Documents : Union européenne

Union supranationale de 27 États membres. Les actes officiels (règlements, directives, décisions) sont publiés par l'Office des publications de l'UE (Cellar/EUR-Lex). La jurisprudence de la Cour de justice de l'UE (CJUE) relève également d'un organe de l'UE.

Site officiel ↗

Types de documents
regulation (161375) cjeu_case (104317) decision (43264) directive (8068)
317 024 documents
58825

Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 18 September 2019.#Glimarpol sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design — Registered Community design representing pneumatic power tools — Invalidity proceedings — Intervention by the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal — Expiry of the time limit within which to intervene under Article 173 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court — Refusal to grant leave to intervene under that provision — Application, in the alternative, for leave to intervene under Article 143 of the Rules of Procedure made within the time limit — Whether permissible.#Case T-748/18.

cjeu_case ·
58826

Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 18 September 2019.#Glimarpol sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design — Registered Community design representing pneumatic power tools — Invalidity proceedings — Intervention by the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal — Expiry of the time limit within which to intervene under Article 173 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court — Refusal to grant leave to intervene under that provision — Application, in the alternative, for leave to intervene under Article 143 of the Rules of Procedure made within the time limit — Whether permissible.#Case T-748/18.

cjeu_case ·
58828

Arrêt de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 18 septembre 2019.#AQ et DN contre Ministre de l'Action et des Comptes publics.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Fiscalité directe – Directive 90/434/CEE – Directive 2009/133/CE – Article 8 – Plus-values afférentes à des opérations d’échange de titres – Cession de titres reçus lors de l’échange – Plus-value placée en report d’imposition – Imposition des actionnaires – Imposition selon des règles d’assiette et de taux distinctes – Abattements d’assiette tenant compte de la durée de détention des titres.#Affaires jointes C-662/18 et C-672/18.

cjeu_case ·
58829

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 18 September 2019.#AQ and DN v Ministre de l'Action et des Comptes publics.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d'État.#References for a preliminary ruling — Direct taxation — Directive 90/434/EEC — Directive 2009/133/EC — Article 8 — Capital gains relating to exchange of securities transactions — Transfer of securities received at the time of the exchange — Capital gain on which tax has been deferred — Taxation of the shareholders — Taxation on the basis of different bases of assessment and rate rules — Reductions of the basis of assessment taking into account the period for which securities have been held.#Joined Cases C-662/18 and C-672/18.

cjeu_case ·
58830

Arrêt de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 18 septembre 2019.#José Manuel Ortiz Mesonero contre UTE Luz Madrid Centro.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Politique sociale – Directive 2010/18/UE – Accord-cadre révisé sur le congé parental – Réglementation nationale subordonnant l’octroi du congé parental à la réduction du temps de travail, avec une diminution proportionnelle du salaire – Travail posté avec un horaire variable – Demande du travailleur d’effectuer son travail à un horaire fixe pour s’occuper de ses enfants mineurs – Directive 2006/54/CE – Égalité des chances et égalité de traitement entre hommes et femmes en matière d’emploi et de travail – Discrimination indirecte – Irrecevabilité partielle.#Affaire C-366/18.

cjeu_case ·
58831

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 18 September 2019.#José Manuel Ortiz Mesonero v UTE Luz Madrid Centro (integrada por las mercantiles SICE SA, URBALUX SA IMESAPI SA EXTRALUX SA y CITELUM IBÉRICA SA).#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Social n° 33 de Madrid.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2010/18/EU — Revised Framework Agreement on parental leave — National legislation making the granting of parental leave conditional on a reduction in working time, with a proportional reduction in pay — Shift work with variable hours — Request of the worker to perform his work at a fixed schedule to care for his minor children — Directive 2006/54/EC — Equal opportunities and equal treatment of men and women in employment and occupation — Indirect discrimination — Partial inadmissibility.#Case C-366/18.

cjeu_case ·
58832

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 September 2019.#VIPA Kereskedelmi és Szolgáltató Kft. v Országos Gyógyszerészeti és Élelmezés-egészségügyi Intézet.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Cross-border healthcare – Directive 2011/24/EU – Articles 3(k) and 11(1) – Prescription – Definition – Recognition of a prescription issued in another Member State by an authorised person – Conditions – Free movement of goods – Prohibition of measures having equivalent effect to quantitative restrictions on exports – Articles 35 and 36 TFEU – Restriction on the dispensing by a pharmacy of prescription-only medicinal products – Order form issued in another Member State – Justification – Protection of human health and human life – Directive 2001/83/EC – Second paragraph of Article 81 – Supply of medicinal products to the public of a Member State.#Case C-222/18.

cjeu_case ·
58833

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 September 2019.#VIPA Kereskedelmi és Szolgáltató Kft. v Országos Gyógyszerészeti és Élelmezés-egészségügyi Intézet.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Cross-border healthcare – Directive 2011/24/EU – Articles 3(k) and 11(1) – Prescription – Definition – Recognition of a prescription issued in another Member State by an authorised person – Conditions – Free movement of goods – Prohibition of measures having equivalent effect to quantitative restrictions on exports – Articles 35 and 36 TFEU – Restriction on the dispensing by a pharmacy of prescription-only medicinal products – Order form issued in another Member State – Justification – Protection of human health and human life – Directive 2001/83/EC – Second paragraph of Article 81 – Supply of medicinal products to the public of a Member State.#Case C-222/18.

cjeu_case ·
58834

Arrêt de la Cour (première chambre) du 18 septembre 2019.#Skarb Pánstwa Rzeczpospolitej Polskiej – Generalny Dyrektor Dróg Krajowych i Autostrad contre Stephan Riel.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Règlement (UE) no 1215/2012 – Compétence judiciaire en matière civile et commerciale – Champ d’application – Article 1er, paragraphe 2, sous b) – Faillites, concordats et autres procédures analogues – Exclusion – Action visant à faire constater l’existence d’une créance aux fins de son enregistrement dans le cadre d’une procédure d’insolvabilité – Application du règlement (CE) no 1346/2000 – Article 41 – Contenu de la production d’une créance – Procédure principale et procédure secondaire d’insolvabilité – Litispendance et connexité – Application par analogie de l’article 29, paragraphe 1, du règlement no 1215/2012 – Inadmissibilité.#Affaire C-47/18.

cjeu_case ·
58835

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 18 September 2019.#Skarb Pánstwa Rzeczpospolitej Polskiej – Generalny Dyrektor Dróg Krajowych i Autostrad v Stephan Riel, en qualité d’administrateur judiciaire de Alpine Bau GmbH.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Wien.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 — Jurisdiction in civil and commercial matters — Scope — Article 1(2)(b) — Bankruptcy, proceedings relating to the winding-up of insolvent companies or other legal persons, judicial arrangements, compositions and analogous proceedings — Not included — Action for a declaration that a claim exists for the purposes of its registration in insolvency proceedings — Application of Regulation (EC) No 1346/2000 — Article 41 — Content of the lodgement of a claim — Main and secondary insolvency proceedings — Lis pendens and related actions — Application by analogy of Article 29(1) of Regulation No 1215/2012 — Inadmissibility.#Case C-47/18.

cjeu_case ·
58836

Arrêt de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 18 septembre 2019.#Tiroler Gebietskrankenkasse contre Michael Moser.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Sécurité sociale – Travailleurs migrants – Règlement (CE) no 987/2009 – Article 60 – Prestations familiales – Droit au paiement de la différence entre le montant de l’allocation parentale versée dans l’État membre prioritairement compétent et l’allocation de garde d’enfant prévue par l’État membre compétent à titre subsidiaire.#Affaire C-32/18.

cjeu_case ·
58837

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 18 September 2019.#Tiroler Gebietskrankenkasse v Michael Moser.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social security — Migrant workers — Regulation (EC) No 987/2009 — Article 60 — Family benefits — Right to payment of the difference between the parental allowance paid in the Member State having primary competence and the childcare allowance provided by the Member State having secondary competence.#Case C-32/18.

cjeu_case ·
58838

Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 18 September 2019.#Procureur-Generaal bij de Hoge Raad der Nederlanden.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Designs — Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 — Article 90(1) — Provisional and protective measures — Jurisdiction of national courts of first instance — Exclusive jurisdiction of the courts designated in that provision.#Case C-678/18.

cjeu_case ·
58839

Opinion of Advocate General Pitruzzella delivered on 18 September 2019.#AR v Cooper International Spirits LLC and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks — Directive 2008/95/EC — Article 5(1)(b) — First subparagraph of Article 10(1) — Article 12(1) — Revocation of a trade mark for lack of genuine use — Right of the trade mark proprietor to plead infringement of his or her exclusive rights as a result of the use by a third party of an identical or similar sign during the period preceding the date on which the revocation took effect.#Case C-622/18.

cjeu_case ·
58840

Opinion of Advocate General Pikamäe delivered on 18 September 2019.#Exportslachterij J. Gosschalk en Zn. BV and Others v Minister van Landbouw, Natuur en Voedselkwaliteit.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the College van Beroep voor het Bedrijfsleven.#References for a preliminary ruling — Regulation (EC) No 882/2004 — Article 27(1) and (4) — Points 1 and 2 of Annex VI — Official controls on feed and food — Financing — Fees payable in relation to official controls — Calculation — Concept of ‘staff involved in the official controls’ — Inclusion of administrative and support staff — Possibility of charging for quarter-hour periods requested by the slaughterhouse for the purposes of official controls but not worked — Conditions.#Joined Cases C-477/18 and C-478/18.

cjeu_case ·