13541Case T-81/23: Judgment of the General Court of 7 February 2024 — Beauty Biosciences v EUIPO — Société de Recherche Cosmétique (BEAUTYBIO SCIENCE) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU figurative mark BEAUTYBIO SCIENCE — Absolute grounds for invalidity — Descriptiveness — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001))cjeu_case · 7 февраля 2024 г.
13542Case T-80/23: Judgment of the General Court of 7 February 2024 — Beauty Biosciences v EUIPO — Société de Recherche Cosmétique (BEAUTYBIO) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark BEAUTYBIO — Absolute grounds for invalidity — Descriptiveness — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001))cjeu_case · 7 февраля 2024 г.
13543Case T-74/23: Judgment of the General Court of 7 February 2024 — Oriflame Cosmetics v EUIPO — Caramé (O) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Figurative mark O — Earlier international registration in respect of the figurative mark O — Relative grounds for refusal — No genuine use of the earlier mark — Article 42(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 47(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))cjeu_case · 7 февраля 2024 г.
13544Case T-40/23: Judgment of the General Court of 7 February 2024 — Hatherly v EUAA (Civil service — Staff of the EUAA — Recruitment — Vacancy notice — Selection procedure for posts of assistants — Job offer — Condition relating to level of post-secondary education attested by a diploma and appropriate professional experience acquired after having obtained the diploma — Withdrawal of job offer — Error of assessment — Equal treatment — Proportionality — Liability)cjeu_case · 7 февраля 2024 г.
13545Order of the Court of 7 February 2024.#Groz-Beckert KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case C-691/23 P.cjeu_case · 7 февраля 2024 г.
13546Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 7 February 2024.#Quatrotec Electrónica, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU figurative mark WOXTER – Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Admissibility of evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Proof of genuine use – Assessment of the evidence.#Case T-792/22.cjeu_case · 7 февраля 2024 г.
13547Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 7 February 2024.#Quatrotec Electrónica, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU figurative mark WOXTER – Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Admissibility of evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Proof of genuine use – Assessment of the evidence.#Case T-792/22.cjeu_case · 7 февраля 2024 г.
13548Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 7 February 2024.#Topper Argentina, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark wetoper – Earlier national word mark TOPPER and earlier Benelux figurative mark Topper – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-630/22.cjeu_case · 7 февраля 2024 г.
13549Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 7 February 2024.#Topper Argentina, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark wetoper – Earlier national word mark TOPPER and earlier Benelux figurative mark Topper – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-630/22.cjeu_case · 7 февраля 2024 г.
13550Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 7 February 2024.#Polaroid IP BV v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark representing a square placed inside a rectangle – Absolute ground for invalidity – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-591/22.cjeu_case · 7 февраля 2024 г.
13551Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 7 February 2024.#Polaroid IP BV v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark representing a square placed inside a rectangle – Absolute ground for invalidity – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-591/22.cjeu_case · 7 февраля 2024 г.
13552Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 7 February 2024.#VP v European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training.#Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – Fixed-term contract – Non-renewal of a contract for an indefinite period – Article 266 TFEU – Decision adopted in compliance with a judgment of the General Court – Measures necessary to comply with a judgment delivered in an action for annulment.#Case T-563/22.cjeu_case · 7 февраля 2024 г.
13553Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 7 February 2024.#VP v European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training.#Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – Fixed-term contract – Non-renewal of a contract for an indefinite period – Article 266 TFEU – Decision adopted in compliance with a judgment of the General Court – Measures necessary to comply with a judgment delivered in an action for annulment.#Case T-563/22.cjeu_case · 7 февраля 2024 г.
13554Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 7 February 2024 (Extracts).#Republic of Austria v European Commission.#EAGF and EAFRD – Expenditure excluded from financing – Expenditure incurred by Austria – Reduction coefficient – Article 24(6) of Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 – Article 30(7)(b) of Regulation No 1307/2013 – Article 52(4)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-501/22.cjeu_case · 7 февраля 2024 г.
13555Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 7 February 2024 (Extracts).#Republic of Austria v European Commission.#EAGF and EAFRD – Expenditure excluded from financing – Expenditure incurred by Austria – Reduction coefficient – Article 24(6) of Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 – Article 30(7)(b) of Regulation No 1307/2013 – Article 52(4)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-501/22.cjeu_case · 7 февраля 2024 г.
13556Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 7 February 2024.#XH v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Promotion – 2021 promotion exercise – Decision not to promote the applicant to grade AD 7 – Article 45 of the Staff Regulations – Explicit decision rejecting the complaint – Modification of the application – Obligation to state reasons – Manifest error of assessment.#Case T-353/22.cjeu_case · 7 февраля 2024 г.
13557Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 7 February 2024.#XH v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Promotion – 2021 promotion exercise – Decision not to promote the applicant to grade AD 7 – Article 45 of the Staff Regulations – Explicit decision rejecting the complaint – Modification of the application – Obligation to state reasons – Manifest error of assessment.#Case T-353/22.cjeu_case · 7 февраля 2024 г.
13558Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 7 February 2024.#Igor Shuvalov v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Status of natural person supporting actions or policies which undermine or threaten the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Article 2(1)(a) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Obligation to state reasons – Error of assessment – Freedom of expression – Equal treatment – Proportionality – Right to property – Right to effective judicial protection – Misuse of powers.#Case T-289/22.cjeu_case · 7 февраля 2024 г.
13559Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 7 February 2024.#Igor Shuvalov v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Status of natural person supporting actions or policies which undermine or threaten the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Article 2(1)(a) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Obligation to state reasons – Error of assessment – Freedom of expression – Equal treatment – Proportionality – Right to property – Right to effective judicial protection – Misuse of powers.#Case T-289/22.cjeu_case · 7 февраля 2024 г.
13560Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 7 February 2024.#Alisher Usmanov v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Restrictions on entry into the territories of the Member States – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to restrictions on entry into the territories of the Member States – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – Meaning of ‘supporting actions or policies which undermine or threaten the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine’ – Article 2(1)(a) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 3(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Jurisdiction of the General Court – Obligation to state reasons – Error of assessment – Rights of the defence – Right to property and freedom to conduct a business – Freedom of movement.#Case T-237/22.cjeu_case · 7 февраля 2024 г.