezing of funds — Rights of the defence — Right to effective judicial protection — Duty to state reasons — Error of assessment — Right to respect for one’s good name and reputation — Right to property — Presumption of innocence — Proportionality)

cjeu_case · 28 février 2019

63233

Case T-415/16: Judgment of the General Court of 28 February 2019 — Almashreq Investment Fund v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken against Syria — Freezing of funds — Rights of the defence — Right to effective judicial protection — Duty to state reasons — Error of assessment — Right to respect for one’s good name and reputation — Right to property — Presumption of innocence — Proportionality)

cjeu_case · 28 février 2019

63234

Case T-414/16: Judgment of the General Court of 28 February 2019 — Drex Technologies v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted against Syria — Freezing of funds — Rights of the defence — Right to effective judicial protection — Duty to state reasons — Error of assessment — Right to respect for one’s good name and reputation — Right to property — Presumption of innocence — Proportionality)

cjeu_case · 28 février 2019

63235

Case T-69/16: Judgment of the General Court of 28 February 2019 — Ateknea Solutions Catalonia v Commission (Arbitration clause — Contracts concluded within the sixth framework programme for Research and Technological Development (2002-2006) — Reimbursement of costs incurred by the applicant plus default interest — Eligible costs — Contractual liability)

cjeu_case · 28 février 2019

63236

Arrêt de la Cour (troisième chambre) du 28 février 2019.#Conseil de l'Union européenne contre Marquis Energy LLC.#Pourvoi – Dumping – Règlement d’exécution (UE) no 157/2013 – Importations de bioéthanol originaire des États-Unis d’Amérique – Droit antidumping définitif – Marge de dumping établie à l’échelle nationale – Recours en annulation – Producteur non exportateur – Qualité pour agir – Affectation directe.#Affaire C-466/16 P.

cjeu_case · 28 février 2019

63237

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 28 February 2019.#Council of the European Union v Marquis Energy LLC.#Appeal – Dumping – Implementing Regulation (EU) No 157/2013 – Imports of bioethanol originating in the United States of America – Definitive anti-dumping duty – Country-wide dumping margin – Action for annulment – Non-exporting producer – Locus standi – Direct concern.#Case C-466/16 P.

cjeu_case · 28 février 2019

63238

Arrêt de la Cour (troisième chambre) du 28 février 2019.#Conseil de l'Union européenne contre Growth Energy et Renewable Fuels Association.#Pourvoi – Dumping – Règlement d’exécution (UE) no 157/2013 – Importations de bioéthanol originaire des États-Unis d’Amérique – Droit antidumping définitif – Marge de dumping établie à l’échelle nationale – Recours en annulation – Associations représentant des producteurs non exportateurs et des négociants/mélangeurs – Qualité pour agir – Affectation directe – Affectation individuelle.#Affaire C-465/16 P.

cjeu_case · 28 février 2019

63239

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 28 February 2019.#Council of the European Union v Growth Energy and Renewable Fuels Association.#Appeal – Dumping – Implementing Regulation (EU) No 157/2013 – Imports of bioethanol originating in the United States of America – Definitive anti-dumping duty – Country-wide dumping margin – Actions for annulment – Associations representing non-exporting producers and traders/blenders – Locus standi – Direct concern – Individual concern.#Case C-465/16 P.

cjeu_case · 28 février 2019

63240

Case C-466/16 P: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 28 February 2019 — Council of the European Union v Marquis Energy LLC, European Commission, ePURE, de Europese Producenten Unie van Hernieuwbare Ethanol (Appeal — Dumping — Implementing Regulation (EU) No 157/2013 — Imports of bioethanol originating in the United States of America — Definitive anti-dumping duty — Country-wide dumping margin — Actions for annulment — Non-exporting producer — Locus standi — Direct concern)

cjeu_case · 28 février 2019