Documents : Union européenne

Union supranationale de 27 États membres. Les actes officiels (règlements, directives, décisions) sont publiés par l'Office des publications de l'UE (Cellar/EUR-Lex). La jurisprudence de la Cour de justice de l'UE (CJUE) relève également d'un organe de l'UE.

Site officiel ↗

Types de documents
regulation (161375) cjeu_case (104317) decision (43264) directive (8068)
317 024 documents
63201

Opinion of Advocate General Bot delivered on 28 February 2019.#Línea Directa Aseguradora SA v Segurcaixa Sociedad Anónima de Seguros y Reaseguros.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles — Directive 2009/103/EC — Article 3, first paragraph — Concept of ‘use of vehicles’ — Damage to building as a result of a fire in a vehicle parked in the private garage of the building — Compulsory insurance cover.#Case C-100/18.

cjeu_case ·
63202

Case C-278/18: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 28 February 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo — Portugal) — Manuel Jorge Sequeira Mesquita v Fazenda Pública (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Value added tax (VAT) — Sixth Directive 77/388/EEC — Exemption — Article 13B(b) — Leasing or letting of immovable property — Meaning — Contract for the transfer of the use of land comprising vineyards for agricultural purposes)

cjeu_case ·
63203

Case C-14/18 P: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 28 February 2019 — Alfamicro — Sistemas de computadores, Sociedade Unipessoal, Lda. v European Commission (Appeal — Arbitration clause — Article 272 TFEU — Concept of a ‘declaratory action’ — Article 263 TFEU — Concept of an ‘administrative decision’ — Grant agreement concluded under the Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme (CIP) (2007-2013) — Audit reports finding certain declared costs to be ineligible)

cjeu_case ·
63205

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 7 February 2019.#Sumol + Compal Marcas, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark Dr. Jacob’s essentials — Earlier international word mark COMPAL ESSENCIAL — Earlier national and international figurative marks FRUTA essencial and Compal FRUTA essencial — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-656/17.

cjeu_case ·
63206

Arrêt de la Cour (deuxième chambre) du 28 février 2019.#BUAK Bauarbeiter-Urlaubs- u. Abfertigungskasse contre Gradbeništvo Korana d.o.o.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Coopération judiciaire en matière civile – Règlement (UE) no 1215/2012 – Article 1er, paragraphe 1 – Champ d’application – Matière civile et commerciale – Article 1er, paragraphe 2 – Matières exclues – Sécurité sociale – Article 53 – Demande de délivrance du certificat attestant que la décision rendue par la juridiction d’origine est exécutoire – Jugement portant sur une créance constituée de suppléments pour l’indemnité de congés payés détenue par un organisme de sécurité sociale contre un employeur au titre du détachement de travailleurs – Exercice par la juridiction saisie d’une activité juridictionnelle.#Affaire C-579/17.

cjeu_case ·
63207

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 28 February 2019.#BUAK Bauarbeiter-Urlaubs- u. Abfertigungskasse v Gradbeništvo Korana d.o.o.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeits- und Sozialgericht Wien.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 — Article 1(1) — Scope — Civil and commercial matters — Article 1(2) — Matters excluded — Social security — Article 53 — Application for the issue of the certificate certifying that the judgment delivered by the court of origin is enforceable — Judgment relating to a claim for wage supplements regarding annual leave pay that a social security body has against an employer with respect to the posting of workers — Exercise of a judicial function by the court ruling in the case.#Case C-579/17.

cjeu_case ·
63209

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 28 February 2019.#UAB „Bene Factum“ v Valstybinė mokesčių inspekcija prie Lietuvos Respublikos finansų ministerijos.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Tax provisions — Excise duty — Directive 92/83/EEC — Article 27(1)(b) — Exemptions — Definition of ‘products not for human consumption’ — Assessment criteria.#Case C-567/17.

cjeu_case ·
63211

Arrêt de la Cour (neuvième chambre) du 28 février 2019.#Konkurrensverket contre SJ AB.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Procédures de passation des marchés dans les secteurs des transports – Directive 2004/17/CE – Champ d’application – Article 5 – Activités visant la mise à disposition ou l’exploitation de réseaux destinés à fournir un service au public dans le domaine du transport par chemin de fer – Attribution, par une entreprise ferroviaire nationale publique fournissant des services de transports, de contrats de services de nettoyage des trains appartenant à ladite société – Absence de publication préalable.#Affaire C-388/17.

cjeu_case ·
63212

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 28 February 2019.#Konkurrensverket v SJ AB.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Public procurement procedures in the transport sector — Directive 2004/17/EC — Scope — Article 5 — Activities relating to the provision or operation of networks to provide a service to the public in the field of transport by railways — Award, by a public national railway undertaking providing transport services, of cleaning service contracts for trains belonging to that undertaking — No prior publication.#Case C-388/17.

cjeu_case ·
63214

Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 28 February 2019.#Lies Craeynest and Others v Brussels Hoofdstedelijk Gewest and Brussels Instituut voor Milieubeheer.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Nederlandstalige rechtbank van eerste aanleg Brussel.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 2008/50/EC — Articles 6, 7, 13 and 23 — Annex III — Assessment of air quality — Criteria for determining whether the nitrogen dioxide limit values have been exceeded — Measurements using fixed sampling points — Choice of appropriate sites — Interpretation of the values measured at the sampling points — Obligations of the Member States — Judicial review — Intensity of the review — Power to issue directions.#Case C-723/17.

cjeu_case ·
63215

Opinion of Advocate General Saugmandsgaard Øe delivered on 28 February 2019.#ExxonMobil Production Deutschland GmbH v Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Berlin.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Directive 2003/87/EC — Scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading — Natural gas processing installation — Sulphur recovery — ‘Claus process’ — Production of electricity in a secondary facility — Production of heat — Emission of inherent carbon dioxide (CO2) — Article 2(1) — Scope — Annex I — Activity of ‘combustion of fuels’ — Article 3(u) — Concept of ‘electricity generator’ — Article 10a(3) and (4) — Transitional arrangements for the harmonised free allocation of emission allowances — Decision 2011/278/EU — Scope — Article 3(c) — Concept of ‘heat benchmark sub-installation’.#Case C-682/17.

cjeu_case ·
63216

Opinion of Advocate General Sharpston delivered on 28 February 2019.#M. Çoban v Raad van bestuur van het Uitvoeringsinstituut werknemersverzekeringen (Uwv).#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Centrale Raad van Beroep.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — EEC-Turkey Association Agreement — Additional Protocol — Article 59 — Decision No 3/80 — Social security for migrant workers — Waiver of residence clauses — Article 6 — Invalidity benefit — Withdrawal — Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 — Special non-contributory cash benefits — Residence condition — Directive 2003/109/EC — Long-term resident status.#Case C-677/17.

cjeu_case ·
63217

Opinion of Advocate General Bot delivered on 28 February 2019.#WB v Notariusz Przemysława Bac.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Gorzowie Wielkopolskim.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Regulation (EU) No 650/2012 — Article 3(1)(g) and (i) — Definition of a ‘decision’ in a matter of succession — Definition of an ‘authentic instrument’ in a matter of succession — Legal classification of the national deed of certification of succession — Article 3(2) — Definition of a ‘court’ — Failure by the Member State to notify the European Commission of notaries as non-judicial authorities exercising judicial functions like courts.#Case C-658/17.

cjeu_case ·
63218

Opinion of Advocate General Pitruzzella delivered on 28 February 2019.#Bundesverband der Verbraucherzentralen und Verbraucherverbände - Verbraucherzentrale Bundesverband eV v Amazon EU Sàrl.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Consumer protection — Directive 2011/83/EU — Article 6(1)(c) — Information requirements for distance and off‑premises contracts — Obligation, for a trader, to indicate its telephone number and its fax number ‘where they are available’ — Scope.#Case C-649/17.

cjeu_case ·
63219

Opinion of Advocate General Hogan delivered on 28 February 2019.#Proceedings brought by Eurobolt BV.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 267 TFEU — Right to an effective remedy — Extent of review by national courts of an act of the European Union — Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 — Article 15(2) — Communication to the Member States, no later than 10 working days before the meeting of the Advisory Committee, of all relevant information — Concept of ‘relevant information’ — Essential procedural requirement — Implementing Regulation (EU) No 723/2011 — Extension of the anti-dumping duty imposed on imports of certain iron or steel fasteners originating in China to imports consigned from Malaysia — Validity.#Case C-644/17.

cjeu_case ·
63220

Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 28 February 2019.#Criminal proceedings against Tronex BV.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Gerechtshof Den Haag.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Waste — Shipments — Regulation (EC) No 1013/2006 — Article 2(1) — Directive 2008/98/EC — Article 3(1) — Concepts of ‘shipment of waste’ and ‘waste’ — Consignment of goods initially intended for retail sale, returned by consumers or become redundant in the seller’s product range.#Case C-624/17.

cjeu_case ·