Documents : Union européenne

Union supranationale de 27 États membres. Les actes officiels (règlements, directives, décisions) sont publiés par l'Office des publications de l'UE (Cellar/EUR-Lex). La jurisprudence de la Cour de justice de l'UE (CJUE) relève également d'un organe de l'UE.

Site officiel ↗

Types de documents
regulation (161340) cjeu_case (104315) decision (43225) directive (8067)
316 947 documents
31981

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 8 December 2022.#QE v Caisse régionale de Crédit mutuel de Loire-Atlantique et du Centre Ouest.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Directive 93/13/EEC – Article 3(1) – Article 4 – Criteria for assessing whether a term is unfair – Term relating to the accelerated repayment of a loan agreement – Contractual dispensation from the requirement for a formal written demand.#Case C-600/21.

cjeu_case ·
31984

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 8 December 2022.#Criminal proceedings against HYA and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Directive (EU) 2016/343 – Strengthening of certain aspects of the presumption of innocence and of the right to be present at the trial in criminal proceedings – Article 8(1) – Right of an accused person to be present at the trial – Second paragraph of Article 47 and Article 48(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to a fair trial and rights of the defence – Examination of witnesses for the prosecution in the absence of the accused person and his or her lawyer at the pre-trial stage of the criminal proceedings – Impossibility of examining witnesses for the prosecution during the judicial stage of those proceedings – National legislation allowing a criminal court to base its decision on the prior testimony of those witnesses.#Case C-348/21.

cjeu_case ·
31985

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 8 December 2022.#Criminal proceedings against HYA and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Directive (EU) 2016/343 – Strengthening of certain aspects of the presumption of innocence and of the right to be present at the trial in criminal proceedings – Article 8(1) – Right of an accused person to be present at the trial – Second paragraph of Article 47 and Article 48(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to a fair trial and rights of the defence – Examination of witnesses for the prosecution in the absence of the accused person and his or her lawyer at the pre-trial stage of the criminal proceedings – Impossibility of examining witnesses for the prosecution during the judicial stage of those proceedings – National legislation allowing a criminal court to base its decision on the prior testimony of those witnesses.#Case C-348/21.

cjeu_case ·
31986

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 8 December 2022.#Luxury Trust Automobil GmbH v Finanzamt Österreich.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 42(a) – Article 197(1)(c) – Article 226(11a) – Article 141 – Exemption – Triangular transaction – Designation of the final recipient of a supply as being liable for VAT – Invoicing – Reference to ‘Reverse charge’ – Mandatory – Omission of that reference on an invoice – Retroactive correction of the invoice.#Case C-247/21.

cjeu_case ·
31987

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 8 December 2022.#Luxury Trust Automobil GmbH v Finanzamt Österreich.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 42(a) – Article 197(1)(c) – Article 226(11a) – Article 141 – Exemption – Triangular transaction – Designation of the final recipient of a supply as being liable for VAT – Invoicing – Reference to ‘Reverse charge’ – Mandatory – Omission of that reference on an invoice – Retroactive correction of the invoice.#Case C-247/21.

cjeu_case ·
31988

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 8 December 2022.#VS v Inspektor v Inspektorata kam Visshia sadeben savet.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Articles 2, 4 and 6 – Applicability of Regulation 2016/679 – Concept of ‘legitimate interest’ – Concept of ‘task carried out in the public interest or in the exercise of official authority’ – Directive (EU) 2016/680 – Articles 1, 3, 4, 6 and 9 – Lawfulness of the processing of personal data collected in the course of a criminal investigation – Subsequent processing of data relating to a presumed victim of a criminal offence for the purpose of making a formal accusation in respect of him or her – Concept of purpose ‘other than that for which the personal data are collected’ – Data used by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State for the purposes of its defence in an action for damages against the State.#Case C-180/21.

cjeu_case ·
31989

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 8 December 2022.#VS v Inspektor v Inspektorata kam Visshia sadeben savet.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad - Blagoevgrad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Articles 2, 4 and 6 – Applicability of Regulation 2016/679 – Concept of ‘legitimate interest’ – Concept of ‘task carried out in the public interest or in the exercise of official authority’ – Directive (EU) 2016/680 – Articles 1, 3, 4, 6 and 9 – Lawfulness of the processing of personal data collected in the course of a criminal investigation – Subsequent processing of data relating to a presumed victim of a criminal offence for the purpose of making a formal accusation in respect of him or her – Concept of purpose ‘other than that for which the personal data are collected’ – Data used by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State for the purposes of its defence in an action for damages against the State.#Case C-180/21.

cjeu_case ·
31990

Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 8 December 2022.#VW v SW and Others and Legea S.r.l. v VW and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Trade mark law – Directive 89/104/EEC – Directive (EU) 2015/2436 – Regulation (EC) No 40/94 – Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Exclusive rights of the trade mark proprietor – Trade mark belonging to two or more persons – Conditions on majority required between joint proprietors for granting and terminating a licence of their trade mark.#Case C-686/21.

cjeu_case ·
31991

Opinion of Advocate General Pitruzzella delivered on 8 December 2022.#Finanzamt X v Y.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 135(2), first subparagraph, point (c) – Exceptions to the exemption provided for in Article 135(1)(l) – Letting of permanently installed equipment and machinery in the context of the leasing of an agricultural building.#Case C-516/21.

cjeu_case ·
31992

Case C-769/21: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 8 December 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Administratīvā rajona tiesa — Latvia) — AAS ‘BTA Baltic Insurance Company’ v Iepirkumu uzraudzības birojs, Tieslietu ministrija (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Public procurement — Directive 2014/24/EU — Article 18(1) — Principles of equal treatment, transparency and proportionality — Decision to withdraw an invitation to tender — Tenders submitted separately by two tenderers belonging to the same economic operator and constituting the two most economically advantageous tenders — Refusal of the successful tenderer to sign the contract — Decision of the contracting authority to refuse the tender of the next tenderer, terminate the procedure and issue a new call for tenders)

cjeu_case ·
31993

Case C-731/21: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 8 December 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation du Grand-Duché de Luxembourg — Luxembourg) — GV v Caisse nationale d’assurance pension (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Free movement of persons — Article 45 TFEU — Workers — Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 — Article 7(1) and (2) — Equal treatment — Social advantages — Survivor’s pension — Members of a civil partnership — National legislation making the grant of a survivor’s pension conditional upon the entry in the national register of a partnership that was validly concluded and registered in another Member State)

cjeu_case ·
31994

Case C-625/21: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 8 December 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof — Austria) — VB v GUPFINGER Einrichtungsstudio GmbH (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 93/13/EEC — Unfair terms in consumer contracts — Unjustified withdrawal from a contract by the consumer — Term determining the trader’s right to compensation declared unfair — Application of supplementary national law)

cjeu_case ·
31995

Case C-600/21: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 8 December 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation — France) — QE v Caisse régionale de Crédit mutuel de Loire-Atlantique et du Centre Ouest (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Consumer protection — Unfair terms in consumer contracts — Directive 93/13/EEC — Article 3(1) — Article 4 — Criteria for assessing whether a term is unfair — Term relating to the accelerated repayment of a loan agreement — Contractual dispensation from the requirement for a formal written demand)

cjeu_case ·
31996

Case C-378/21: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 8 December 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzgericht — Austria) — P GmbH v Finanzamt Österreich (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Harmonisation of fiscal legislation — Common system of value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Article 203 — Adjustment of the VAT return — Recipients of services who are not entitled to make deductions — No risk of loss of tax revenue)

cjeu_case ·
31997

Case C-348/21: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 8 December 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski gradski sad — Bulgaria) — Criminal proceedings against HYA, IP, DD, ZI, SS (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Directive (EU) 2016/343 — Strengthening of certain aspects of the presumption of innocence and of the right to be present at the trial in criminal proceedings — Article 8(1) — Right of an accused person to be present at the trial — Second paragraph of Article 47 and Article 48(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Right to a fair trial and rights of the defence — Examination of witnesses for the prosecution in the absence of the accused person and his or her lawyer at the pre-trial stage of the criminal proceedings — Impossibility of examining witnesses for the prosecution during the judicial stage of those proceedings — National legislation allowing a criminal court to base its decision on the prior testimony of those witnesses)

cjeu_case ·
31998

Case C-247/21: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 8 December 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof — Austria) — Luxury Trust Automobil GmbH v Finanzamt Österreich (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Article 42(a) — Article 197(1)(c) — Article 226(11a) — Article 141 — Exemption — Triangular transaction — Designation of the final recipient of a supply as being liable for VAT — Invoicing — Reference to ‘Reverse charge’ — Mandatory — Omission of that reference on an invoice — Retroactive correction of the invoice)

cjeu_case ·
31999

Case C-180/21: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 8 December 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad — Blagoevgrad — Bulgaria) — VS v Inspektor v Inspektorata kam Visshia sadeben savet (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data — Regulation (EU) 2016/679 — Articles 2, 4 and 6 — Applicability of Regulation 2016/679 — Concept of ‘legitimate interest’ — Concept of ‘task carried out in the public interest or in the exercise of official authority’ — Directive (EU) 2016/680 — Articles 1, 3, 4, 6 and 9 — Lawfulness of the processing of personal data collected in the course of a criminal investigation — Subsequent processing of data relating to a presumed victim of a criminal offence for the purpose of making a formal accusation in respect of him or her — Concept of purpose ‘other than that for which the personal data are collected’ — Data used by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State for the purposes of its defence in an action for damages against the State)

cjeu_case ·