Documents : Union européenne

Union supranationale de 27 États membres. Les actes officiels (règlements, directives, décisions) sont publiés par l'Office des publications de l'UE (Cellar/EUR-Lex). La jurisprudence de la Cour de justice de l'UE (CJUE) relève également d'un organe de l'UE.

Site officiel ↗

Types de documents
regulation (161375) cjeu_case (104317) decision (43264) directive (8068)
317 024 documents
56763

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 5 December 2019.#Idea Groupe v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark Idealogistic Verhoeven Greatest care in getting it there — Earlier national word marks idéa logistique, IDEA and groupe idea — Earlier national figurative mark iDÉA — International registrations designating the European Union — Earlier figurative mark iDÉA and earlier word mark IDEA — Relative grounds for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Use of a sign in the course of trade of more than mere local significance — Article 8(4) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-29/19.

cjeu_case ·
56764

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 5 December 2019.#Idea Groupe v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark Idealogistic Verhoeven Greatest care in getting it there — Earlier national word marks idéa logistique, IDEA and groupe idea — Earlier national figurative mark iDÉA — International registrations designating the European Union — Earlier figurative mark iDÉA and earlier word mark IDEA — Relative grounds for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Use of a sign in the course of trade of more than mere local significance — Article 8(4) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-29/19.

cjeu_case ·
56765

Case T-29/19: Judgment of the General Court of 5 December 2019 — Idea Groupe v EUIPO — The Logistical Approach (Idealogistic Verhoeven Greatest care in getting it there) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark Idealogistic Verhoeven Greatest care in getting it there — Earlier national word marks idéa logistique, IDEA and groupe idea — Earlier national figurative mark iDÉA — International registrations designating the European Union — Earlier figurative mark iDÉA and earlier word mark IDEA — Relative grounds for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Use of a sign in the course of trade of more than mere local significance — Article 8(4) of Regulation 2017/1001)

cjeu_case ·
56766

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may succeed) of 5 December 2019.#Agencja Wydawnicza Technopol sp. z o. o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal — EU trade mark — Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed — Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Request not raising an issue that is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law — Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-664/19 P.

cjeu_case ·
56767

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may succeed) of 5 December 2019.#Agencja Wydawnicza Technopol sp. z o. o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal — EU trade mark — Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed — Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Request not raising an issue that is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law — Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-664/19 P.

cjeu_case ·
56770

Arrêt de la Cour (première chambre) du 5 décembre 2019.#Procédure engagée par Centraal Justitieel Incassobureau, Ministerie van Veiligheid en Justitie (CJIB).#Renvoi préjudiciel – Espace de liberté, de sécurité et de justice – Coopération judiciaire en matière pénale – Reconnaissance mutuelle – Sanctions pécuniaires – Motifs de non-reconnaissance et de non-exécution – Décision-cadre 2005/214/JAI – Décision d’une autorité de l’État membre d’émission sur la base de données relatives à l’immatriculation d’un véhicule – Prise de connaissance des sanctions et des modalités d’appel par l’intéressé – Droit à une protection juridictionnelle effective.#Affaire C-671/18.

cjeu_case ·
56771

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 5 December 2019.#Proceedings brought by Centraal Justitieel Incassobureau, Ministerie van Veiligheid en Justitie (CJIB).#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy w Chełmnie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Area of freedom, security and justice — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Mutual recognition — Financial penalties — Grounds for non-recognition and non-execution — Framework Decision 2005/214/JHA — Decision by an authority of the issuing Member State based on vehicle registration data — Notification of the penalties and the appeal procedures to the person concerned — Right to effective judicial protection.#Case C-671/18.

cjeu_case ·
56772

Arrêt de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 5 décembre 2019.#Commission européenne contre Royaume d'Espagne.#Manquement d’État – Directive 2008/98/CE – Articles 30 et 33 – Plans de gestion des déchets – Communautés autonomes des îles Baléares et des îles Canaries (Espagne) – Obligation de révision – Obligation de notification à la Commission – Défaut de mise en demeure régulière – Envoi de la mise en demeure de manière prématurée – Irrecevabilité.#Affaire C-642/18.

cjeu_case ·
56773

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 5 December 2019.#European Commission v Kingdom of Spain.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Directive 2008/98/EC — Articles 30 and 33 — Waste management plans — Autonomous Communities of the Balearic Islands and the Canary Islands (Spain) — Obligation to revise — Obligation to notify the Commission — No proper formal notice — Letter of formal notice sent prematurely — Inadmissibility.#Case C-642/18.

cjeu_case ·
56774

Arrêt de la Cour (première chambre) du 5 décembre 2019.#Ordre des avocats du barreau de Dinant contre JN.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Coopération judiciaire en matière civile – Règlement (UE) no 1215/2012 – Compétence judiciaire, reconnaissance et exécution des décisions en matière civile et commerciale – Article 7, point 1, sous a) – Compétence spéciale en matière contractuelle – Notion de “matière contractuelle” – Demande de paiement des cotisations annuelles dues par un avocat à un ordre des avocats.#Affaire C-421/18.

cjeu_case ·
56775

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 5 December 2019.#Ordre des avocats du barreau de Dinant v JN.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de première instance de Namur.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 — Jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters — Article 7(1)(a) — Special jurisdiction in matters relating to a contract — Concept of ‘matters relating to a contract’ — Claim for payment of annual fees payable by a lawyer to a bar association.#Case C-421/18.

cjeu_case ·
56776

Arrêt de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 5 décembre 2019.#Antonio Bocero Torrico et Jörg Paul Konrad Fritz Bode contre Instituto Nacional de la Seguridad Social et Tesorería General de la Seguridad Social.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Sécurité sociale des travailleurs migrants – Règlement (CE) no 883/2004 – Pension de retraite anticipée – Éligibilité – Montant de la pension à percevoir devant excéder le montant minimum légal – Prise en compte uniquement de la pension acquise dans l’État membre concerné – Absence de prise en compte de la pension de retraite acquise dans un autre État membre – Différence de traitement pour les travailleurs ayant exercé leur droit à la libre circulation.#Affaires jointes C-398/18 et C-428/18.

cjeu_case ·
56777

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 5 December 2019.#Antonio Bocero Torrico and Jörg Paul Konrad Fritz Bode v Instituto Nacional de la Seguridad Social and Tesorería General de la Seguridad Social.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Galicia.#References for a preliminary ruling — Social security for migrant workers — Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 — Early retirement pension — Eligibility — Requirement for the pension to be received to be higher than the statutory minimum — Account taken only of pension acquired in the Member State concerned — No account taken of the retirement pension acquired in another Member State — Difference in treatment of workers who have exercised their right to freedom of movement.#Joined Cases C-398/18 and C-428/18.

cjeu_case ·
56778

Opinion of Advocate General Bobek delivered on 5 December 2019.#LH v Bevándorlási és Menekültügyi Hivatal.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Asylum policy – Common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection – Directive 2013/32/EU – Application for international protection – Article 33(2) – Grounds of inadmissibility – National legislation under which an application is inadmissible if the applicant has arrived in the Member State concerned via a country in which he or she is not exposed to persecution or the risk of serious harm, or if that country provides sufficient protection – Article 46 – Right to an effective remedy – Judicial review of administrative decisions concerning the inadmissibility of applications for international protection – Time limit of eight days within which to give a decision – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.#Case C-564/18.

cjeu_case ·
56779

Opinion of Advocate General Pitruzzella delivered on 5 December 2019.#Izba Gospodarcza Producentów i Operatorów Urządzeń Rozrywkowych v European Commission.#Appeal — Access to documents of the institutions — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Article 4(2), third indent — Exceptions to the right of access — Exception relating to protection of the purpose of investigations — Documents concerning pending infringement proceedings — Detailed opinions issued in the course of a notification procedure under Directive 98/34/EC — Request for access — Refusal — Disclosure of documents requested in the course of the proceedings before the General Court of the European Union — Disclosure — Inadmissibility — Interest in bringing proceedings — Continuation.#Case C-560/18 P.

cjeu_case ·
56780

Opinion of Advocate General Bobek delivered on 5 December 2019.#PG v Bevándorlási és Menekültügyi Hivatal.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common policy on asylum and subsidiary protection — Common procedures for granting international protection — Directive 2013/32/EU — Article 46(3) — Full and ex nunc examination — Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Right to an effective remedy — Powers and obligations of the first-instance court or tribunal — No power to vary the decisions of the authorities competent in the area of international protection — National legislation providing for an obligation to adjudicate within a time limit of 60 days.#Case C-406/18.

cjeu_case ·