Documents : Union européenne

Union supranationale de 27 États membres. Les actes officiels (règlements, directives, décisions) sont publiés par l'Office des publications de l'UE (Cellar/EUR-Lex). La jurisprudence de la Cour de justice de l'UE (CJUE) relève également d'un organe de l'UE.

Site officiel ↗

Types de documents
regulation (161293) cjeu_case (104314) decision (43164) directive (8067)
316 838 documents
4801

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#SIA „EUROPARK LATVIA” and SKIDATA GmbH v Valsts ieņēmumu dienests.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Industrial policy – Information procedure in the field of technical standards and regulations and of rules on Information Society services – Directive (EU) 2015/1535 – Concept of ‘technical regulation’ – National rule requiring the provision of the source code of software registered in the database of the tax authority to a body responsible for assessing the conformity of fiscal technical requirements – Article 34 TFEU – Measure having equivalent effect to a quantitative restriction on imports – Principle of proportionality.#Case C-353/24.

cjeu_case ·
4802

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#SIA „EUROPARK LATVIA” and SKIDATA GmbH v Valsts ieņēmumu dienests.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administratīvā rajona tiesa.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Industrial policy – Information procedure in the field of technical standards and regulations and of rules on Information Society services – Directive (EU) 2015/1535 – Concept of ‘technical regulation’ – National rule requiring the provision of the source code of software registered in the database of the tax authority to a body responsible for assessing the conformity of fiscal technical requirements – Article 34 TFEU – Measure having equivalent effect to a quantitative restriction on imports – Principle of proportionality.#Case C-353/24.

cjeu_case ·
4803

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Autorità per le Garanzie nelle Comunicazioni (AGCOM) v BRT SpA and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Postal parcel delivery services provided to the public – Directive 97/67/EC – Articles 22 and 22a – Regulation (EU) 2018/644 – Article 4 – Decision of the national regulatory authority imposing on parcel delivery service providers obligations to provide information – Legal basis for the competence of that authority to impose specific obligations to provide information on operators not carrying out cross-border parcel delivery – Proportionality.#Case C-345/24.

cjeu_case ·
4804

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Autorità per le Garanzie nelle Comunicazioni (AGCOM) v BRT SpA and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Postal parcel delivery services provided to the public – Directive 97/67/EC – Articles 22 and 22a – Regulation (EU) 2018/644 – Article 4 – Decision of the national regulatory authority imposing on parcel delivery service providers obligations to provide information – Legal basis for the competence of that authority to impose specific obligations to provide information on operators not carrying out cross-border parcel delivery – Proportionality.#Case C-345/24.

cjeu_case ·
4805

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#HG v Procura della Repubblica presso il Tribunale di Firenze.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Directive 2014/41/EU – European Investigation Order in criminal matters – Article 3 – Material scope – Concept of ‘investigative measure’ – Purpose – Obtaining evidence – Article 10 – Recourse to a different type of investigative measure – Article 11 – Grounds for non-recognition or non-execution – Fundamental rights – Article 22 – Temporary transfer to the issuing State of the person held in custody for the purpose of carrying out an investigative measure – Article 24 – Hearing of the accused person by videoconference – Article 24(2)(b) – Fundamental principles of the law of the executing Member State.#Case C-325/24.

cjeu_case ·
4806

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Criminal proceedings v HG.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale ordinario di Firenze.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Directive 2014/41/EU – European Investigation Order in criminal matters – Article 3 – Material scope – Concept of ‘investigative measure’ – Purpose – Obtaining evidence – Article 10 – Recourse to a different type of investigative measure – Article 11 – Grounds for non-recognition or non-execution – Fundamental rights – Article 22 – Temporary transfer to the issuing State of the person held in custody for the purpose of carrying out an investigative measure – Article 24 – Hearing of the accused person by videoconference – Article 24(2)(b) – Fundamental principles of the law of the executing Member State.#Case C-325/24.

cjeu_case ·
4807

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Deity Shoes, S.L. v Mundorama Confort, S.L. and Stay Design, S.L.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Intellectual property – Community designs – Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Articles 4 to 6 and 14 – Conditions for the protection of a design – Novelty – Individual character – Visual characteristics predetermined by a third party – Freedom of the designer in developing the design – Concept of ‘informed user’ – Influence of features linked to fashion trends.#Case C-323/24.

cjeu_case ·
4808

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Deity Shoes, S.L. v Mundorama Confort, S.L. and Stay Design, S.L.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Mercantil de Alicante.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Intellectual property – Community designs – Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Articles 4 to 6 and 14 – Conditions for the protection of a design – Novelty – Individual character – Visual characteristics predetermined by a third party – Freedom of the designer in developing the design – Concept of ‘informed user’ – Influence of features linked to fashion trends.#Case C-323/24.

cjeu_case ·
4809

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#CR and TP v Soledil Srl, sous concordat préventif.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Directive 93/13/EEC – Article 6(1) and Article 7(1) – Power of review and obligations of the national court – Penalty clause – No review of the court’s own motion of whether that term is unfair – Res judicata – Principle of effectiveness – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Reliance on the unfairness of a contractual term before a court to which the case has been remitted following cassation.#Case C-320/24.

cjeu_case ·
4810

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#CR and TP v Soledil Srl, sous concordat préventif.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Directive 93/13/EEC – Article 6(1) and Article 7(1) – Power of review and obligations of the national court – Penalty clause – No review of the court’s own motion of whether that term is unfair – Res judicata – Principle of effectiveness – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Reliance on the unfairness of a contractual term before a court to which the case has been remitted following cassation.#Case C-320/24.

cjeu_case ·
4811

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Pesticide Action Network Europe (PAN Europe) v European Commission.#Appeal – Agriculture – Plant protection products – Article 4 – Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/2049 – Renewal of the approval of the active substance ‘cypermethrin’ – Request for internal review – Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 – Article 10(1) – Decision refusing the request – Risk assessment and risk management – Identification of critical areas of concern – Realistic conditions of use – Precautionary principle.#Case C-316/24 P.

cjeu_case ·
4812

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Pesticide Action Network Europe (PAN Europe) v European Commission.#Appeal – Agriculture – Plant protection products – Article 4 – Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/2049 – Renewal of the approval of the active substance ‘cypermethrin’ – Request for internal review – Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 – Article 10(1) – Decision refusing the request – Risk assessment and risk management – Identification of critical areas of concern – Realistic conditions of use – Precautionary principle.#Case C-316/24 P.

cjeu_case ·
4813

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#SM and Others v Caisse pour l'avenir des enfants.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 45 TFEU – Freedom of movement for workers – Equal treatment – Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 – Article 7(2) – Social advantages – Family allowance – Condition for granting that allowance to a non-resident worker for a child of his or her spouse or registered partner – Requirement that that worker must ‘support’ that child – Assessment criteria – Presumption based on the existence of a joint household – Directive 2004/38/EC – Article 2(2)(c) – Concept of ‘family member’.#Joined Cases C-296/24 to C-307/24.

cjeu_case ·
4814

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#SM and Others v Caisse pour l'avenir des enfants.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation du Grand-Duché de Luxembourg.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 45 TFEU – Freedom of movement for workers – Equal treatment – Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 – Article 7(2) – Social advantages – Family allowance – Condition for granting that allowance to a non-resident worker for a child of his or her spouse or registered partner – Requirement that that worker must ‘support’ that child – Assessment criteria – Presumption based on the existence of a joint household – Directive 2004/38/EC – Article 2(2)(c) – Concept of ‘family member’.#Joined Cases C-296/24 to C-307/24.

cjeu_case ·
4816

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#« Lukoil Bulgaria » EOOD v Komisia za zashtita na konkurentsiata.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Sofia-oblast.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Article 102 TFEU – Abuse of a dominant position – Wholesale market for fuel in Bulgaria – Margin squeeze on competitors – Product market definition – Vertically divided market – Taking into account the excise duty regime.#Case C-260/24.

cjeu_case ·
4817

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#SAS Tenergie Development v Directeur Régional des Douanes de Marseille and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs union – Import and export procedures – Repayment or remission of import or export duties – Transmission of the file requesting remission to the European Commission – Automatic remission of duties – Liability of the Member State – Inadmissibility of the request for a preliminary ruling.#Case C-259/24.

cjeu_case ·
4818

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#SAS Tenergie Development v Directeur Régional des Douanes de Marseille and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs union – Import and export procedures – Repayment or remission of import or export duties – Transmission of the file requesting remission to the European Commission – Automatic remission of duties – Liability of the Member State – Inadmissibility of the request for a preliminary ruling.#Case C-259/24.

cjeu_case ·
4819

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#« Lukoil Bulgaria » EOOD and « Lukoil Neftohim Burgas » AD v Komisia za zashtita na konkurentsiata.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Article 102 TFEU – Abuse of a dominant position – Market for the storage of automotive fuels – Abuse – Refusal of access to essential infrastructure for third-party undertakings – Infrastructure financed by public funds – Privatisation of that infrastructure.#Case C-245/24.

cjeu_case ·
4820

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#« Lukoil Bulgaria » EOOD and « Lukoil Neftohim Burgas » AD v Komisia za zashtita na konkurentsiata.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Sofia-oblast.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Article 102 TFEU – Abuse of a dominant position – Market for the storage of automotive fuels – Abuse – Refusal of access to essential infrastructure for third-party undertakings – Infrastructure financed by public funds – Privatisation of that infrastructure.#Case C-245/24.

cjeu_case ·