Documents : Union européenne

Union supranationale de 27 États membres. Les actes officiels (règlements, directives, décisions) sont publiés par l'Office des publications de l'UE (Cellar/EUR-Lex). La jurisprudence de la Cour de justice de l'UE (CJUE) relève également d'un organe de l'UE.

Site officiel ↗

Types de documents
regulation (161340) cjeu_case (104315) decision (43225) directive (8067)
316 947 documents
43161

Arrêt de la Cour (quatrième chambre) du 2 septembre 2021.#Ja zum Nürburgring eV contre Commission européenne.#Pourvoi – Aides d’État – Aides en faveur du complexe du Nürburgring (Allemagne) – Décision déclarant les aides pour partie incompatibles avec le marché intérieur – Vente des actifs des bénéficiaires des aides d’État déclarées incompatibles – Procédure d’appel d’offres ouverte, transparente, non discriminatoire et inconditionnelle – Décision déclarant que le remboursement des aides incompatibles ne concerne pas le nouveau propriétaire du complexe du Nürburgring et que celui-ci n’a pas bénéficié d’une nouvelle aide pour l’acquisition de ce complexe – Recevabilité – Qualité de partie intéressée – Personne individuellement concernée – Violation des droits procéduraux des parties intéressées – Difficultés exigeant l’ouverture d’une procédure formelle d’examen Motivation Dénaturation des preuves.#Affaire C-647/19 P.

cjeu_case ·
43162

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 2 September 2021.#Ja zum Nürburgring eV v European Commission.#Appeal – State aid – Aid in favour of the Nürburgring complex (Germany) – Decision declaring the aid in part incompatible with the internal market – Sale of the assets of the beneficiaries of the State aid declared to be incompatible – Open, transparent, non-discriminatory and unconditional tender process – Decision declaring that the reimbursement of the incompatible aid did not concern the new owner of the Nürburgring complex and that the latter did not receive new aid for the acquisition of that complex – Admissibility – Status as an interested party – Person individually concerned – Infringement of the procedural rights of the interested parties – Difficulties requiring the initiation of a formal investigation procedure Justification Distortion of the evidence.#Case C-647/19 P.

cjeu_case ·
43163

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 2 September 2021.#The Queen, on the application of: Association of Independent Meat Suppliers and Cleveland Meat Company Ltd v The Food Standards Agency.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of health – Regulation (EC) No 854/2004 – Article 5(2) – Regulation (EC) No 882/2004 – Article 54(3) – Hygiene rules applicable to food of animal origin – Post-mortem inspection of the carcass and offal – Official veterinarian – Health marking – Refusal – Meat declared unfit for human consumption – Right of appeal against a decision of the official veterinarian – Effective judicial protection – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.#Case C-579/19.

cjeu_case ·
43164

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 2 September 2021.#The Queen, on the application of: Association of Independent Meat Suppliers and Cleveland Meat Company Ltd v The Food Standards Agency.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of health – Regulation (EC) No 854/2004 – Article 5(2) – Regulation (EC) No 882/2004 – Article 54(3) – Hygiene rules applicable to food of animal origin – Post-mortem inspection of the carcass and offal – Official veterinarian – Health marking – Refusal – Meat declared unfit for human consumption – Right of appeal against a decision of the official veterinarian – Effective judicial protection – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.#Case C-579/19.

cjeu_case ·
43165

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 2 September 2021.#Irish Ferries Ltd v National Transport Authority.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Maritime transport – Rights of passengers when travelling by sea and inland waterway – Regulation (EU) No 1177/2010 – Articles 18 and 19, Article 20(4), and Articles 24 and 25 – Cancellation of passenger services – Late delivery of a vessel to the carrier – Notice given prior to the originally scheduled date of departure – Consequences – Right to re-routing – Procedures – Payment of the additional costs – Right to compensation – Calculation – Concept of ticket price – National body responsible for the enforcement of Regulation No 1177/2010 – Competence – Concept of a complaint – Assessment of validity – Articles 16, 17, 20 and 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Principles of proportionality, legal certainty and equal treatment.#Case C-570/19.

cjeu_case ·
43166

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 2 September 2021.#Irish Ferries Ltd v National Transport Authority.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Maritime transport – Rights of passengers when travelling by sea and inland waterway – Regulation (EU) No 1177/2010 – Articles 18 and 19, Article 20(4), and Articles 24 and 25 – Cancellation of passenger services – Late delivery of a vessel to the carrier – Notice given prior to the originally scheduled date of departure – Consequences – Right to re-routing – Procedures – Payment of the additional costs – Right to compensation – Calculation – Concept of ticket price – National body responsible for the enforcement of Regulation No 1177/2010 – Competence – Concept of a complaint – Assessment of validity – Articles 16, 17, 20 and 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Principles of proportionality, legal certainty and equal treatment.#Case C-570/19.

cjeu_case ·
43167

Arrêt de la Cour (quatrième chambre) du 2 septembre 2021.#Commission européenne contre Tempus Energy Ltd et Tempus Energy Technology Ltd.#Pourvoi – Aides d’État – Régime d’aide – Article 108, paragraphes 2 et 3, TFUE – Règlement (CE) no 659/1999 – Article 4, paragraphes 3 et 4 – Notion de “doutes quant à la compatibilité d’une mesure notifiée avec le marché commun” – Décision de ne pas soulever d’objections – Absence d’ouverture de la procédure formelle d’examen – Lignes directrices concernant les aides d’État à la protection de l’environnement et à l’énergie pour la période 2014-2020 – Code de bonnes pratiques pour la conduite des procédures de contrôle des aides d’État – Contacts de “prénotification” – Droits procéduraux des parties intéressées – Marché de capacité d’électricité au Royaume‑Uni.#Affaire C-57/19 P.

cjeu_case ·
43168

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 2 September 2021.#European Commission v Tempus Energy Ltd and Tempus Energy Technology Ltd.#Appeal – State aid – Aid scheme – Article 108(2) and (3) TFEU – Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 – Article 4(3) and (4) – Concept of ‘doubts as to the compatibility of a notified measure with the common market’ – Decision not to raise objections – Formal investigation procedure not initiated – Guidelines on State aid for environmental protection and energy 2014-2020 – Code of Best Practice for the conduct of State aid control procedures – ‘Pre-notification’ contacts – Procedural rights of interested parties – Electricity capacity market in the United Kingdom.#Case C-57/19 P.

cjeu_case ·
43169

Case C-932/19: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 2 September 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Győri Ítélőtábla — Hungary) — JZ v OTP Jelzálogbank Zrt., OTP Bank Nyrt., OTP Faktoring Követeléskezelő Zrt. (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Consumer protection — Unfair terms — Directive 93/13/EEC — Article 1(2) — Article 6(1) — Loan denominated in foreign currency — Difference between the exchange rate applicable when the loaned funds are released and when they are repaid — Member State legislation providing for the replacement of an unfair term by a provision of national law — Possibility for the national court to invalidate the entire agreement containing the unfair term — Possible consideration of the protection offered by that legislation and of the consumer’s wishes regarding its application)

cjeu_case ·
43170

Case C-930/19: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 2 September 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil du contentieux des étrangers — Belgium) — X v Belgian State (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 2004/38/EC — Article 13(2) — Right of residence of family members of a Union citizen — Marriage between a Union citizen and a third-country national — Retention, in the event of divorce, of the right of residence by a third-country national who is the victim of acts of domestic violence committed by his or her spouse — Requirement to demonstrate the existence of sufficient resources — No such requirement in Directive 2003/86/EC — Validity — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Articles 20 and 21 — Equal treatment — Difference in treatment based on whether the sponsor is a Union citizen or a third-country national — Non-comparability of situations)

cjeu_case ·
43171

Case C-928/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 2 September 2021 — European Federation of Public Service Unions (EPSU) v European Commission, Jan Willem Goudriaan (Appeal — Law governing the institutions — Social policy — Articles 154 and 155 TFEU — Social dialogue between management and labour at EU level — Informing and consulting civil servants and employees of central government administrations of the Member States — Agreement concluded between the social partners — Joint request of the signatories to that agreement seeking its implementation at EU level — Refusal of the European Commission to submit a proposal for a decision to the Council of the European Union — Standard of judicial review — Obligation to state reasons for the decision refusing to submit the proposal)

cjeu_case ·
43172

Case C-854/19: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 2 September 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Köln — Germany) — Vodafone GmbH v Bundesrepublik Deutschland, represented by the Bundesnetzagentur für Elektrizität, Gas, Telekommunikation, Post und Eisenbahnen (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Electronic communications — Regulation (EU) 2015/2120 — Article 3 — Open internet access — Article 3(1) — End users’ rights — Article 3(2) — Prohibition of agreements and commercial practices limiting the exercise of end users’ rights — Article 3(3) — Obligation of equal and non-discriminatory treatment of traffic — Possibility of implementing reasonable traffic management measures — Additional ‘zero tariff’ option — ‘Zero tariff’ excluded in the case of roaming)

cjeu_case ·
43173

Case C-836/19: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 2 September 2021 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Gera — Germany) — Toropet Ltd. v Landkreis Greiz (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Public health — Health rules concerning animal by-products not intended for human consumption — Regulation (EC) No 1069/2009 — Article 9(d) and Article 10(a) and (f) — Classification of products — Decomposition, deterioration and presence of foreign bodies in the material — Impact on the initial classification)

cjeu_case ·
43174

Case C-790/19: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 2 September 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Braşov — Romania) — Parchetul de pe lângă Tribunalul Braşov v LG, MH (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Prevention of the use of the financial system for the purposes of money laundering and terrorist financing — Directive (EU) 2015/849 — Directive 2005/60/EC — Offence of money laundering — Laundering by the perpetrator of the predicate offence (‘self-laundering’))

cjeu_case ·
43175

Case C-741/19: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 2 September 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d’appel de Paris — France) — Republic of Moldova v Komstroy LLC, successor in law to the company Energoalians (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Energy Charter Treaty — Article 26 — Inapplicability between Member States — Arbitration Award — Judicial review — Jurisdiction of a court of a Member State — Dispute between a third-State operator and a third State — Jurisdiction of the Court — Article 1(6) of the Energy Charter Treaty — Concept of ‘investment’)

cjeu_case ·
43176

Joined Cases C-721/19 and C-722/19: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 2 September 2021 (references for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato — Italy) — Sisal SpA (C-721/19), Stanleybet Malta Ltd (C-722/19), Magellan Robotech Ltd (C-722/19) v Agenzia delle Dogane e dei Monopoli, Ministero dell'Economia e delle Finanze (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Articles 49 and 56 TFEU — Free movement of services — Restrictions — Directive 2014/23/EU — Concession award procedure — Article 43 — Substantial amendments — Instant lottery games — National legislation providing for the renewal of a concession without a new tendering procedure — Directive 89/665/EEC — Article 1(3) — Legal interest in bringing proceedings)

cjeu_case ·
43177

Case C-665/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 2 September 2021 — NeXovation Inc. v European Commission (Appeal — State aid — Aid in favour of the Nürburgring complex (Germany) — Decision declaring the aid partly incompatible with the internal market — Sale of the assets of the beneficiaries of the State aid found to be incompatible — Open, transparent, non-discriminatory and unconditional tender process — Decision declaring that the reimbursement of incompatible aid did not concern the new owner of the Nürburgring complex and that the latter did not receive new aid for the acquisition of that complex — Admissibility — Status as an interested party — Person individually concerned — Infringement of the procedural rights of the interested parties — Difficulties requiring the initiation of a formal investigation procedure — Justification)

cjeu_case ·
43178

Case C-647/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 2 September 2021 — Ja zum Nürburgring eV v European Commission (Appeal — State aid — Aid in favour of the Nürburgring complex (Germany) — Decision declaring the aid in part incompatible with the internal market — Sale of the assets of the beneficiaries of the State aid declared to be incompatible — Open, transparent, non-discriminatory and unconditional tender process — Decision declaring that the reimbursement of the incompatible aid did not concern the new owner of the Nürburgring complex and that the latter did not receive new aid for the acquisition of that complex — Admissibility — Status as an interested party — Person individually concerned — Infringement of the procedural rights of the interested parties — Difficulties requiring the initiation of a formal investigation procedure — Justification — Distortion of the evidence)

cjeu_case ·
43179

Case C-579/19: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 2 September 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom — United Kingdom) — The Queen, on the application of: Association of Independent Meat Suppliers, Cleveland Meat Company Ltd v Food Standards Agency (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Protection of health — Regulation (EC) No 854/2004 — Article 5(2) — Regulation (EC) No 882/2004 — Article 54(3) — Hygiene rules applicable to food of animal origin — Post-mortem inspection of the carcass and offal — Official veterinarian — Health marking — Refusal — Meat declared unfit for human consumption — Right of appeal against a decision of the official veterinarian — Effective judicial protection — Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union)

cjeu_case ·
43180

Case C-570/19: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 2 September 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court (Ireland) — Ireland) — Irish Ferries Ltd v National Transport Authority (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Maritime transport — Rights of passengers when travelling by sea and inland waterway — Regulation (EU) No 1177/2010 — Articles 18 and 19, Article 20(4), and Articles 24 and 25 — Cancellation of passenger services — Late delivery of a vessel to the carrier — Notice given prior to the originally scheduled date of departure — Consequences — Right to re-routing — Procedures — Payment of the additional costs — Right to compensation — Calculation — Concept of ticket price — National body responsible for the enforcement of Regulation No 1177/2010 — Competence — Concept of a complaint — Assessment of validity — Articles 16, 17, 20 and 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Principles of proportionality, legal certainty and equal treatment)

cjeu_case ·