Documents : Union européenne

Union supranationale de 27 États membres. Les actes officiels (règlements, directives, décisions) sont publiés par l'Office des publications de l'UE (Cellar/EUR-Lex). La jurisprudence de la Cour de justice de l'UE (CJUE) relève également d'un organe de l'UE.

Site officiel ↗

Types de documents
regulation (161354) cjeu_case (104315) decision (43245) directive (8067)
316 981 documents
50084

Case T-857/19: Judgment of the General Court of 28 October 2020 — Dehousse v Court of Justice of the European Union (Access to documents — Court of Justice of the European Union — Documents held by an institution in the exercise of its administrative functions — Article 266 TFEU — Decision adopted to give effect to a judgment of the General Court — Measures necessary to give effect to a judgment delivered in an action for annulment — Presumption of non-existence or non-possession of documents — Plausible explanations making it possible to determine the reasons for the non-existence or non-possession of documents — Obligation to state reasons — Retention of documentation — Principle of good administration)

cjeu_case ·
50087

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 28 October 2020.#ZA and Others v Repsol Comercial de Productos Petrolíferos SA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Competition – Final decision of a national competition authority finding a practice restricting competition – Scope of the probative value of the facts examined and found – Lack of sufficient details concerning the factual and regulatory context of the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need to reply to the questions referred for a preliminary ruling – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-716/19.

cjeu_case ·
50088

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 28 October 2020.#ZA and Others v Repsol Comercial de Productos Petrolíferos SA.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Mercantil n° 2 de Madrid.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Competition – Final decision of a national competition authority finding a practice restricting competition – Scope of the probative value of the facts examined and found – Lack of sufficient details concerning the factual and regulatory context of the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need to reply to the questions referred for a preliminary ruling – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-716/19.

cjeu_case ·
50089

Arrêt de la Cour (cinquième chambre) du 28 octobre 2020.#BY contre CX.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Droit d’auteur et droits voisins – Directive 2001/29/CE – Société de l’information – Harmonisation de certains aspects du droit d’auteur et des droits voisins – Article 3, paragraphe 1 – Communication au public – Notion de “public” – Transmission par voie électronique à une juridiction d’une œuvre protégée, en tant qu’élément de preuve dans le cadre d’une procédure juridictionnelle.#Affaire C-637/19.

cjeu_case ·
50090

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 28 October 2020.#BY v CX.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Svea Hovrätt – Patent- och marknadsöverdomstolen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Copyright and related rights – Directive 2001/29/EC – Information society – Harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights – Article 3(1) – Communication to the public – Notion of ‘public’ – Transmission by electronic means to a court of a protected work as evidence in court proceedings.#Case C-637/19.

cjeu_case ·
50091

Arrêt de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 28 octobre 2020.#Istituto nazionale per l’assicurazione contro gli infortuni sul lavoro (INAIL) contre Zennaro Giuseppe Legnami Sas di Zennaro Mauro & C.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Aides d’État – Règlement (UE) no 1407/2013 – Article 3 – Aide de minimis – Article 6 – Contrôle – Entreprises dépassant le plafond de minimis en raison du cumul avec des aides obtenues antérieurement – Possibilité de choisir entre la réduction ou la renonciation à une aide précédente afin de respecter le plafond de minimis.#Affaire C-608/19.

cjeu_case ·
50092

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 28 October 2020.#Istituto nazionale per l'assicurazione contro gli infortuni sul lavoro (INAIL) v Zennaro Giuseppe Legnami Sas di Zennaro Mauro & C.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – State aid – Regulation (EU) No 1407/2013 – Article 3 – De minimis aid – Article 6 – Monitoring – Undertakings exceeding the de minimis ceiling because of cumulation with aid obtained previously – Option of choosing between reduction and forgoing previous aid so as to comply with the de minimis ceiling.#Case C-608/19.

cjeu_case ·
50093

Arrêt de la Cour (première chambre) du 28 octobre 2020.#BY et CZ contre Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Directive 1999/62/CE – Directive 2006/38/CE – Taxation des poids lourds pour l’utilisation de certaines infrastructures – Article 7, paragraphe 9 – Article 7 bis, paragraphes 1 et 2 – Péages – Principe de recouvrement des coûts d’infrastructure – Coûts d’infrastructure – Coûts d’exploitation – Coûts liés à la police de la route – Dépassement des coûts – Effet direct – Justification a posteriori d’un taux de péage excessif – Limitation des effets de l’arrêt dans le temps.#Affaire C-321/19.

cjeu_case ·
50094

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 28 October 2020.#BY and CZ v Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberverwaltungsgericht für das Land Nordrhein-Westfalen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 1999/62/EC – Directive 2006/38/EC – Charging of heavy goods vehicles for the use of certain infrastructures – Article 7(9) – Article 7a(1) and (2) – Tolls – Principle of the recovery of infrastructure costs – Infrastructure costs – Operating costs – Costs related to traffic police – Cost overrun – Direct effect – Ex post justification of an excessive toll rate – Limitation of the temporal effects of the judgment.#Case C-321/19.

cjeu_case ·
50095

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 28 October 2020.#Associazione Nazionale GranoSalus - Liberi Cerealicoltori & Consumatori (Associazione GranoSalus) v European Commission.#Appeal – Placing of plant protection products on the market – Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 – Renewal of the approval of the active substance glyphosate – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/2324 – Action for annulment brought by an association – Admissibility – Article 263, fourth paragraph, TFEU – Regulatory act not entailing implementing measures – Person directly concerned.#Case C-313/19 P.

cjeu_case ·
50096

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 28 October 2020.#Associazione Nazionale GranoSalus - Liberi Cerealicoltori & Consumatori (Associazione GranoSalus) v European Commission.#Appeal – Placing of plant protection products on the market – Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 – Renewal of the approval of the active substance glyphosate – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/2324 – Action for annulment brought by an association – Admissibility – Article 263, fourth paragraph, TFEU – Regulatory act not entailing implementing measures – Person directly concerned.#Case C-313/19 P.

cjeu_case ·
50097

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 28 October 2020.#Marvin M. v Kreis Heinsberg.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2006/126/EC – Article 2(1) and Article 11(4) – Driving licences – Mutual recognition – Scope of the obligation of recognition – Driving licence which was the subject of an exchange – Exchange at a time when the right to drive had been withdrawn by the issuing Member State – Fraud – Refusal to recognise the licence issued in the context of the exchange.#Case C-112/19.

cjeu_case ·
50098

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 28 October 2020.#Marvin M. v Kreis Heinsberg.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Aachen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2006/126/EC – Article 2(1) and Article 11(4) – Driving licences – Mutual recognition – Scope of the obligation of recognition – Driving licence which was the subject of an exchange – Exchange at a time when the right to drive had been withdrawn by the issuing Member State – Fraud – Refusal to recognise the licence issued in the context of the exchange.#Case C-112/19.

cjeu_case ·
50099

Case C-716/19: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 28 October 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Mercantil No 2 de Madrid — Spain) — ZA, AZ, BX, CV, DU, ET v Repsol Comercial de Productos Petolíferos SA (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Competition — Final decision of a national competition authority finding a practice restrictive of competition — Scope of the probative value of the facts examined and established — Lack of sufficient details concerning the factual and regulatory context of the dispute in the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need to reply to the questions referred for a preliminary ruling — Manifest inadmissibility)

cjeu_case ·
50100

Case C-637/19: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 28 October 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Svea hovrätt — Patent- och marknadsöverdomstolen — Sweden) — BY v CX (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Copyright and related rights — Directive 2001/29/EC — Information society — Harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights — Article 3(1) — Communication to the public — Notion of ‘public’ — Transmission by electronic means to a court of a protected work as evidence in court proceedings)

cjeu_case ·