Documents : Union européenne

Union supranationale de 27 États membres. Les actes officiels (règlements, directives, décisions) sont publiés par l'Office des publications de l'UE (Cellar/EUR-Lex). La jurisprudence de la Cour de justice de l'UE (CJUE) relève également d'un organe de l'UE.

Site officiel ↗

Types de documents
regulation (161375) cjeu_case (104317) decision (43264) directive (8068)
317 024 documents
62501

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber, Extended Composition) of 28 March 2019.#Robert Bosch GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Applications for the EU figurative marks Simply.Connected. — Absolute ground for refusal — No distinctive character — Scope of the examination to be carried out by the Board of Appeal — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Article 64 of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 71 of Regulation 2017/1001).#Cases T-251/17 and T-252/17.

cjeu_case ·
62502

Case T-829/17: Judgment of the General Court of 28 March 2019 — Coesia v EUIPO (Representation of two oblique red curves) (EU trade mark — Application for an EU figurative mark representing two oblique red curves — Absolute ground for refusal — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Obligation to state reasons — Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 94 of Regulation 2017/1001))

cjeu_case ·
62503

Case T-562/17: Judgment of the General Court of 28 March 2019 — dm-drogerie markt v EUIPO — Albea Services (ALBÉA) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Figurative mark ALBÉA — Earlier international registration designating the European Union — Word mark Balea — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) ofRegulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

cjeu_case ·
62504

Cases T-251/17 and T-252/17: Judgment of the General Court of 28 March 2019 — Robert Bosch v EUIPO (Simply. Connected.) (EU trade mark — Applications for the EU figurative marks Simply. Connected. — Relative ground for refusal — No distinctive character — Scope of the examination which has to be carried out by the Board of Appeal — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Article 64 of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 71 of Regulation 2017/1001))

cjeu_case ·
62505

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 28 March 2019.#Cogeco Communications Inc v Sport TV Portugal SA and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 102 TFEU — Principles of equivalence and effectiveness — Directive 2014/104/EU — Article 9(1) — Article 10(2) to (4) — Articles 21 and 22 — Actions for damages under national law for infringements of the competition law provisions of the Member States and of the European Union — Effects of national decisions — Limitation periods — Transposition — Temporal application.#Case C-637/17.

cjeu_case ·
62506

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 28 March 2019.#Cogeco Communications Inc v Sport TV Portugal SA and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Judicial da Comarca de Lisboa.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 102 TFEU — Principles of equivalence and effectiveness — Directive 2014/104/EU — Article 9(1) — Article 10(2) to (4) — Articles 21 and 22 — Actions for damages under national law for infringements of the competition law provisions of the Member States and of the European Union — Effects of national decisions — Limitation periods — Transposition — Temporal application.#Case C-637/17.

cjeu_case ·
62510

Opinion of Advocate General Sharpston delivered on 28 March 2019.#Sumanan Vethanayagam and Others v Minister van Buitenlandse Zaken.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Den Haag, zittingsplaats Utrecht.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Area of freedom, security and justice — Community Visa code — Regulation (EC) No 810/2009 — Article 5 — Member State competent for examining and deciding on a visa application — Article 8 — Representation arrangement — Article 32(3) — Appeal against a decision to refuse a visa — Member State competent to rule on the appeal where a representation arrangement is in place — Persons entitled to bring an appeal.#Case C-680/17.

cjeu_case ·
62512

Case C-637/17: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 28 March 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Judicial da Comarca de Lisboa — Portugal) — Cogeco Communications Inc. v Sport TV Portugal SA, Controlinveste-SGPS SA, NOS-SGPS SA (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 102 TFEU — Principles of equivalence and effectiveness — Directive 2014/104/EU — Article 9(1) — Article 10(2) to (4) — Articles 21 and 22 — Actions for damages under national law for infringements of the competition law provisions of the Member States and of the European Union — Effects of national decisions — Limitation periods — Transposition — Temporal application)

cjeu_case ·
62515

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber, Extended Composition) of 28 March 2019.#Pometon SpA v European Commission.#Competition – Agreements and concerted practices – European steel abrasives market – Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement – Price coordination throughout the EEA – Chronologically staggered ‘hybrid’ procedure – Presumption of innocence – Principle of impartiality – Charter of Fundamental Rights – Evidence of the infringement – Single and continuous infringement – Restriction of competition by object – Duration of the infringement – Fine – Exceptional adaptation of the basic amount – Obligation to state reasons – Proportionality – Equal treatment – Unlimited jurisdiction.#Case T-433/16.

cjeu_case ·
62516

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber, Extended Composition) of 28 March 2019.#Pometon SpA v European Commission.#Competition – Agreements and concerted practices – European steel abrasives market – Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement – Price coordination throughout the EEA – Chronologically staggered ‘hybrid’ procedure – Presumption of innocence – Principle of impartiality – Charter of Fundamental Rights – Evidence of the infringement – Single and continuous infringement – Restriction of competition by object – Duration of the infringement – Fine – Exceptional adaptation of the basic amount – Obligation to state reasons – Proportionality – Equal treatment – Unlimited jurisdiction.#Case T-433/16.

cjeu_case ·
62517

Case T-433/16: Judgment of the General Court of 28 March 2019 — Pometon v Commission (Competition — Agreements and concerted practices — European steel abrasives market — Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement — Price coordination throughout the EEA — Chronologically staggered ‘hybrid’ procedure — Presumption of innocence — Principle of impartiality — Charter of Fundamental Rights — Evidence of the infringement — Single and continuous infringement — Restriction of competition ‘by object’ — Duration of the infringement — Fine — Exceptional adjustment of the basic amount — Obligation to state reasons — Proportionality — Equal treatment — Unlimited jurisdiction)

cjeu_case ·
62518

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 28 March 2019.#Federal Republic of Germany v European Commission.#Appeal — State aid — Aid granted by certain provisions of the amended German law concerning renewable energy sources (EEG 2012) — Aid supporting renewable electricity and reduced EEG surcharge for energy-intensive users — Decision declaring the aid partially incompatible with the internal market — Concept of State aid — Advantage — State resources — Public control of resources — Measure which can be assimilated to a levy on electricity consumption.#Case C-405/16 P.

cjeu_case ·
62519

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 28 March 2019.#Federal Republic of Germany v European Commission.#Appeal — State aid — Aid granted by certain provisions of the amended German law concerning renewable energy sources (EEG 2012) — Aid supporting renewable electricity and reduced EEG surcharge for energy-intensive users — Decision declaring the aid partially incompatible with the internal market — Concept of State aid — Advantage — State resources — Public control of resources — Measure which can be assimilated to a levy on electricity consumption.#Case C-405/16 P.

cjeu_case ·
62520

Case C-405/16 P: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 28 March 2019 — Federal Republic of Germany v European Commission (Appeal — State aid — Aid granted by certain provisions of the amended German law concerning renewable energy sources (EEG 2012) — Aid supporting renewable electricity and reduced EEG surcharge for energy-intensive users — Decision declaring the aid partially incompatible with the internal market — Concept of State aid — Advantage — State resources — Public control of resources — Measure which can be assimilated to a levy on electricity consumption)

cjeu_case ·