Documents : Union européenne

Union supranationale de 27 États membres. Les actes officiels (règlements, directives, décisions) sont publiés par l'Office des publications de l'UE (Cellar/EUR-Lex). La jurisprudence de la Cour de justice de l'UE (CJUE) relève également d'un organe de l'UE.

Site officiel ↗

Types de documents
regulation (161334) cjeu_case (104314) decision (43198) directive (8067)
316 913 documents
25221

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 5 October 2023.#AL v Princess Holdings.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2), Article 94(b) and (c) and Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Consumer protection – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Bills of exchange – Requirement to set out the regulatory context of the main proceedings – Requirement to state the reasons justifying the need for a reply from the Court – Manifest inadmissibility in part – No jurisdiction of the court of enforcement hearing an objection to assess, of its own motion or at the request of the consumer concerned, the unfairness of the terms of the contract concluded by that consumer with a seller or supplier and forming the basis of the issue of the bills of exchange the enforceability of which is in dispute.#Case C-25/23.

cjeu_case ·
25222

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 5 October 2023.#AL v Princess Holdings.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Qorti tal-Maġistrati (Malta).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2), Article 94(b) and (c) and Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Consumer protection – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Bills of exchange – Requirement to set out the regulatory context of the main proceedings – Requirement to state the reasons justifying the need for a reply from the Court – Manifest inadmissibility in part – No jurisdiction of the court of enforcement hearing an objection to assess, of its own motion or at the request of the consumer concerned, the unfairness of the terms of the contract concluded by that consumer with a seller or supplier and forming the basis of the issue of the bills of exchange the enforceability of which is in dispute.#Case C-25/23.

cjeu_case ·
25224

Case C-151/23, ZSE Elektrárne: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 5 October 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Najvyšší správny súd Slovenskej republiky — Slovakia) — ZSE Elektrárne, s.r.o v Finančné riaditeľstvo Slovenskej republiky (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Common system of value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Article 183 — Excess VAT — Late refund — Taxable person’s entitlement to interest for late payment — Methods of application — Procedural autonomy of the Member States — Principles of effectiveness and fiscal neutrality — National legislation setting the starting point for the calculation of interest for late payment at a date later than that on which the refund would have had to be made had a tax investigation not been carried out)

cjeu_case ·
25225

Case C-84/23, Dinamel: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 5 October 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Înalta Curte de Casație și Justiție — Romania) — SC Dinamel Trade SRL v Ministerul Agriculturii şi Dezvoltării Rurale (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Agriculture — Common organisation of the markets — Union scales for the classification of beef, pig and sheep carcasses — Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/1182 — Derogations from the general obligation to classify carcasses — Slaughterhouses — Article 2(1) — Derogations granted to small scale establishments — National legislation which makes no provision for the grant of such derogations — Compulsory or optional nature of such derogations)

cjeu_case ·
25226

Case C-43/23 P: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 5 October 2023 — DL (*) v European Parliament, Council of the European Union (Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Public health — Regulation (EU) 2022/1034 — Regulation (EU) 2021/953 — ‘EU Digital COVID Certificate’ — Free movement of persons — Right to healthcare and to life — Restrictions — Appeal, in part, manifestly inadmissible and, in part, manifestly unfounded)

cjeu_case ·
25227

Case C-25/23, Princess Holdings: Order of the Court of 5 October 2023 (Ninth Chamber) (request for a preliminary ruling from the Qorti tal-Maġistrati fil-qasam ċivili — Malta) — AL v Princess Holdings (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2), Article 94(b) and (c) and Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Consumer protection — Unfair terms in consumer contracts — Bills of exchange — Requirement to set out the regulatory context of the main proceedings — Requirement to state the reasons justifying the need for a reply from the Court — Manifest inadmissibility in part — No jurisdiction of the court of enforcement hearing an objection to assess, of its own motion or at the request of the consumer concerned, the unfairness of the terms of the contract concluded by that consumer with a seller or supplier and forming the basis of the issue of the bills of exchange the enforceability of which is in dispute)

cjeu_case ·
25229

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 5 October 2023.#MV v European Commission.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Civil service – Notice of Open Competition EPSO/AD/364/19 – Security Officers (AD 7) – Decision of the Selection Board to exclude the appellant from the next stage of the competition – Obligation to state reasons – Possibility for the administration to supplement the statement of reasons for the decision to exclude at the complaint stage – Action for annulment and for damages.#Case C-786/22 P.

cjeu_case ·
25230

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 5 October 2023.#MV v European Commission.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Civil service – Notice of Open Competition EPSO/AD/364/19 – Security Officers (AD 7) – Decision of the Selection Board to exclude the appellant from the next stage of the competition – Obligation to state reasons – Possibility for the administration to supplement the statement of reasons for the decision to exclude at the complaint stage – Action for annulment and for damages.#Case C-786/22 P.

cjeu_case ·
25231

Ordonnance de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 5 octobre 2023.#Verband Wirtschaft im Wettbewerb Verein für Lauterkeit in Handel und Industrie eV contre Roller GmbH & Co. KG.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 99 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Réponse ne laissant place à aucun doute raisonnable – Énergie – Cadre pour l’étiquetage énergétique – Règlement (UE) 2017/1369 – Article 6, premier alinéa, sous a) – Obligation des fournisseurs et des revendeurs d’un produit de faire référence, dans leurs publicités visuelles, à la classe d’efficacité énergétique de ce produit et à la gamme des classes d’efficacité énergétique figurant sur l’étiquette du groupe de produits concerné – Applicabilité directe de cette obligation – Marge d’appréciation dont disposent ces fournisseurs et ces revendeurs pour satisfaire à ladite obligation en l’absence d’adoption d’un acte délégué sur le fondement de ce règlement.#Affaire C-761/22.

cjeu_case ·
25232

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 5 October 2023.#Verband Wirtschaft im Wettbewerb Verein für Lauterkeit in Handel und Industrie eV v Roller GmbH & Co. KG.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Bochum.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Reply which admits of no reasonable doubt – Energy – Framework for energy labelling – Regulation (EU) 2017/1369 – Article 6, first paragraph, point (a) – Obligation on suppliers and dealers of a product to make reference, in their visual advertisements, to the energy efficiency class of that product and the range of energy efficiency classes shown on the label for the product group concerned – Direct applicability of that obligation – Margin of discretion available to those suppliers and dealers to comply with that obligation in the absence of the adoption of a delegated act on the basis of that regulation.#Case C-761/22.

cjeu_case ·
25234

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 5 October 2023.#RK v Ministerstvo zdravotnictví.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší správní soud.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 4(2) – Concept of ‘processing’ of personal data – Mobile application – Verification of the validity of ‘EU Digital COVID Certificates’ issued pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2021/953.#Case C-659/22.

cjeu_case ·
25237

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 5 October 2023.#Deco Proteste - Editores Lda v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Taxable transactions – Article 2(1)(a) – Supply of goods for consideration – Free supply of a tablet or smartphone in exchange for a new subscription to a magazine – Concept of ‘single supply’ – Criteria – Second paragraph of Article 16 – Application of goods for business use as gifts of small value.#Case C-505/22.

cjeu_case ·
25238

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 5 October 2023.#Deco Proteste - Editores Lda v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Arbitral Tributário (Centro de Arbitragem Administrativa - CAAD).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Taxable transactions – Article 2(1)(a) – Supply of goods for consideration – Free supply of a tablet or smartphone in exchange for a new subscription to a magazine – Concept of ‘single supply’ – Criteria – Second paragraph of Article 16 – Application of goods for business use as gifts of small value.#Case C-505/22.

cjeu_case ·
25239

Arrêt de la Cour (septième chambre) du 5 octobre 2023.#EI contre SC Brink’s Cash Solutions SRL.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Politique sociale – Rapprochement des législations des États membres relatives aux licenciements collectifs – Directive 98/59/CE – Article 1er, paragraphe 1, premier alinéa, sous b), et article 6 – Procédure d’information et de consultation des travailleurs en cas de projet de licenciement collectif – Absence de désignation de représentants des travailleurs – Réglementation nationale permettant à un employeur de ne pas individuellement informer et consulter les travailleurs concernés.#Affaire C-496/22.

cjeu_case ·
25240

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 5 October 2023.#EI v S.C. Brink’s Cash Solutions S.R.L.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bucureşti.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to collective redundancies – Directive 98/59/EC – The first subparagraph of Article 1(1)(b) and Article 6 – Procedure for informing and consulting workers in the event of projected collective redundancies – No workers’ representatives appointed – National legislation allowing an employer not to inform and consult the workers concerned individually.#Case C-496/22.

cjeu_case ·