18721Case C-651/21, M. Ya. M. (Co-heir’s waiver of succession): Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 30 March 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad — Bulgaria) — Proceedings brought by M. Ya. M. (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Measures relating to the law on succession — Regulation (EU) No 650/2012 — Article 13 — Declaration concerning the waiver of a succession made by an heir before the court of the Member State of his or her habitual residence — Subsequent registration of that declaration, at the request of another heir, in the register of another Member State)cjeu_case · 30 mars 2023
18722Case C-618/21, AR and Others (Direct action against the insurer): Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 30 March 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy dla m.st. Warszawy w Warszawie — Poland) — AR and Others v PK and Others (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Approximation of laws — Insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles — Directive 2009/103/EC — Article 3 — Compulsory insurance of vehicles — Article 18 — Direct right of action — Scope — Determination of the amount of compensation — Hypothetical costs — Possibility of making the payment of compensation subject to certain conditions — Sale of the vehicle)cjeu_case · 30 mars 2023
18723Case C-616/21, Gmina L.: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 30 March 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny — Poland) — Dyrektor Krajowej Informacji Skarbowej v Gmina L. (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Taxation — Value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Article 2(1)(c) — Supply of services for consideration — Article 9(1) — Meanings of ‘taxable person’ and ‘economic activity’ — Municipality which arranges for asbestos removal for the benefit of its residents who own immovable property and who have expressed the wish for that — Reimbursement of the municipality by a subsidy from the competent provincial authority of 40 % to 100 % of the costs — Article 13(1) — Municipalities not subject to tax for the activities or transactions carried out as public authorities)cjeu_case · 30 mars 2023
18724Case C-612/21, Gmina O.: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 30 March 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny — Poland) — Gmina O. v Dyrektor Krajowej Informacji Skarbowej (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Taxation — Value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Article 2(1)(a) and (c) — Supply of goods and services for consideration — Article 9(1) — Meanings of ‘taxable person’ and ‘economic activity’ — Municipality which organises the installation of renewable energy on its territory for its residents who own immovable property and who have expressed the wish to be equipped with renewable energy systems — Their contribution amounting to 25 % of the subsidisable costs, without being able to exceed a maximum value agreed between the municipality and the interested property owner — Reimbursement of the municipality by a subsidy from the competent provincial authority of 75 % of the subsidisable costs — Article 13(1) — Municipalities not subject to tax for the activities or transactions carried out as public authorities)cjeu_case · 30 mars 2023
18725Case C-556/21, Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid (Suspension of the transfer time limit on appeal): Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 30 March 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State — Netherlands) — Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid v E.N., S.S., J.Y. (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 — Determination of the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection — Article 27 — Appeal against a decision to transfer an asylum seeker — Article 29 — Transfer time limit — Suspension of that time limit on appeal — Interim measure requested by the authorities)cjeu_case · 30 mars 2023
18726Case C-338/21, Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid (Transfer time limit — Trafficking in human beings): Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 30 March 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State — Netherlands) — Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid v S.S., N.Z., S.S (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 — Determination of the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection — Article 27 — Appeal against a transfer decision taken in respect of an asylum seeker — Article 29 — Suspension of implementation of the transfer decision — Transfer time limit — Interruption of the transfer time limit — Directive 2004/81/EC — Residence permit issued to third-country nationals who are victims of trafficking in human beings or who have been the subject of an action to facilitate illegal immigration, who cooperate with the competent authorities — Article 6 — Reflection period — Prohibition on enforcing an expulsion order — Remedies)cjeu_case · 30 mars 2023
18727Case C-34/21, Hauptpersonalrat der Lehrerinnen und Lehrer: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 30 March 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Wiesbaden — Germany) — Hauptpersonalrat der Lehrerinnen und Lehrer beim Hessischen Kultusministerium v Minister des Hessischen Kultusministeriums (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Protection of personal data — Regulation (EU) 2016/679 — Article 88(1) and (2) — Processing of data in the employment context — Regional school system — Teaching by videoconference as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic — Implementation without the express consent of the teachers)cjeu_case · 30 mars 2023
18728Opinion of Advocate General Pitruzzella delivered on 30 March 2023.#K.L. v X sp. z o.o.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy dla Krakowa - Nowej Huty w Krakowie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Directive 1999/70/EC – Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP – Clause 4 – Principle of non-discrimination – Difference in treatment in the event of dismissal – Termination of a fixed-term employment contract – No obligation to state the reasons for termination – Judicial review – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.#Case C-715/20.cjeu_case · 30 mars 2023
18729Case T-170/23: Action brought on 29 March 2023 — Amstel Brouwerij v EUIPO — Anheuser-Busch (ULTRA)cjeu_case · 29 mars 2023
18731Case C-207/23, Finanzamt X: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany) lodged on 29 March 2023 — Finanzamt X v Y KGcjeu_case · 29 mars 2023
18732Case C-206/23: Action brought on 29 March 2023 — European Commission v Republic of Bulgariacjeu_case · 29 mars 2023
18733Order of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 29 March 2023.#Muriel Mozelsio v European Commission.#Civil service – Contract staff – Retirement pensions – Pension rights acquired before entry into the service of the European Union – Transfer to the EU scheme – Additional years of pensionable service – Action for annulment – Request for repayment of part of the capital transferred – Unjust enrichment – Time limit for complaints – Manifest inadmissibility – Application for an order – Manifest lack of jurisdiction.#Case T-343/22.cjeu_case · 29 mars 2023
18734Order of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 29 March 2023.#Muriel Mozelsio v European Commission.#Civil service – Contract staff – Retirement pensions – Pension rights acquired before entry into the service of the European Union – Transfer to the EU scheme – Additional years of pensionable service – Action for annulment – Request for repayment of part of the capital transferred – Unjust enrichment – Time limit for complaints – Manifest inadmissibility – Application for an order – Manifest lack of jurisdiction.#Case T-343/22.cjeu_case · 29 mars 2023
18735Order of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 29 March 2023.#Despina Oxyzoglou v European Commission.#Civil service – Contract staff – Retirement pensions – Pension rights acquired before entry into the service of the European Union – Transfer to the EU scheme – Additional years of pensionable service – Action for annulment – Request for repayment of part of the capital transferred – Unjust enrichment – Time limit for complaints – Manifest inadmissibility – Application for an order – Manifest lack of jurisdiction.#Case T-342/22.cjeu_case · 29 mars 2023
18736Order of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 29 March 2023.#Despina Oxyzoglou v European Commission.#Civil service – Contract staff – Retirement pensions – Pension rights acquired before entry into the service of the European Union – Transfer to the EU scheme – Additional years of pensionable service – Action for annulment – Request for repayment of part of the capital transferred – Unjust enrichment – Time limit for complaints – Manifest inadmissibility – Application for an order – Manifest lack of jurisdiction.#Case T-342/22.cjeu_case · 29 mars 2023
18737Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 29 March 2023.#Veronika Machková v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark ALMARA SOAP – Earlier EU word mark ALMENARA – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Proof of genuine use of the earlier mark – Article 47(2) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-436/22.cjeu_case · 29 mars 2023
18738Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 29 March 2023.#Veronika Machková v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark ALMARA SOAP – Earlier EU word mark ALMENARA – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Proof of genuine use of the earlier mark – Article 47(2) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-436/22.cjeu_case · 29 mars 2023
18739Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 29 March 2023.#celotec GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark DECOTEC – Absolute ground for invalidity – Lack of descriptiveness – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-308/22.cjeu_case · 29 mars 2023
18740Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 29 March 2023.#celotec GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark DECOTEC – Absolute ground for invalidity – Lack of descriptiveness – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-308/22.cjeu_case · 29 mars 2023