Documents : Union européenne

Union supranationale de 27 États membres. Les actes officiels (règlements, directives, décisions) sont publiés par l'Office des publications de l'UE (Cellar/EUR-Lex). La jurisprudence de la Cour de justice de l'UE (CJUE) relève également d'un organe de l'UE.

Site officiel ↗

Types de documents
regulation (161354) cjeu_case (104315) decision (43245) directive (8067)
316 981 documents
49121

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 9 December 2020.#Ace of spades Holdings LLC v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the three-dimensional EU trade mark JC JEAN CALL Champagne GRANDE RÉSERVE – Earlier three-dimensional EU trade marks – Relative grounds for refusal – Similarity of the signs – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – No damage to reputation – Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-621/19.

cjeu_case ·
49122

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 9 December 2020.#Ace of spades Holdings LLC v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the three-dimensional EU trade mark JC JEAN CALL Champagne GRANDE RÉSERVE – Earlier three-dimensional EU trade marks – Relative grounds for refusal – Similarity of the signs – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – No damage to reputation – Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-621/19.

cjeu_case ·
49123

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 9 December 2020.#Ace of spades Holdings LLC v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the three-dimensional EU trade mark JC JEAN CALL Champagne ROSÉ – Earlier three-dimensional EU trade marks – Relative grounds for refusal – Similarity of the signs – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – No damage to reputation – Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-620/19.

cjeu_case ·
49124

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 9 December 2020.#Ace of spades Holdings LLC v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the three-dimensional EU trade mark JC JEAN CALL Champagne ROSÉ – Earlier three-dimensional EU trade marks – Relative grounds for refusal – Similarity of the signs – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – No damage to reputation – Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-620/19.

cjeu_case ·
49126

Case T-819/19: Judgment of the General Court of 9 December 2020 — Man and Machine v EUIPO — Bim Freelance (bim ready) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Figurative mark bim ready — Earlier EU figurative mark BIM freelance — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Restriction of the services covered by the mark applied for)

cjeu_case ·
49128

Case T-622/19: Judgment of the General Court of 9 December 2020 — Ace of spades v EUIPO — Krupp and Borrmann (JC JEAN CALL Champagne PRESTIGE) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the three-dimensional EU trade mark JC JEAN CALL Champagne PRESTIGE — Earlier three-dimensional EU trade marks — Relative grounds for refusal — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — No damage to reputation — Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001))

cjeu_case ·
49129

Case T-621/19: Judgment of the General Court of 9 December 2020 — Ace of spades v EUIPO — Krupp and Borrmann (JC JEAN CALL Champagne GRANDE RÉSERVE) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the three-dimensional EU trade mark JC JEAN CALL Champagne GRANDE RÉSERVE — Earlier three-dimensional EU trade marks — Relative grounds for refusal — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — No damage to reputation — Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001))

cjeu_case ·
49130

Case T-620/19: Judgment of the General Court of 9 December 2020 — Ace of spades v EUIPO — Krupp and Borrmann (JC JEAN CALL Champagne ROSÉ) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the three-dimensional EU trade mark JC JEAN CALL Champagne ROSÉ — Earlier three-dimensional EU trade marks — Relative grounds for refusal — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — No damage to reputation — Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001))

cjeu_case ·
49131

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 9 December 2020.#Groupe Canal + v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Television distribution – Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 – Article 9 and Article 16(1) – Decision making commitments binding – Absolute territorial protection – Misuse of powers – Preliminary assessment – No obligation on the European Commission to take account of considerations relating to the application of Article 101(3) TFEU – Agreements intended to partition national markets – No obligation on the Commission to analyse the relevant national markets one by one – Proportionality – Adverse effect on the contractual rights of third parties.#Case C-132/19 P.

cjeu_case ·
49132

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 9 December 2020.#Groupe Canal + v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Television distribution – Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 – Article 9 and Article 16(1) – Decision making commitments binding – Absolute territorial protection – Misuse of powers – Preliminary assessment – No obligation on the European Commission to take account of considerations relating to the application of Article 101(3) TFEU – Agreements intended to partition national markets – No obligation on the Commission to analyse the relevant national markets one by one – Proportionality – Adverse effect on the contractual rights of third parties.#Case C-132/19 P.

cjeu_case ·
49133

Opinion of Advocate General Richard de la Tour delivered on 9 December 2020.#Natumi GmbH v Land Nordrhein-Westfalen.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Agriculture and fisheries – Organic production and labelling of organic products – Regulation (EC) No 834/2007 – Article 19(2) – Articles 21 and 23 – Regulation (EC) No 889/2008 – Article 27(1) – Article 28 – Annex IX, point 1.3 – Processing of organic food – Non-organic ingredients of agricultural origin – Lithothamnium calcareum alga – Powder obtained by cleaning, grinding and drying the sediment of that alga – Classification – Use in organic foodstuffs for the purpose of calcium enrichment – Authorisation – Conditions.#Case C-815/19.

cjeu_case ·
49134

Case C-132/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 9 December 2020 — Groupe Canal + v European Commission, French Republic, Union des producteurs de cinéma (UPC), C More Entertainment AB, European Film Agency Directors — EFAD’s, European Consumer Organisation (BEUC) (Appeal — Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Television distribution — Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 — Article 9 and Article 16(1) — Decision making commitments binding — Absolute territorial protection — Misuse of powers — Preliminary assessment — No obligation on the European Commission to take account of considerations relating to the application of Article 101(3) TFEU — Agreements intended to partition national markets — No obligation on the Commission to analyse the relevant national markets one by one — Proportionality — Adverse effect on the contractual rights of third parties)

cjeu_case ·
49135

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 9 December 2020.#Repsol, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark BASIC – Earlier national trade names basic and basic AG – Relative grounds for refusal – Use in the course of trade of a sign of more than mere local significance – Article 8(4) and Article 53(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(4) and Article 60(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Declaration of partial invalidity – Decision taken following the annulment of an earlier decision by the General Court – Referral of the case back to a Board of Appeal – Lack of competence of the authority referring the case – Article 1(d) of Regulation (EC) No 216/96 – Cross-claim.#Case T-722/18.

cjeu_case ·
49136

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 9 December 2020.#Repsol, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark BASIC – Earlier national trade names basic and basic AG – Relative grounds for refusal – Use in the course of trade of a sign of more than mere local significance – Article 8(4) and Article 53(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(4) and Article 60(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Declaration of partial invalidity – Decision taken following the annulment of an earlier decision by the General Court – Referral of the case back to a Board of Appeal – Lack of competence of the authority referring the case – Article 1(d) of Regulation (EC) No 216/96 – Cross-claim.#Case T-722/18.

cjeu_case ·
49137

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 9 December 2020.#Adraces - Associação para o Desenvolvimento da Raia Centro-Sul v European Commission.#Arbitration clause – Framework partnership agreement – Local Europe Direct information centre – Termination of the contract without specifying the ground – Legal certainty – Principle of good faith – Proportionality – Observance of the contracting party’s rights and legitimate interests – Right to sound administration.#Case T-714/18.

cjeu_case ·
49138

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 9 December 2020.#Adraces - Associação para o Desenvolvimento da Raia Centro-Sul v European Commission.#Arbitration clause – Framework partnership agreement – Local Europe Direct information centre – Termination of the contract without specifying the ground – Legal certainty – Principle of good faith – Proportionality – Observance of the contracting party’s rights and legitimate interests – Right to sound administration.#Case T-714/18.

cjeu_case ·
49139

Case T-722/18: Judgment of the General Court of 9 December 2020 — Repsol v EUIPO — Basic (BASIC) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU figurative mark BASIC — Earlier national trade names basic and basic AG — Relative grounds for refusal — Use in the course of trade of a sign of more than mere local significance — Article 8(4) and Article 53(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(4) and Article 60(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Declaration of partial invalidity — Decision taken following the annulment of an earlier decision by the General Court — Referral of the case back to a Board of Appeal — Lack of competence of the authority referring the case — Article 1(d) of Regulation (EC) No 216/96 — Cross-claim)

cjeu_case ·