Documents : Union européenne

Union supranationale de 27 États membres. Les actes officiels (règlements, directives, décisions) sont publiés par l'Office des publications de l'UE (Cellar/EUR-Lex). La jurisprudence de la Cour de justice de l'UE (CJUE) relève également d'un organe de l'UE.

Site officiel ↗

Types de documents
regulation (161354) cjeu_case (104315) decision (43245) directive (8067)
316 981 documents
48187

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 20 January 2021.#A and M v Bezirkshauptmannschaft Kirchdorf.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Article 267 TFEU – Concept of a ‘court or tribunal’ – Primacy of EU law – Factual and legal context of the dispute in the main proceedings – Reasons justifying the need for an answer to the question referred for a preliminary ruling – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-293/20.

cjeu_case ·
48188

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 20 January 2021.#A and M v Bezirkshauptmannschaft Kirchdorf.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesverwaltungsgericht Oberösterreich.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Article 267 TFEU – Concept of a ‘court or tribunal’ – Primacy of EU law – Factual and legal context of the dispute in the main proceedings – Reasons justifying the need for an answer to the question referred for a preliminary ruling – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-293/20.

cjeu_case ·
48189

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 20 January 2021.#ZU v European External Action Service (EEAS).#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Civil service – Officials – Sick leave – Failure to attend a medical examination – Opinion of the medical service – Amendments made in the Human Resource Management information system – Acts not amenable to review – Decision on the classification of the absence following the failure to attend – Absence deducted from annual leave – Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.#Case C-266/20 P.

cjeu_case ·
48190

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 20 January 2021.#ZU v European External Action Service (EEAS).#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Civil service – Officials – Sick leave – Failure to attend a medical examination – Opinion of the medical service – Amendments made in the Human Resource Management information system – Acts not amenable to review – Decision on the classification of the absence following the failure to attend – Absence deducted from annual leave – Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.#Case C-266/20 P.

cjeu_case ·
48193

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 20 January 2021.#Marc Folschette and Others v European Commission.#Non-contractual liability – Investigation by OLAF – Information technology contract – Corruption – Trading in influence – Final report recommending the bringing of criminal proceedings – Final acquittal by a criminal court – Period of limitation – Sufficiently serious infringement of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals.#Case T-884/19.

cjeu_case ·
48194

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 20 January 2021.#Marc Folschette and Others v European Commission.#Non-contractual liability – Investigation by OLAF – Information technology contract – Corruption – Trading in influence – Final report recommending the bringing of criminal proceedings – Final acquittal by a criminal court – Period of limitation – Sufficiently serious infringement of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals.#Case T-884/19.

cjeu_case ·
48195

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 20 January 2021.#Apologistics GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark discount-ap*theke.de – Earlier EU word marks APODISCOUNTER and APO and earlier figurative marks apo-discounter.de, apo.co and apo.de – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-844/19.

cjeu_case ·
48196

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 20 January 2021.#Apologistics GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark discount-ap*theke.de – Earlier EU word marks APODISCOUNTER and APO and earlier figurative marks apo-discounter.de, apo.co and apo.de – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-844/19.

cjeu_case ·
48197

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 20 January 2021.#Palírna U Zeleného stromu a.s. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark BLEND 42 FIRST CZECH BLENDED VODKA – Earlier EU word mark and international figurative mark 42 BELOW – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Relevant public – Similarity of the goods and services – Similarity of the signs – Global assessment of the likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-831/19.

cjeu_case ·
48198

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 20 January 2021.#Palírna U Zeleného stromu a.s. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark BLEND 42 FIRST CZECH BLENDED VODKA – Earlier EU word mark and international figurative mark 42 BELOW – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Relevant public – Similarity of the goods and services – Similarity of the signs – Global assessment of the likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-831/19.

cjeu_case ·
48199

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 20 January 2021.#Palírna U Zeleného stromu a.s. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark BLEND 42 VODKA – Earlier EU word mark and international figurative mark 42 BELOW – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Relevant public – Similarity of the goods and services – Similarity of the signs – Global assessment of the likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-830/19.

cjeu_case ·
48200

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 20 January 2021.#Palírna U Zeleného stromu a.s. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark BLEND 42 VODKA – Earlier EU word mark and international figurative mark 42 BELOW – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Relevant public – Similarity of the goods and services – Similarity of the signs – Global assessment of the likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-830/19.

cjeu_case ·