18261Case C-288/23, El Baheer: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Stuttgart (Germany) lodged on 3 May 2023 — HE v Federal Republic of Germanycjeu_case · 3 мая 2023 г.
18262Case C-286/23, Asociația Crescătorilor de Vaci ‘Bălțată Românească’ Tip Simmental: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Brașov (Romania) lodged on 3 May 2023 — Asociația Crescătorilor de Vaci ‘Bălțată Românească’ Tip Simmental v Genetica din Transilvania Cooperativă Agricolă and Agenția Națională pentru Zootehnie ‘Prof. dr. G.K. Constantinescu’cjeu_case · 3 мая 2023 г.
18263Case C-285/23, Linte: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Ekonomisko lietu tiesa (Latvia) lodged on 3 May 2023 — Criminal proceedings against A, B, C, Z, F, AS Latgales Invest Holding, SIA METEOR HOLDING, METEOR Kettenfabrik GmbH, SIA Tool Industry, AS Ditton pievadķēžu rūpnīcacjeu_case · 3 мая 2023 г.
18264Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 May 2023.#Laboratorios Ern, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark BIOLARK – Earlier national word mark BIOPLAK – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-459/22.cjeu_case · 3 мая 2023 г.
18265Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 May 2023.#Laboratorios Ern, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark BIOLARK – Earlier national word mark BIOPLAK – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-459/22.cjeu_case · 3 мая 2023 г.
18266Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 3 May 2023.#Dicofarm SpA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark Vitis pharma Dicofarm group – Earlier national figurative mark viti DREN – Relative ground for invalidity – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Weak similarity of the goods and services – No likelihood of confusion.#Case T-303/22.cjeu_case · 3 мая 2023 г.
18267Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 3 May 2023.#Dicofarm SpA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark Vitis pharma Dicofarm group – Earlier national figurative mark viti DREN – Relative ground for invalidity – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Weak similarity of the goods and services – No likelihood of confusion.#Case T-303/22.cjeu_case · 3 мая 2023 г.
18268Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 3 May 2023.#Foundation for the Protection of the Traditional Cheese of Cyprus named Halloumi v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark GRILLOUMI – Earlier EU collective word mark HALLOUMI – Relative grounds for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Detriment to reputation – Article 8(1)(b) and Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) and Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-168/22.cjeu_case · 3 мая 2023 г.
18269Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 3 May 2023.#Foundation for the Protection of the Traditional Cheese of Cyprus named Halloumi v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark GRILLOUMI – Earlier EU collective word mark HALLOUMI – Relative grounds for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Detriment to reputation – Article 8(1)(b) and Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) and Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-168/22.cjeu_case · 3 мая 2023 г.
18270Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 3 May 2023.#Foundation for the Protection of the Traditional Cheese of Cyprus named Halloumi v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark BBQLOUMI – Earlier EU collective word mark HALLOUMI – Relative grounds for invalidity – Likelihood of confusion – Detriment to reputation – Article 8(1)(b), Article 8(5) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b), Article 8(5) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-106/22.cjeu_case · 3 мая 2023 г.
18271Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 3 May 2023.#Foundation for the Protection of the Traditional Cheese of Cyprus named Halloumi v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark BBQLOUMI – Earlier EU collective word mark HALLOUMI – Relative grounds for invalidity – Likelihood of confusion – Detriment to reputation – Article 8(1)(b), Article 8(5) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b), Article 8(5) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-106/22.cjeu_case · 3 мая 2023 г.
18272Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 3 May 2023.#Chambre de commerce et d'industrie territoriale de la Marne en Champagne v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#European Union trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark TEHA – Earlier national figurative mark tema – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Lack of genuine use of the mark – Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 47(2) and (3) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Use in a form which differs in elements which alter the distinctive character of the trade mark – Article 15(1), second subparagraph, point (a), of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 18(1), second subparagraph, point (a), of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-60/22.cjeu_case · 3 мая 2023 г.
18273Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 3 May 2023.#Chambre de commerce et d'industrie territoriale de la Marne en Champagne v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#European Union trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark TEHA – Earlier national figurative mark tema – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Lack of genuine use of the mark – Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 47(2) and (3) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Use in a form which differs in elements which alter the distinctive character of the trade mark – Article 15(1), second subparagraph, point (a), of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 18(1), second subparagraph, point (a), of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-60/22.cjeu_case · 3 мая 2023 г.
18274Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 3 May 2023.#Chambre de commerce et d'industrie territoriale de la Marne en Champagne v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#European Union trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the European Union figurative mark TEHA – Earlier national figurative mark tema – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Lack of genuine use of the mark – Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 47(2) and (3) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Use in a form which differs in elements which alter the distinctive character of the trade mark – Article 15(1), second subparagraph, point (a), of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 18(1), second subparagraph, point (a), of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-52/22.cjeu_case · 3 мая 2023 г.
18275Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 3 May 2023.#Chambre de commerce et d'industrie territoriale de la Marne en Champagne v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#European Union trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the European Union figurative mark TEHA – Earlier national figurative mark tema – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Lack of genuine use of the mark – Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 47(2) and (3) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Use in a form which differs in elements which alter the distinctive character of the trade mark – Article 15(1), second subparagraph, point (a), of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 18(1), second subparagraph, point (a), of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-52/22.cjeu_case · 3 мая 2023 г.
18276Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 3 May 2023.#FFI Female Financial Invest GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark Financery – Earlier EU word mark financify – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-7/22.cjeu_case · 3 мая 2023 г.
18277Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 3 May 2023.#FFI Female Financial Invest GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark Financery – Earlier EU word mark financify – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-7/22.cjeu_case · 3 мая 2023 г.
18278Case T-459/22: Judgment of the General Court of 3 May 2023 — Laboratorios Ern v EUIPO — Biolark (BIOLARK) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Figurative mark BIOLARK — Earlier national word mark BIOPLAK — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 3 мая 2023 г.
18279Case T-303/22: Judgment of the General Court of 3 May 2023 — Dicofarm v EUIPO — Marco Viti Farmaceutici (Vitis pharma Dicofarm group) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU figurative mark Vitis pharma Dicofarm group — Earlier national figurative mark viti DREN — Relative ground for invalidity — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Weak similarity of the goods and services — No likelihood of confusion)cjeu_case · 3 мая 2023 г.
18280Case T-168/22: Judgment of the General Court of 3 May 2023 — Foundation for the Protection of the Traditional Cheese of Cyprus named Halloumi v EUIPO — Fontana Food (GRILLOUMI) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark GRILLOUMI — Earlier EU collective word mark HALLOUMI — Relative grounds for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Detriment to reputation — Article 8(1)(b) and Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) and Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))cjeu_case · 3 мая 2023 г.