Legal documents catalogue (cjeu_case)

104,314 documents
19567

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 15 February 2023.#Bundesrepublik Deutschland v GS, represented by his parents.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Immigration policy – Return of illegally staying third-country nationals – Directive 2008/115/EC – Article 5(a) and (b) – Return decision adopted in respect of a third-country national – Minor third-country national separated from parents in the event of return – Best interests of the child – Right to respect for family life.#Case C-484/22.

cjeu_case ·
19568

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 15 February 2023.#Bundesrepublik Deutschland v GS, represented by his parents.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Immigration policy – Return of illegally staying third-country nationals – Directive 2008/115/EC – Article 5(a) and (b) – Return decision adopted in respect of a third-country national – Minor third-country national separated from parents in the event of return – Best interests of the child – Right to respect for family life.#Case C-484/22.

cjeu_case ·
19569

Case C-484/22, Bundesrepublik Deutschland (Return of a minor without his parents): Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 15 February 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht — Germany) — Bundesrepublik Deutschland v GS, represented by his parents (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Immigration policy — Return of illegally staying third-country nationals — Directive 2008/115/EC — Article 5(a) and (b) — Return decision adopted in respect of a third-country national — Minor third-country national separated from parents in the event of return — Best interests of the child — Right to respect for family life)

cjeu_case ·
19574

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 15 February 2023.#Belaeronavigatsia v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Belarus – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – Concept of ‘person responsible for repression’ – Error of assessment – Proportionality.#Case T-536/21.

cjeu_case ·
19575

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 15 February 2023.#Belaeronavigatsia v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Belarus – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – Concept of ‘person responsible for repression’ – Error of assessment – Proportionality.#Case T-536/21.

cjeu_case ·
19576

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 15 February 2023.#Aquind Ltd and Others v European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators.#Energy – Competence of ACER – Withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union – Error of law – Article 2(1) of Regulation (EU) 2019/943 – Article 92 of the Withdrawal Agreement – Ad hoc exemption regime under Article 308 of and Annex 28 to the Trade and Cooperation Agreement.#Case T-492/21.

cjeu_case ·
19577

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 15 February 2023.#Aquind Ltd and Others v European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators.#Energy – Competence of ACER – Withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union – Error of law – Article 2(1) of Regulation (EU) 2019/943 – Article 92 of the Withdrawal Agreement – Ad hoc exemption regime under Article 308 of and Annex 28 to the Trade and Cooperation Agreement.#Case T-492/21.

cjeu_case ·
19578

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 15 February 2023.#RH v European Commission.#Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance – Financial Regulation – Investigation by OLAF – Commission decision imposing an administrative penalty – Exclusion from procurement and grant award procedures funded by the general budget of the European Union and by the EDF – Entry on the database of the early detection and exclusion system – Grave professional misconduct – Manifest error of assessment – Non-contractual liability – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals.#Case T-175/21.

cjeu_case ·
19579

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 15 February 2023.#RH v European Commission.#Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance – Financial Regulation – Investigation by OLAF – Commission decision imposing an administrative penalty – Exclusion from procurement and grant award procedures funded by the general budget of the European Union and by the EDF – Entry on the database of the early detection and exclusion system – Grave professional misconduct – Manifest error of assessment – Non-contractual liability – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals.#Case T-175/21.

cjeu_case ·